The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Northern Iowa

MVC · 2–1

Power+5.3#105 of 365
Résumé+0.10#172 · wins above average
Movement+5up from #110 last week
Best winGreen Bay (89–76)
Worst lossFurman (83–98)
Schedule faced-7.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+7.0 avg opponent
Returning production7% of last season's win shares · #294 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production11.0 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+10.2 avg× 27%+2.8
Opponents faced-7.3 avg× 27%-2.0
Preseason prior+6.2× 73%+4.5
Power+5.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Cornell College (IA) non-D1 W 106–70 +41.4 -5.4 +0.8
2 at Furman L 83–98 -1.6 -13.4 -0.9
3 vs Green Bay W 89–76 +9.4 +3.6 +0.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)+4.5
Power+5.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Michigan State -25.7 1%
3 at Oakland +7.3 75%
4 vs Lindenwood +15.9 93%
5 N Davidson -0.4 49%
5 N Charlotte +5.3 68%
5 vs Robert Morris +11.6 85%
6 at Kansas -28.9 0%

Season by season

Best finish: #16 in 2014–15. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 250 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #60 of 326 (21-11)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #44 of 326 (23-10)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #106 of 326 (18-13)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #149 of 328 (18-14)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #74 of 330 (23-11)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #30 of 335 (30-5)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #108 of 346 (20-14)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #107 of 345 (18-14)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #88 of 347 (17-14)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #121 of 351 (16-15)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #16 of 351 (31-4)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #123 of 351 (23-13)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #227 of 351 (14-16)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #155 of 351 (16-16)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #196 of 353 (14-18)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #33 of 353 (23-6)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #161 of 347 (10-15)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 358 (20-12)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #196 of 363 (14-18)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 362 (19-14)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 364 (20-13)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 365 (23-13) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 23–13 #84 of 365 · 8.45 –
2024–25 20–13 #106 of 364 · 5.00 –
2023–24 19–14 #124 of 362 · 3.26 –
2022–23 14–18 #196 of 363 · -1.68 –
2021–22 20–12 #95 of 358 · 6.01 –
2020–21 10–15 #161 of 347 · 0.21 –
2019–20 23–6 – #33 of 353 · 106.90
2018–19 14–18 – #196 of 353 · 20.08
2017–18 16–16 – #155 of 351 · 45.48
2016–17 14–16 – #227 of 351 · 13.38
2015–16 23–13 – #123 of 351 · 60.66
2014–15 31–4 – #16 of 351 · 148.37
2013–14 16–15 – #121 of 351 · 58.67
2012–13 17–14 – #88 of 347 · 65.74
2011–12 18–14 – #107 of 345 · 66.65
2010–11 20–14 – #108 of 346 · 66.91
2009–10 30–5 – #30 of 335 · 131.25
2008–09 23–11 – #74 of 330 · 85.54
2007–08 18–14 – #149 of 328 · 41.28
2006–07 18–13 – #106 of 326 · 61.51
2005–06 23–10 – #44 of 326 · 102.23
2004–05 21–11 – #60 of 326 · 87.89