The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Arizona State

Big 12 · 17–16

Power+8.4#81 of 365
Résumé+8.72#59 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTexas Tech (72–67)
Worst lossOregon State (75–78)
Schedule faced+11.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Southern Utah W 81–64 +19.5 -2.5
1 vs Utah Tech W 81–66 +15.2 -0.2
2 vs Gonzaga L 65–77 -13.7 +1.7
3 vs Georgia State W 75–62 +21.0 -8.0
3 at Hawai'i W 83–76 +2.5 +4.5
4 N Texas W 87–86 -7.3 +8.3
4 N Washington State W 100–94 +7.2 -1.2
4 N USC L 75–88 -0.4 -12.6
5 N Oklahoma W 86–70 -5.5 +21.5
6 vs Northern Arizona W 73–48 +22.1 +2.9
6 N Santa Clara W 82–79 -6.8 +9.8
7 at UCLA L 77–90 -11.4 -1.6
7 vs Oregon State L 75–78 +11.6 -14.6
9 vs Colorado L 89–95 +2.5 -8.5
10 at BYU L 76–104 -13.6 -14.4
10 vs Kansas State W 87–84 +6.1 -3.1
11 at Arizona L 82–89 -25.8 +18.8
11 at Houston L 73–103 -22.5 -7.5
12 vs West Virginia L 63–75 -0.7 -11.3
12 vs Cincinnati W 82–68 -3.3 +17.3
13 at UCF L 76–79 -5.7 +2.7
13 vs Arizona L 74–87 -20.3 +7.3
14 at Utah W 71–63 +2.7 +5.3
14 at Colorado L 70–78 -3.0 -5.0
15 vs Oklahoma State W 85–76 +3.3 +5.7
16 vs Texas Tech W 72–67 -10.4 +15.4
16 at Baylor L 68–73 -7.8 +2.8
17 at TCU L 78–90 -7.3 -4.7
17 vs Utah W 73–60 +8.2 +4.8
18 vs Kansas W 70–60 -9.2 +19.2
18 at Iowa State L 65–86 -21.0 +0.0
19 N Baylor W 83–79 -5.1 +9.1
19 N Iowa State L 42–91 -18.3 -30.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #24 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #67 of 326 (17-14)2005–06: #195 of 326 (11-17)2006–07: #205 of 326 (8-22)2007–08: #73 of 328 (21-13)2008–09: #24 of 330 (25-10)2009–10: #54 of 335 (22-11)2010–11: #220 of 346 (12-19)2011–12: #272 of 345 (10-20)2012–13: #81 of 347 (21-12)2013–14: #69 of 351 (21-12)2014–15: #88 of 351 (18-16)2015–16: #129 of 351 (15-17)2016–17: #209 of 351 (15-18)2017–18: #52 of 351 (20-12)2018–19: #53 of 353 (23-11)2019–20: #80 of 353 (20-11)2020–21: #127 of 347 (11-14)2021–22: #106 of 358 (14-17)2022–23: #69 of 363 (23-13)2023–24: #141 of 362 (14-18)2024–25: #89 of 364 (13-20)2025–26: #81 of 365 (17-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 81 of 365 17–16 8.36 Power
2024–25 89 of 364 13–20 6.50 Power
2023–24 141 of 362 14–18 2.76 Power
2022–23 69 of 363 23–13 9.33 Power
2021–22 106 of 358 14–17 4.96 Power
2020–21 127 of 347 11–14 2.83 Power
2019–20 80 of 353 20–11 78.71 MRI
2018–19 53 of 353 23–11 94.82 MRI
2017–18 52 of 351 20–12 105.70 MRI
2016–17 209 of 351 15–18 22.71 MRI
2015–16 129 of 351 15–17 58.14 MRI
2014–15 88 of 351 18–16 78.37 MRI
2013–14 69 of 351 21–12 86.41 MRI
2012–13 81 of 347 21–12 72.17 MRI
2011–12 272 of 345 10–20 -11.47 MRI
2010–11 220 of 346 12–19 13.58 MRI
2009–10 54 of 335 22–11 107.44 MRI
2008–09 24 of 330 25–10 133.42 MRI
2007–08 73 of 328 21–13 82.75 MRI
2006–07 205 of 326 8–22 14.45 MRI
2005–06 195 of 326 11–17 23.48 MRI
2004–05 67 of 326 17–14 82.29 MRI