Binghamton
Am. East · 8–23
Power-17.8#355 of 365
Résumé-15.24#724 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLehigh (80–71)
Worst lossCanisius (66–75)
Schedule faced-11.2 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at | Syracuse | L 47–85 | -26.6 | -11.4 |
| 1 | vs | RIT non-D1 | W 66–56 | +22.8 | -12.8 |
| 1 | vs | Niagara | L 59–67 | -0.6 | -7.4 |
| 2 | at | Georgetown | L 70–83 | -27.5 | +14.5 |
| 2 | at | Longwood | L 82–90 | -16.0 | +8.0 |
| 3 | vs | Misericordia non-D1 | W 69–58 | +22.8 | -11.8 |
| 3 | N | Maryland Eastern Shore | L 52–63 | -2.3 | -8.7 |
| 3 | at | Canisius | L 66–75 | -4.1 | -4.9 |
| 5 | vs | Lehigh | W 80–71 | -5.7 | +14.7 |
| 5 | vs | Le Moyne | L 63–78 | -4.4 | -10.6 |
| 6 | vs | Central Connecticut | L 67–84 | -7.3 | -9.7 |
| 7 | at | Pittsburgh | L 63–103 | -26.2 | -13.8 |
| 7 | at | Mercyhurst | L 61–82 | -11.7 | -9.3 |
| 8 | at | Army | L 85–95 | -5.9 | -4.1 |
| 9 | vs | Elmira non-D1 | W 100–60 | +22.8 | +17.2 |
| 9 | vs | NJIT | L 65–73 | -1.6 | -6.4 |
| 10 | at | Vermont | L 59–60 | -18.1 | +17.1 |
| 10 | vs | UMass Lowell | L 68–73 | -7.1 | +2.1 |
| 11 | at | UAlbany | L 53–69 | -11.0 | -5.0 |
| 12 | vs | UMBC | L 60–78 | -14.1 | -3.9 |
| 12 | at | New Hampshire | L 82–88 | -6.0 | -0.0 |
| 12 | at | Maine | L 63–79 | -8.0 | -8.0 |
| 13 | vs | Bryant | W 63–60 | -2.7 | +5.7 |
| 14 | at | UMBC | L 62–79 | -19.6 | +2.6 |
| 14 | at | NJIT | L 64–73 | -7.1 | -1.9 |
| 15 | vs | Vermont | L 65–73 | -12.6 | +4.6 |
| 15 | vs | UAlbany | L 74–77 | -5.6 | +2.6 |
| 16 | at | Bryant | W 79–67 | -8.2 | +20.2 |
| 16 | at | UMass Lowell | L 79–92 | -12.6 | -0.4 |
| 17 | vs | New Hampshire | W 65–63 | -0.5 | +2.5 |
| 17 | vs | Maine | W 74–67 | -2.5 | +9.5 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #142 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 355 of 365 | 8–23 | -17.84 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 294 of 364 | 15–17 | -9.12 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 286 of 362 | 15–15 | -7.36 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 305 of 363 | 13–18 | -9.22 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 297 of 358 | 12–17 | -8.71 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 320 of 347 | 4–14 | -12.14 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 336 of 353 | 8–19 | -64.94 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 336 of 353 | 8–23 | -71.85 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 265 of 351 | 11–20 | -4.93 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 292 of 351 | 12–20 | -21.19 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 317 of 351 | 8–22 | -37.14 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 337 of 351 | 6–26 | -57.13 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 343 of 351 | 7–23 | -73.94 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 342 of 347 | 2–27 | -98.17 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 344 of 345 | 2–29 | -107.03 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 325 of 346 | 8–23 | -57.38 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 279 of 335 | 13–18 | -17.81 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 142 of 330 | 23–9 | 43.82 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 216 of 328 | 14–16 | 8.80 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 213 of 326 | 13–16 | 10.52 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 161 of 326 | 16–13 | 34.37 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 163 of 326 | 11–17 | 31.82 | MRI |