The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Richmond

A-10 · 15–17

Power+0.1#164 of 365
Résumé-1.41#510 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBelmont (84–76)
Worst lossLoyola Chicago (66–69)
Schedule faced-0.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Southern Virginia non-D1 W 84–56 +40.7 -12.7
1 vs East Carolina W 87–72 +10.3 +4.7
2 vs William & Mary W 90–86 +1.9 +2.1
3 vs VMI W 87–54 +20.8 +12.2
3 vs Gardner-Webb W 102–67 +23.9 +11.1
4 N Furman L 72–73 -1.5 +0.5
4 N Charlotte W 71–66 +3.0 +2.0
5 at Belmont W 84–76 -13.0 +21.0
5 vs Old Dominion W 86–77 +9.3 -0.3
6 vs Southern Illinois W 93–84 -0.4 +9.4
7 at Elon L 70–73 +2.1 -5.1
7 vs The Citadel W 80–56 +18.6 +5.4
8 vs Charleston Southern L 72–77 +8.7 -13.7
9 vs George Washington L 85–99 -4.9 -9.1
9 at Fordham W 83–75 -1.0 +9.0
10 at St. Bonaventure W 89–80 -5.2 +14.2
10 vs Saint Joseph's L 65–67 -1.4 -0.6
11 vs La Salle W 74–53 +8.8 +12.2
11 at Saint Louis L 63–88 -19.1 -5.9
12 vs Rhode Island L 68–69 +1.6 -2.6
12 at George Washington L 69–85 -10.4 -5.6
13 at VCU L 69–77 -17.7 +9.7
13 vs Davidson L 54–79 -0.2 -24.8
14 at Rhode Island L 77–82 -3.9 -1.1
15 vs George Mason W 82–70 -4.1 +16.1
15 vs VCU L 67–78 -12.3 +1.3
16 at Davidson L 63–65 -5.7 +3.7
16 vs St. Bonaventure W 99–94 +0.2 +4.8
17 at Loyola Chicago L 66–69 +5.0 -8.0
18 vs Dayton L 60–65 -7.0 +2.0
18 at Duquesne L 77–79 -4.6 +2.6
19 N Loyola Chicago L 67–75 +7.8 -15.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #20 in 2019–20. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #206 of 326 (14-14)2005–06: #284 of 326 (13-17)2006–07: #308 of 326 (8-22)2007–08: #199 of 328 (16-15)2008–09: #157 of 330 (20-16)2009–10: #65 of 335 (26-9)2010–11: #37 of 346 (29-8)2011–12: #173 of 345 (15-15)2012–13: #100 of 347 (18-14)2013–14: #133 of 351 (19-14)2014–15: #67 of 351 (21-14)2015–16: #132 of 351 (16-16)2016–17: #139 of 351 (21-13)2017–18: #242 of 351 (12-20)2018–19: #226 of 353 (13-20)2019–20: #20 of 353 (24-7)2020–21: #57 of 347 (14-9)2021–22: #79 of 358 (24-13)2022–23: #139 of 363 (15-18)2023–24: #89 of 362 (23-10)2024–25: #229 of 364 (10-22)2025–26: #164 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 164 of 365 15–17 0.11 Power
2024–25 229 of 364 10–22 -4.18 Power
2023–24 89 of 362 23–10 6.40 Power
2022–23 139 of 363 15–18 2.19 Power
2021–22 79 of 358 24–13 7.76 Power
2020–21 57 of 347 14–9 9.24 Power
2019–20 20 of 353 24–7 117.02 MRI
2018–19 226 of 353 13–20 4.98 MRI
2017–18 242 of 351 12–20 6.25 MRI
2016–17 139 of 351 21–13 50.40 MRI
2015–16 132 of 351 16–16 57.38 MRI
2014–15 67 of 351 21–14 86.55 MRI
2013–14 133 of 351 19–14 49.61 MRI
2012–13 100 of 347 18–14 59.64 MRI
2011–12 173 of 345 15–15 34.10 MRI
2010–11 37 of 346 29–8 115.39 MRI
2009–10 65 of 335 26–9 94.65 MRI
2008–09 157 of 330 20–16 38.45 MRI
2007–08 199 of 328 16–15 18.24 MRI
2006–07 308 of 326 8–22 -47.23 MRI
2005–06 284 of 326 13–17 -20.08 MRI
2004–05 206 of 326 14–14 17.32 MRI