The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Middle Tennessee

CUSA · 17–15

Power+1.0#147 of 365
Résumé+0.50#159 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUAB (76–61)
Worst lossDelaware (88–89)
Schedule faced-1.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Milligan non-D1 W 100–51 +41.6 +7.4
1 vs Webster non-D1 W 109–56 +41.6 +11.4
2 at Evansville W 77–72 +8.6 -3.6
3 at Michigan L 61–86 -34.3 +9.3
4 N Murray State W 90–87 -2.5 +5.5
4 N George Washington L 79–92 -6.7 -6.3
4 N McNeese L 62–72 -8.9 -1.1
5 vs UAB W 76–61 -0.6 +15.6
5 vs Belmont L 62–83 -6.6 -14.4
7 vs Kennesaw State W 68–67 +1.3 -0.3
7 vs Cumberland (TN) non-D1 W 74–58 +41.6 -25.6
9 at Houston L 60–69 -29.9 +20.9
9 vs Louisiana Tech W 88–51 +4.4 +32.6
9 vs Sam Houston W 68–67 -0.5 +1.5
10 at UTEP L 80–83 +4.6 -7.6
10 at New Mexico State W 59–55 -1.3 +5.3
11 at Louisiana Tech L 58–59 -1.0 +0.0
11 vs Missouri State W 90–87 +6.5 -3.5
12 at Jacksonville State L 58–75 -0.8 -16.2
13 vs Liberty L 65–81 -2.0 -14.0
13 vs Western Kentucky L 60–65 +2.8 -7.8
14 vs Florida International L 84–88 +6.4 -10.4
14 at Delaware L 88–89 +7.4 -8.4
15 at Kennesaw State W 90–87 -4.2 +7.2
15 at Western Kentucky L 80–82 -2.7 +0.7
16 at Sam Houston L 70–78 -5.9 -2.1
16 vs Delaware W 78–66 +12.8 -0.8
17 vs UTEP W 77–67 +10.0 -0.0
17 vs New Mexico State W 86–85 +4.1 -3.1
18 at Florida International W 73–67 +1.0 +5.0
18 at Missouri State W 75–63 +1.1 +10.9
19 N Louisiana Tech L 69–80 +1.7 -12.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #14 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #68 of 326 (19-12)2005–06: #122 of 326 (16-12)2006–07: #181 of 326 (15-17)2007–08: #148 of 328 (17-15)2008–09: #99 of 330 (18-14)2009–10: #108 of 335 (19-14)2010–11: #134 of 346 (16-16)2011–12: #41 of 345 (26-7)2012–13: #14 of 347 (28-5)2013–14: #43 of 351 (24-9)2014–15: #144 of 351 (19-17)2015–16: #95 of 351 (25-10)2016–17: #18 of 351 (31-5)2017–18: #28 of 351 (25-8)2018–19: #289 of 353 (9-21)2019–20: #316 of 353 (5-23)2020–21: #310 of 347 (5-18)2021–22: #105 of 358 (26-11)2022–23: #110 of 363 (19-14)2023–24: #248 of 362 (14-19)2024–25: #131 of 364 (22-12)2025–26: #147 of 365 (17-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 147 of 365 17–15 1.02 Power
2024–25 131 of 364 22–12 2.61 Power
2023–24 248 of 362 14–19 -5.06 Power
2022–23 110 of 363 19–14 4.47 Power
2021–22 105 of 358 26–11 5.00 Power
2020–21 310 of 347 5–18 -10.72 Power
2019–20 316 of 353 5–23 -42.72 MRI
2018–19 289 of 353 9–21 -22.18 MRI
2017–18 28 of 351 25–8 128.45 MRI
2016–17 18 of 351 31–5 152.16 MRI
2015–16 95 of 351 25–10 75.49 MRI
2014–15 144 of 351 19–17 48.35 MRI
2013–14 43 of 351 24–9 111.57 MRI
2012–13 14 of 347 28–5 152.84 MRI
2011–12 41 of 345 26–7 111.45 MRI
2010–11 134 of 346 16–16 51.23 MRI
2009–10 108 of 335 19–14 64.72 MRI
2008–09 99 of 330 18–14 66.76 MRI
2007–08 148 of 328 17–15 41.80 MRI
2006–07 181 of 326 15–17 25.30 MRI
2005–06 122 of 326 16–12 52.11 MRI
2004–05 68 of 326 19–12 82.01 MRI