The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Alabama

SEC · 25–10

Power+24.4#10 of 365
Résumé+18.75#10 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIllinois (90–86)
Worst lossOle Miss (79–80)
Schedule faced+14.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs North Dakota W 91–62 +34.4 -5.4
1 at St. John's W 103–96 -1.7 +8.8
2 vs Purdue L 80–87 +1.6 -8.6
3 N Illinois W 90–86 -2.2 +6.2
4 N Gonzaga L 85–95 -0.3 -9.7
4 N UNLV W 115–76 +19.9 +19.1
4 N Maryland W 105–72 +19.2 +13.8
5 vs Clemson W 90–84 +11.3 -5.3
5 vs UTSA W 97–55 +41.9 +0.1
6 N Arizona L 75–96 -6.9 -14.1
7 vs South Florida W 104–93 +14.6 -3.6
7 N Kennesaw State W 92–81 +22.0 -11.0
9 vs Yale W 102–78 +16.9 +7.1
9 vs Kentucky W 89–74 +9.0 +6.0
10 at Vanderbilt L 90–96 +0.1 -6.1
10 vs Texas L 88–92 +11.5 -15.5
11 at Mississippi State W 97–82 +15.6 -0.6
11 at Oklahoma W 83–81 +7.8 -5.8
12 vs Tennessee L 73–79 +4.1 -10.1
13 vs Missouri W 90–64 +14.5 +11.5
13 at Florida L 77–100 -7.4 -15.6
14 vs Texas A&M W 100–97 +11.6 -8.6
14 at Auburn W 96–92 +3.2 +0.8
15 at Ole Miss W 93–74 +12.0 +7.0
15 vs South Carolina W 89–75 +21.7 -7.7
16 vs Arkansas W 117–115 +6.1 -4.1
16 at LSU W 90–83 +12.2 -5.2
17 vs Mississippi State W 100–75 +21.0 +4.0
17 at Tennessee W 71–69 -1.4 +3.4
18 at Georgia L 88–98 +5.2 -15.2
18 vs Auburn W 96–84 +8.7 +3.3
19 N Ole Miss L 79–80 +14.7 -15.7
20 N Hofstra W 90–70 +18.0 +2.0
21 N Texas Tech W 90–65 +2.9 +22.1
21 N Michigan L 77–90 -8.2 -4.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2022–23. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #21 of 326 (24-8)2005–06: #87 of 326 (18-13)2006–07: #71 of 326 (20-12)2007–08: #93 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #118 of 330 (18-14)2009–10: #94 of 335 (17-15)2010–11: #33 of 346 (25-12)2011–12: #42 of 345 (21-12)2012–13: #89 of 347 (20-12)2013–14: #147 of 351 (13-19)2014–15: #101 of 351 (19-15)2015–16: #177 of 351 (18-15)2016–17: #59 of 351 (19-14)2017–18: #84 of 351 (20-16)2018–19: #121 of 353 (18-16)2019–20: #101 of 353 (16-15)2020–21: #8 of 347 (26-7)2021–22: #26 of 358 (19-14)2022–23: #2 of 363 (31-6)2023–24: #7 of 362 (25-12)2024–25: #5 of 364 (28-9)2025–26: #10 of 365 (25-10) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 10 of 365 25–10 24.44 Power
2024–25 5 of 364 28–9 24.78 Power
2023–24 7 of 362 25–12 20.49 Power
2022–23 2 of 363 31–6 22.79 Power
2021–22 26 of 358 19–14 14.11 Power
2020–21 8 of 347 26–7 16.98 Power
2019–20 101 of 353 16–15 67.12 MRI
2018–19 121 of 353 18–16 56.33 MRI
2017–18 84 of 351 20–16 80.71 MRI
2016–17 59 of 351 19–14 95.41 MRI
2015–16 177 of 351 18–15 34.67 MRI
2014–15 101 of 351 19–15 69.02 MRI
2013–14 147 of 351 13–19 45.27 MRI
2012–13 89 of 347 20–12 65.33 MRI
2011–12 42 of 345 21–12 109.44 MRI
2010–11 33 of 346 25–12 119.81 MRI
2009–10 94 of 335 17–15 71.83 MRI
2008–09 118 of 330 18–14 57.11 MRI
2007–08 93 of 328 17–16 71.55 MRI
2006–07 71 of 326 20–12 89.29 MRI
2005–06 87 of 326 18–13 73.47 MRI
2004–05 21 of 326 24–8 138.17 MRI