The MRI
2025–26 · Final

TCU

Big 12 · 23–12

Power+12.9#49 of 365
Résumé+11.98#37 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFlorida (84–80)
Worst lossNew Orleans (74–78)
Schedule faced+9.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs New Orleans L 74–78 +22.4 -26.4
1 vs St. Francis (PA) W 104–63 +33.4 +7.6
2 vs Lamar W 78–65 +20.9 -7.9
2 vs Michigan L 63–67 -16.9 +12.9
3 vs Kansas City W 81–45 +34.6 +1.4
4 N Florida W 84–80 -16.1 +20.1
4 N Wisconsin W 74–63 -6.5 +17.5
5 vs Notre Dame L 85–87 +10.7 -12.7
5 at North Texas W 65–55 +7.0 +3.0
7 vs Incarnate Word W 69–65 +23.2 -19.2
7 vs Oral Roberts W 72–53 +26.9 -7.9
7 vs Florida A&M W 80–56 +28.5 -4.5
9 vs Jackson State W 115–64 +31.6 +19.4
9 vs Baylor W 69–63 +2.2 +3.8
10 at Kansas L 100–104 -10.0 +6.0
10 vs Arizona L 73–86 -15.7 +2.7
11 at BYU L 70–76 -9.0 +3.0
11 at Utah L 79–82 +7.3 -10.3
12 vs Oklahoma State W 68–65 +7.8 -4.8
12 at Baylor W 97–90 -3.2 +10.2
13 vs Houston L 70–79 -12.5 +3.5
13 at Colorado L 61–87 +1.6 -27.6
14 vs Kansas State W 84–82 +10.7 -8.7
15 vs Iowa State W 62–55 -11.0 +18.0
15 at Oklahoma State W 95–92 +2.4 +0.6
16 at UCF L 71–82 -1.1 -9.9
16 vs West Virginia W 60–54 +3.9 +2.1
17 vs Arizona State W 90–78 +7.3 +4.7
17 at Kansas State W 77–68 +5.3 +3.7
18 at Texas Tech W 73–65 -11.3 +19.3
18 vs Cincinnati W 73–63 +1.3 +8.7
19 N Oklahoma State W 95–88 +5.1 +1.9
19 N Kansas L 73–78 -7.3 +2.3
20 N Ohio State W 66–64 -4.6 +6.6
20 N Duke L 58–81 -18.9 -4.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #28 in 2023–24. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #98 of 326 (20-14)2005–06: #278 of 326 (6-25)2006–07: #200 of 326 (13-17)2007–08: #169 of 328 (14-16)2008–09: #184 of 330 (14-17)2009–10: #231 of 335 (13-19)2010–11: #211 of 346 (11-22)2011–12: #171 of 345 (17-14)2012–13: #273 of 347 (10-21)2013–14: #307 of 351 (9-22)2014–15: #77 of 351 (18-15)2015–16: #222 of 351 (12-21)2016–17: #44 of 351 (24-15)2017–18: #33 of 351 (21-12)2018–19: #45 of 353 (23-14)2019–20: #122 of 353 (15-16)2020–21: #176 of 347 (12-14)2021–22: #58 of 358 (21-13)2022–23: #30 of 363 (22-13)2023–24: #28 of 362 (21-13)2024–25: #80 of 364 (16-16)2025–26: #49 of 365 (23-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 49 of 365 23–12 12.95 Power
2024–25 80 of 364 16–16 8.11 Power
2023–24 28 of 362 21–13 13.98 Power
2022–23 30 of 363 22–13 13.46 Power
2021–22 58 of 358 21–13 10.08 Power
2020–21 176 of 347 12–14 -0.62 Power
2019–20 122 of 353 15–16 52.17 MRI
2018–19 45 of 353 23–14 100.84 MRI
2017–18 33 of 351 21–12 122.95 MRI
2016–17 44 of 351 24–15 110.03 MRI
2015–16 222 of 351 12–21 10.25 MRI
2014–15 77 of 351 18–15 84.21 MRI
2013–14 307 of 351 9–22 -31.07 MRI
2012–13 273 of 347 10–21 -21.38 MRI
2011–12 171 of 345 17–14 35.20 MRI
2010–11 211 of 346 11–22 19.92 MRI
2009–10 231 of 335 13–19 7.09 MRI
2008–09 184 of 330 14–17 28.33 MRI
2007–08 169 of 328 14–16 30.62 MRI
2006–07 200 of 326 13–17 16.90 MRI
2005–06 278 of 326 6–25 -15.88 MRI
2004–05 98 of 326 20–14 63.91 MRI