The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Northwestern

Big Ten · 15–19

Power+10.4#60 of 365
Résumé+5.49#91 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIndiana (72–68)
Worst lossRutgers (75–77)
Schedule faced+10.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Mercyhurst W 70–47 +22.0 +1.0
1 vs Boston University W 76–52 +20.0 +4.0
2 vs Cleveland State W 110–63 +23.7 +23.3
2 at DePaul W 81–79 +4.1 -2.1
3 N Virginia L 78–83 -7.9 +2.9
3 N South Carolina W 79–77 +4.9 -2.9
4 vs Oklahoma State L 81–86 +5.3 -10.3
5 at Wisconsin L 73–85 -11.8 -0.2
5 vs Ohio State L 82–86 -4.5 +0.5
6 vs Jackson State W 93–53 +29.0 +11.0
7 vs Valparaiso W 86–70 +13.7 +2.3
7 N Butler L 58–61 +2.9 -5.9
9 vs Howard W 80–60 +15.0 +5.0
9 vs Minnesota L 78–84 +6.0 -12.0
10 at Michigan State L 66–76 -16.7 +6.7
10 at Rutgers L 75–77 +4.9 -6.9
11 vs Illinois L 68–79 -13.5 +2.5
11 vs Nebraska L 58–77 -7.9 -11.1
12 at USC W 74–68 -1.1 +7.1
12 at UCLA L 64–71 -9.4 +2.4
13 vs Penn State W 94–73 +10.6 +10.4
13 vs Washington L 62–76 +2.3 -16.3
14 at Illinois L 44–84 -19.0 -21.0
14 at Iowa L 70–76 -10.1 +4.1
15 vs Michigan L 75–87 -19.5 +7.5
15 at Nebraska L 49–68 -13.3 -5.7
16 vs Maryland W 78–74 +7.8 -3.8
17 at Indiana W 72–68 -6.6 +10.6
17 vs Oregon W 63–62 +5.9 -4.9
18 vs Purdue L 66–70 -12.5 +8.5
18 at Minnesota L 66–67 +0.6 -1.6
19 N Penn State W 76–66 +7.8 +2.2
19 N Indiana W 74–61 -3.9 +16.9
19 N Purdue L 68–81 -15.2 +2.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #48 in 2022–23. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #169 of 326 (15-15)2005–06: #201 of 326 (14-15)2006–07: #208 of 326 (13-18)2007–08: #289 of 328 (8-22)2008–09: #114 of 330 (17-14)2009–10: #111 of 335 (20-14)2010–11: #81 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #128 of 345 (18-14)2012–13: #218 of 347 (13-19)2013–14: #236 of 351 (14-19)2014–15: #183 of 351 (15-17)2015–16: #100 of 351 (20-12)2016–17: #50 of 351 (24-12)2017–18: #146 of 351 (15-16)2018–19: #153 of 353 (13-19)2019–20: #264 of 353 (8-23)2020–21: #143 of 347 (9-15)2021–22: #92 of 358 (15-16)2022–23: #48 of 363 (22-12)2023–24: #51 of 362 (22-12)2024–25: #54 of 364 (17-16)2025–26: #60 of 365 (15-19) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 60 of 365 15–19 10.36 Power
2024–25 54 of 364 17–16 11.85 Power
2023–24 51 of 362 22–12 11.90 Power
2022–23 48 of 363 22–12 11.29 Power
2021–22 92 of 358 15–16 6.22 Power
2020–21 143 of 347 9–15 1.90 Power
2019–20 264 of 353 8–23 -6.20 MRI
2018–19 153 of 353 13–19 38.77 MRI
2017–18 146 of 351 15–16 49.51 MRI
2016–17 50 of 351 24–12 103.66 MRI
2015–16 100 of 351 20–12 72.54 MRI
2014–15 183 of 351 15–17 30.17 MRI
2013–14 236 of 351 14–19 10.01 MRI
2012–13 218 of 347 13–19 9.06 MRI
2011–12 128 of 345 18–14 54.19 MRI
2010–11 81 of 346 20–14 79.35 MRI
2009–10 111 of 335 20–14 63.76 MRI
2008–09 114 of 330 17–14 59.15 MRI
2007–08 289 of 328 8–22 -25.95 MRI
2006–07 208 of 326 13–18 13.40 MRI
2005–06 201 of 326 14–15 20.41 MRI
2004–05 169 of 326 15–15 29.51 MRI