The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Oakland

Horizon · 16–16

Power+0.3#161 of 365
Résumé-0.76#392 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winToledo (98–97)
Worst lossIU Indianapolis (85–103)
Schedule faced-0.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Michigan L 78–121 -35.1 -7.9
1 at Purdue L 77–87 -28.0 +18.0
2 at Houston L 45–78 -30.6 -2.4
2 vs Defiance non-D1 W 113–47 +40.9 +25.1
3 at UCF L 83–87 -13.8 +9.8
3 at Eastern Michigan L 91–97 +3.9 -9.9
4 N Lamar W 83–68 +5.5 +9.5
4 at Montana W 95–87 -0.4 +8.4
5 vs Purdue Fort Wayne W 101–92 +7.5 +1.5
5 vs Toledo W 98–97 +0.8 +0.2
6 at Northern Iowa L 63–75 -11.9 -0.1
7 at Northern Kentucky W 82–77 -2.3 +7.3
7 N Michigan State L 70–79 -24.1 +15.1
9 at Wright State L 73–88 -4.7 -10.3
9 at Youngstown State W 85–83 -0.9 +2.9
9 vs Robert Morris W 96–73 +1.5 +21.5
10 vs Cleveland State W 97–72 +13.7 +11.3
10 vs Wright State L 84–94 +0.8 -10.8
11 at Milwaukee W 73–60 +3.0 +10.0
11 at Green Bay W 88–63 +2.8 +22.2
12 vs IU Indianapolis L 85–103 +15.7 -33.6
12 at Detroit Mercy W 95–87 +3.8 +4.2
13 at Purdue Fort Wayne W 74–65 +2.0 +7.0
13 vs Northern Kentucky W 76–65 +3.1 +7.9
14 at Cleveland State L 78–91 +8.2 -21.2
15 vs Youngstown State L 82–86 +4.6 -8.6
15 at Robert Morris L 69–93 -3.9 -20.1
16 vs Green Bay L 68–73 +8.2 -13.2
16 vs Milwaukee W 81–70 +8.5 +2.5
17 at IU Indianapolis W 86–74 +10.2 +1.8
17 vs Detroit Mercy L 89–95 +9.2 -15.2
18 vs Northern Kentucky L 84–85 +3.1 -4.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #46 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #211 of 326 (13-19)2005–06: #244 of 326 (11-18)2006–07: #120 of 326 (19-14)2007–08: #128 of 328 (17-14)2008–09: #139 of 330 (23-13)2009–10: #82 of 335 (26-9)2010–11: #60 of 346 (25-10)2011–12: #168 of 345 (17-15)2012–13: #215 of 347 (14-16)2013–14: #247 of 351 (13-20)2014–15: #209 of 351 (16-17)2015–16: #46 of 351 (23-12)2016–17: #60 of 351 (24-9)2017–18: #150 of 351 (19-14)2018–19: #219 of 353 (15-17)2019–20: #241 of 353 (13-19)2020–21: #258 of 347 (12-18)2021–22: #164 of 358 (20-12)2022–23: #269 of 363 (13-19)2023–24: #147 of 362 (24-12)2024–25: #191 of 364 (16-18)2025–26: #161 of 365 (16-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 161 of 365 16–16 0.27 Power
2024–25 191 of 364 16–18 -1.54 Power
2023–24 147 of 362 24–12 1.85 Power
2022–23 269 of 363 13–19 -6.44 Power
2021–22 164 of 358 20–12 0.68 Power
2020–21 258 of 347 12–18 -6.42 Power
2019–20 241 of 353 13–19 0.60 MRI
2018–19 219 of 353 15–17 6.32 MRI
2017–18 150 of 351 19–14 48.28 MRI
2016–17 60 of 351 24–9 94.32 MRI
2015–16 46 of 351 23–12 110.94 MRI
2014–15 209 of 351 16–17 21.03 MRI
2013–14 247 of 351 13–20 5.29 MRI
2012–13 215 of 347 14–16 10.72 MRI
2011–12 168 of 345 17–15 36.97 MRI
2010–11 60 of 346 25–10 97.90 MRI
2009–10 82 of 335 26–9 82.91 MRI
2008–09 139 of 330 23–13 46.58 MRI
2007–08 128 of 328 17–14 53.75 MRI
2006–07 120 of 326 19–14 54.05 MRI
2005–06 244 of 326 11–18 -1.33 MRI
2004–05 211 of 326 13–19 14.91 MRI