Charleston

CAA · 21–11

Power+0.4#158 of 365

Résumé+2.99#115 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winHofstra (66–64)
Worst lossStony Brook (106–112)
Schedule faced-2.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Tusculum non-D1	W 79–58	+41.0	-20.0
1	at	Liberty	L 75–90	-8.0	-7.0
1	N	Florida Atlantic	L 77–94	-3.8	-13.2
2	vs	South Carolina State	W 88–61	+20.2	+6.8
3	vs	Drake	L 62–71	+2.5	-11.5
3	N	Massachusetts	W 69–65	+2.2	+1.8
3	N	Yale	L 63–74	-9.8	-1.2
4	N	Evansville	W 78–59	+10.7	+8.3
4	vs	Belmont	L 73–96	-7.2	-15.8
6	at	South Florida	L 75–81	-14.9	+8.9
6	vs	Charlotte	W 74–67	+6.0	+1.0
7	vs	The Citadel	W 82–78	+18.9	-14.9
7	at	Northern Kentucky	W 85–74	-2.2	+13.2
9	vs	Drexel	W 72–63	+6.7	+2.3
9	at	Elon	W 85–81	+2.4	+1.6
10	vs	William & Mary	W 88–79	+2.2	+6.8
10	vs	Hampton	W 74–70	+10.4	-6.4
11	at	Towson	L 52–61	-3.3	-5.7
11	at	Stony Brook	L 106–112	+4.4	-10.4
12	vs	Campbell	W 87–83	+5.7	-1.7
12	vs	Elon	W 80–70	+7.8	+2.2
13	at	Hofstra	W 66–64	-8.7	+10.7
13	at	Northeastern	W 89–84	+6.8	-1.8
14	vs	North Carolina A&T	W 78–62	+14.0	+2.0
15	vs	UNC Wilmington	L 64–76	-1.9	-10.1
15	vs	Hofstra	L 62–66	-3.3	-0.7
15	at	Campbell	W 62–57	+0.3	+4.7
16	at	North Carolina A&T	W 74–61	+8.6	+4.4
16	vs	Monmouth	W 74–63	+5.2	+5.8
17	at	Hampton	W 85–71	+4.9	+9.1
18	at	UNC Wilmington	W 79–76	-7.3	+10.3
18	N	Towson	L 56–81	-0.6	-24.4

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #48 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	158 of 365	21–11	0.41	Power
2024–25	127 of 364	24–9	2.80	Power
2023–24	83 of 362	27–8	7.38	Power
2022–23	56 of 363	31–4	10.30	Power
2021–22	168 of 358	17–15	0.35	Power
2020–21	228 of 347	9–10	-4.14	Power
2019–20	174 of 353	16–14	33.85	MRI
2018–19	73 of 353	23–9	80.88	MRI
2017–18	82 of 351	26–8	83.56	MRI
2016–17	80 of 351	25–9	82.11	MRI
2015–16	118 of 351	17–14	62.76	MRI
2014–15	310 of 351	9–24	-28.13	MRI
2013–14	182 of 351	14–18	33.08	MRI
2012–13	83 of 347	24–9	70.94	MRI
2011–12	135 of 345	19–12	50.50	MRI
2010–11	48 of 346	26–11	106.01	MRI
2009–10	168 of 335	22–12	36.21	MRI
2008–09	98 of 330	27–9	68.42	MRI
2007–08	183 of 328	16–17	23.83	MRI
2006–07	108 of 326	22–11	60.78	MRI
2005–06	98 of 326	17–11	65.09	MRI
2004–05	95 of 326	18–10	66.10	MRI