Alabama
SEC · 25–10
Power+24.4#10 of 365
Résumé+18.75#10 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIllinois (90–86)
Worst lossOle Miss (79–80)
Schedule faced+14.7 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | North Dakota | W 91–62 | +34.4 | -5.4 |
| 1 | at | St. John's | W 103–96 | -1.7 | +8.8 |
| 2 | vs | Purdue | L 80–87 | +1.6 | -8.6 |
| 3 | N | Illinois | W 90–86 | -2.2 | +6.2 |
| 4 | N | Gonzaga | L 85–95 | -0.3 | -9.7 |
| 4 | N | UNLV | W 115–76 | +19.9 | +19.1 |
| 4 | N | Maryland | W 105–72 | +19.2 | +13.8 |
| 5 | vs | Clemson | W 90–84 | +11.3 | -5.3 |
| 5 | vs | UTSA | W 97–55 | +41.9 | +0.1 |
| 6 | N | Arizona | L 75–96 | -6.9 | -14.1 |
| 7 | vs | South Florida | W 104–93 | +14.6 | -3.6 |
| 7 | N | Kennesaw State | W 92–81 | +22.0 | -11.0 |
| 9 | vs | Yale | W 102–78 | +16.9 | +7.1 |
| 9 | vs | Kentucky | W 89–74 | +9.0 | +6.0 |
| 10 | at | Vanderbilt | L 90–96 | +0.1 | -6.1 |
| 10 | vs | Texas | L 88–92 | +11.5 | -15.5 |
| 11 | at | Mississippi State | W 97–82 | +15.6 | -0.6 |
| 11 | at | Oklahoma | W 83–81 | +7.8 | -5.8 |
| 12 | vs | Tennessee | L 73–79 | +4.1 | -10.1 |
| 13 | vs | Missouri | W 90–64 | +14.5 | +11.5 |
| 13 | at | Florida | L 77–100 | -7.4 | -15.6 |
| 14 | vs | Texas A&M | W 100–97 | +11.6 | -8.6 |
| 14 | at | Auburn | W 96–92 | +3.2 | +0.8 |
| 15 | at | Ole Miss | W 93–74 | +12.0 | +7.0 |
| 15 | vs | South Carolina | W 89–75 | +21.7 | -7.7 |
| 16 | vs | Arkansas | W 117–115 | +6.1 | -4.1 |
| 16 | at | LSU | W 90–83 | +12.2 | -5.2 |
| 17 | vs | Mississippi State | W 100–75 | +21.0 | +4.0 |
| 17 | at | Tennessee | W 71–69 | -1.4 | +3.4 |
| 18 | at | Georgia | L 88–98 | +5.2 | -15.2 |
| 18 | vs | Auburn | W 96–84 | +8.7 | +3.3 |
| 19 | N | Ole Miss | L 79–80 | +14.7 | -15.7 |
| 20 | N | Hofstra | W 90–70 | +18.0 | +2.0 |
| 21 | N | Texas Tech | W 90–65 | +2.9 | +22.1 |
| 21 | N | Michigan | L 77–90 | -8.2 | -4.8 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #2 in 2022–23. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 10 of 365 | 25–10 | 24.44 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 5 of 364 | 28–9 | 24.78 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 7 of 362 | 25–12 | 20.49 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 2 of 363 | 31–6 | 22.79 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 26 of 358 | 19–14 | 14.11 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 8 of 347 | 26–7 | 16.98 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 101 of 353 | 16–15 | 67.12 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 121 of 353 | 18–16 | 56.33 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 84 of 351 | 20–16 | 80.71 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 59 of 351 | 19–14 | 95.41 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 177 of 351 | 18–15 | 34.67 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 101 of 351 | 19–15 | 69.02 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 147 of 351 | 13–19 | 45.27 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 89 of 347 | 20–12 | 65.33 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 42 of 345 | 21–12 | 109.44 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 33 of 346 | 25–12 | 119.81 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 94 of 335 | 17–15 | 71.83 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 118 of 330 | 18–14 | 57.11 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 93 of 328 | 17–16 | 71.55 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 71 of 326 | 20–12 | 89.29 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 87 of 326 | 18–13 | 73.47 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 21 of 326 | 24–8 | 138.17 | MRI |