The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Temple

American · 16–16

Power+0.1#163 of 365
Résumé-1.48#517 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSouth Florida (79–78)
Worst lossRice (74–80)
Schedule faced-2.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Delaware State W 83–65 +22.7 -4.7
2 vs La Salle W 90–63 +8.8 +18.2
2 vs Boston College L 71–76 +4.5 -9.4
3 vs Hofstra W 81–76 -3.6 +8.6
4 N UC San Diego L 76–91 -4.5 -10.4
4 N Princeton W 79–75 +4.8 -0.8
4 N Rhode Island L 75–90 -1.1 -13.8
5 at Villanova L 56–74 -18.2 +0.2
5 N Saint Joseph's L 69–70 -4.1 +3.1
6 vs Georgian Court non-D1 W 103–57 +40.7 +5.3
6 vs St. Francis (PA) W 95–67 +20.5 +7.5
7 at Davidson W 68–63 -5.7 +10.7
8 vs Princeton W 65–61 +7.5 -3.5
9 at Charlotte W 76–73 +0.3 +2.7
9 vs UTSA W 76–57 +17.5 +1.5
10 vs East Carolina W 75–67 +10.3 -2.3
11 at Memphis L 53–55 -6.6 +4.6
11 vs Florida Atlantic L 73–79 -1.3 -4.7
12 at Rice W 69–65 +2.6 +1.4
12 at UTSA W 70–64 +12.1 -6.1
13 vs Charlotte L 76–80 +5.7 -9.7
13 vs South Florida W 79–78 -9.7 +10.7
14 at East Carolina W 81–73 +4.8 +3.2
15 at Tulane L 66–77 +1.1 -12.1
15 vs North Texas L 62–65 -0.4 -2.6
16 vs UAB L 71–76 -1.5 -3.5
16 at Wichita State L 57–69 -11.2 -0.8
17 at Florida Atlantic L 73–77 -6.8 +2.8
17 vs Rice L 74–80 +8.1 -14.1
18 vs Tulane W 89–60 +6.5 +22.4
18 at Tulsa L 76–78 -12.2 +10.2
19 N Florida Atlantic L 59–63 -4.0 +0.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #25 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #96 of 326 (16-13)2005–06: #81 of 326 (17-15)2006–07: #166 of 326 (12-18)2007–08: #80 of 328 (21-13)2008–09: #64 of 330 (22-12)2009–10: #25 of 335 (29-6)2010–11: #30 of 346 (26-8)2011–12: #61 of 345 (24-8)2012–13: #66 of 347 (23-9)2013–14: #227 of 351 (9-22)2014–15: #37 of 351 (26-11)2015–16: #138 of 351 (21-12)2016–17: #190 of 351 (16-16)2017–18: #176 of 351 (15-16)2018–19: #84 of 353 (23-10)2019–20: #154 of 353 (14-17)2020–21: #180 of 347 (5-11)2021–22: #155 of 358 (17-12)2022–23: #135 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #191 of 362 (16-20)2024–25: #175 of 364 (17-15)2025–26: #163 of 365 (16-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 163 of 365 16–16 0.11 Power
2024–25 175 of 364 17–15 -0.66 Power
2023–24 191 of 362 16–20 -2.01 Power
2022–23 135 of 363 16–16 2.53 Power
2021–22 155 of 358 17–12 1.54 Power
2020–21 180 of 347 5–11 -0.89 Power
2019–20 154 of 353 14–17 40.97 MRI
2018–19 84 of 353 23–10 70.39 MRI
2017–18 176 of 351 15–16 37.60 MRI
2016–17 190 of 351 16–16 32.37 MRI
2015–16 138 of 351 21–12 55.50 MRI
2014–15 37 of 351 26–11 115.13 MRI
2013–14 227 of 351 9–22 13.98 MRI
2012–13 66 of 347 23–9 88.53 MRI
2011–12 61 of 345 24–8 93.27 MRI
2010–11 30 of 346 26–8 123.59 MRI
2009–10 25 of 335 29–6 140.51 MRI
2008–09 64 of 330 22–12 92.25 MRI
2007–08 80 of 328 21–13 76.55 MRI
2006–07 166 of 326 12–18 30.28 MRI
2005–06 81 of 326 17–15 78.00 MRI
2004–05 96 of 326 16–13 65.52 MRI