The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Miami

ACC · 26–9

Power+13.5#47 of 365
Résumé+13.14#32 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLouisville (78–73)
Worst lossCalifornia (85–86)
Schedule faced+6.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Jacksonville W 86–69 +24.9 -7.9
1 vs Bethune-Cookman W 101–61 +22.9 +17.1
2 vs Stetson W 102–61 +28.8 +12.2
3 N Florida L 68–82 -15.6 +1.6
3 vs Elon W 99–72 +21.0 +6.0
3 vs Delaware State W 97–41 +36.1 +19.9
4 N BYU L 62–72 -5.7 -4.3
4 N Georgetown W 78–65 +6.6 +6.4
5 at Ole Miss W 75–66 +1.1 +7.9
5 vs Southern Miss W 88–64 +20.3 +3.7
6 vs UL Monroe W 104–79 +35.1 -10.1
7 vs Florida International W 98–81 +18.9 -1.9
7 vs North Florida W 105–67 +29.6 +8.4
9 vs Pittsburgh W 76–69 +10.7 -3.7
10 at Wake Forest W 81–77 +1.9 +2.1
10 vs Georgia Tech W 91–81 +17.5 -7.5
11 at Notre Dame W 81–69 +5.8 +6.2
11 at Clemson L 59–69 -5.1 -4.9
12 vs Florida State L 63–65 +7.5 -9.5
12 at Syracuse W 85–76 +4.8 +4.2
13 vs Stanford W 79–70 +7.2 +1.8
13 vs California L 85–86 +9.2 -10.2
14 at Boston College W 74–68 +12.4 -6.4
15 vs North Carolina W 75–66 -1.4 +10.4
15 at NC State W 77–76 -3.0 +4.0
16 vs Virginia Tech W 67–66 +7.3 -6.3
16 at Virginia L 83–86 -7.5 +4.5
17 at Florida State W 83–73 +2.1 +7.9
17 vs Boston College W 76–54 +17.9 +4.1
18 at SMU W 77–69 -3.2 +11.2
18 vs Louisville L 89–92 -3.7 +0.7
19 N Louisville W 78–73 -6.4 +11.4
19 N Virginia L 62–84 -4.8 -17.2
20 N Missouri W 80–66 +0.8 +13.2
20 N Purdue L 69–79 -12.0 +2.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #10 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #78 of 326 (16-13)2005–06: #72 of 326 (18-16)2006–07: #143 of 326 (12-20)2007–08: #52 of 328 (23-11)2008–09: #63 of 330 (19-13)2009–10: #75 of 335 (20-13)2010–11: #73 of 346 (21-15)2011–12: #70 of 345 (20-13)2012–13: #10 of 347 (27-6)2013–14: #105 of 351 (17-16)2014–15: #55 of 351 (25-13)2015–16: #23 of 351 (27-8)2016–17: #55 of 351 (21-12)2017–18: #67 of 351 (22-10)2018–19: #130 of 353 (14-18)2019–20: #187 of 353 (15-16)2020–21: #214 of 347 (10-17)2021–22: #73 of 358 (26-11)2022–23: #29 of 363 (29-8)2023–24: #84 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #199 of 364 (7-24)2025–26: #47 of 365 (26-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 47 of 365 26–9 13.53 Power
2024–25 199 of 364 7–24 -2.02 Power
2023–24 84 of 362 15–17 7.03 Power
2022–23 29 of 363 29–8 13.52 Power
2021–22 73 of 358 26–11 8.51 Power
2020–21 214 of 347 10–17 -2.77 Power
2019–20 187 of 353 15–16 27.57 MRI
2018–19 130 of 353 14–18 48.73 MRI
2017–18 67 of 351 22–10 92.90 MRI
2016–17 55 of 351 21–12 97.98 MRI
2015–16 23 of 351 27–8 141.40 MRI
2014–15 55 of 351 25–13 95.08 MRI
2013–14 105 of 351 17–16 65.38 MRI
2012–13 10 of 347 27–6 161.84 MRI
2011–12 70 of 345 20–13 89.33 MRI
2010–11 73 of 346 21–15 84.22 MRI
2009–10 75 of 335 20–13 85.55 MRI
2008–09 63 of 330 19–13 93.74 MRI
2007–08 52 of 328 23–11 100.94 MRI
2006–07 143 of 326 12–20 43.47 MRI
2005–06 72 of 326 18–16 85.17 MRI
2004–05 78 of 326 16–13 74.35 MRI