The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Texas A&M

SEC · 22–12

Power+15.6#36 of 365
Résumé+11.50#42 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSaint Mary's (63–50)
Worst lossOklahoma State (63–87)
Schedule faced+8.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Northwestern State W 98–68 +28.9 +1.1
1 vs Texas Southern W 104–70 +30.0 +4.0
1 at Oklahoma State L 63–87 +5.0 -29.0
2 vs UCF L 74–86 +7.0 -19.0
3 vs Montana W 86–81 +20.4 -15.4
3 vs Manhattan W 109–68 +31.3 +9.7
4 vs Mississippi Valley State W 120–84 +48.2 -12.2
4 N Florida State W 95–59 +6.9 +29.1
5 at Pittsburgh W 81–73 +7.3 +0.7
5 N SMU L 80–93 +1.6 -14.6
7 vs Jacksonville W 112–75 +27.0 +10.0
7 vs East Texas A&M W 118–77 +30.9 +10.1
9 vs Prairie View A&M W 111–82 +29.3 -0.3
9 vs LSU W 75–72 +8.8 -5.8
10 at Auburn W 90–88 -5.6 +7.6
10 vs Oklahoma W 83–76 +4.4 +2.6
11 at Tennessee L 82–87 -10.2 +5.2
11 at Texas W 74–70 -2.8 +6.8
12 vs Mississippi State W 88–68 +12.2 +7.8
12 vs South Carolina W 92–69 +12.9 +10.1
13 at Georgia W 92–77 -3.6 +18.6
14 at Alabama L 97–100 -11.6 +8.6
14 vs Florida L 67–86 -10.8 -8.2
15 vs Missouri L 85–86 +5.6 -6.6
15 at Vanderbilt L 69–82 -8.7 -4.3
16 vs Ole Miss W 80–77 +8.6 -5.6
16 at Oklahoma W 75–71 -1.0 +5.0
17 at Arkansas L 84–99 -8.2 -6.8
17 vs Texas L 70–76 +2.6 -8.7
18 vs Kentucky W 96–85 +0.2 +10.8
18 at LSU W 94–91 +3.4 -0.4
19 N Oklahoma L 63–83 +1.7 -21.7
20 N Saint Mary's W 63–50 -3.2 +16.2
20 N Houston L 57–88 -12.5 -18.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #48 of 326 (21-10)2005–06: #38 of 326 (22-9)2006–07: #6 of 326 (27-7)2007–08: #18 of 328 (25-11)2008–09: #40 of 330 (24-10)2009–10: #39 of 335 (24-10)2010–11: #38 of 346 (24-9)2011–12: #167 of 345 (13-18)2012–13: #93 of 347 (18-15)2013–14: #120 of 351 (18-16)2014–15: #59 of 351 (21-12)2015–16: #15 of 351 (28-9)2016–17: #95 of 351 (16-15)2017–18: #61 of 351 (19-13)2018–19: #146 of 353 (14-18)2019–20: #159 of 353 (16-14)2020–21: #197 of 347 (8-10)2021–22: #62 of 358 (27-13)2022–23: #31 of 363 (25-10)2023–24: #38 of 362 (21-15)2024–25: #26 of 364 (23-11)2025–26: #36 of 365 (22-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 36 of 365 22–12 15.61 Power
2024–25 26 of 364 23–11 16.68 Power
2023–24 38 of 362 21–15 13.04 Power
2022–23 31 of 363 25–10 13.30 Power
2021–22 62 of 358 27–13 9.89 Power
2020–21 197 of 347 8–10 -2.09 Power
2019–20 159 of 353 16–14 37.60 MRI
2018–19 146 of 353 14–18 41.33 MRI
2017–18 61 of 351 19–13 98.13 MRI
2016–17 95 of 351 16–15 69.86 MRI
2015–16 15 of 351 28–9 162.90 MRI
2014–15 59 of 351 21–12 93.26 MRI
2013–14 120 of 351 18–16 59.65 MRI
2012–13 93 of 347 18–15 63.08 MRI
2011–12 167 of 345 13–18 37.55 MRI
2010–11 38 of 346 24–9 114.89 MRI
2009–10 39 of 335 24–10 121.00 MRI
2008–09 40 of 330 24–10 111.66 MRI
2007–08 18 of 328 25–11 144.03 MRI
2006–07 6 of 326 27–7 193.20 MRI
2005–06 38 of 326 22–9 107.30 MRI
2004–05 48 of 326 21–10 99.89 MRI