Binghamton
Am. East · 3–1
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +9.6 avg | × 33% | +3.2 |
| Opponents faced | -12.9 avg | × 33% | -4.3 |
| Preseason prior | -16.9 | × 67% | -11.3 |
| Power | -12.4 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Northwestern | L 60–86 | -27.2 | +1.2 | -1.1 |
| 2 | at | Saint Peter's | W 58–55 | -3.3 | +6.3 | +0.1 |
| 2 | vs | Rider | W 75–63 | +10.6 | +1.4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | at | Misericordia non-D1 | W 87–62 | +17.9 | +7.1 | +0.8 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | -11.3 | |||||
| Power | -12.4 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Duquesne | -12.4 | 13% |
| 4 | at | Lafayette | -4.5 | 34% |
| 4 | vs | Army | +0.9 | 53% |
| 5 | at | Lehigh | -6.6 | 27% |
| 6 | at | Fairleigh Dickinson | -2.5 | 41% |
| 6 | at | Le Moyne | -4.1 | 35% |
| 6 | vs | Alfred State non-D1 | +23.8 | 98% |
| 7 | at | Delaware State | -2.0 | 43% |
Season by season
Best finish: #142 in 2008–09. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 8–23 | #356 of 365 · -18.25 | – |
| 2024–25 | 15–17 | #291 of 364 · -8.97 | – |
| 2023–24 | 15–15 | #275 of 362 · -6.90 | – |
| 2022–23 | 13–18 | #296 of 363 · -8.65 | – |
| 2021–22 | 12–17 | #280 of 358 · -7.91 | – |
| 2020–21 | 4–14 | #320 of 347 · -12.25 | – |
| 2019–20 | 8–19 | – | #336 of 353 · -64.94 |
| 2018–19 | 8–23 | – | #336 of 353 · -71.85 |
| 2017–18 | 11–20 | – | #265 of 351 · -4.93 |
| 2016–17 | 12–20 | – | #292 of 351 · -21.19 |
| 2015–16 | 8–22 | – | #317 of 351 · -37.14 |
| 2014–15 | 6–26 | – | #337 of 351 · -57.13 |
| 2013–14 | 7–23 | – | #343 of 351 · -73.94 |
| 2012–13 | 2–27 | – | #342 of 347 · -98.17 |
| 2011–12 | 2–29 | – | #344 of 345 · -107.03 |
| 2010–11 | 8–23 | – | #325 of 346 · -57.38 |
| 2009–10 | 13–18 | – | #279 of 335 · -17.81 |
| 2008–09 | 23–9 | – | #142 of 330 · 43.82 |
| 2007–08 | 14–16 | – | #216 of 328 · 8.80 |
| 2006–07 | 13–16 | – | #213 of 326 · 10.52 |
| 2005–06 | 16–13 | – | #161 of 326 · 34.37 |
| 2004–05 | 11–17 | – | #163 of 326 · 31.82 |