The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Central Connecticut

NEC · 18–12

Power-7.8#278 of 365
Résumé-4.94#609 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winRutgers (67–54)
Worst lossChicago State (51–70)
Schedule faced-11.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Vermont State - Johnson non-D1 W 117–55 +32.8 +29.2
1 at Quinnipiac L 49–71 -8.9 -13.1
2 at Boston College W 60–59 -8.9 +9.9
2 at Massachusetts L 77–84 -8.8 +1.8
3 at Rutgers W 67–54 -13.3 +26.3
4 vs Sacred Heart W 108–106 +3.2 -1.2
4 vs Johnson & Wales (RI) non-D1 W 122–57 +32.8 +32.2
5 at Seton Hall L 61–77 -20.8 +4.8
5 at Northeastern L 56–73 -1.4 -15.6
6 at Binghamton W 84–67 +7.3 +9.7
7 vs Fairfield L 70–84 +1.4 -15.4
9 at Long Island University L 78–84 -6.4 +0.4
9 vs New Haven W 72–61 +9.1 +1.9
10 vs Stonehill W 76–69 +8.2 -1.2
10 at Le Moyne W 69–59 +0.1 +9.9
11 at St. Francis (PA) W 98–90 +7.2 +0.8
12 at Mercyhurst L 61–79 -1.7 -16.3
12 vs Fairleigh Dickinson L 66–76 +8.2 -18.2
13 at Stonehill L 59–61 +2.7 -4.8
13 at Wagner W 62–55 +0.2 +6.8
13 vs Long Island University L 59–80 -1.0 -20.0
14 vs Chicago State W 78–67 +12.5 -1.5
14 vs Wagner W 84–67 +5.6 +11.4
15 at New Haven W 81–76 +3.6 +1.4
15 at Fairleigh Dickinson W 63–57 +2.8 +3.2
16 vs Le Moyne W 78–77 +5.6 -4.6
16 at Chicago State L 51–70 +7.0 -26.0
17 vs Mercyhurst W 80–78 +3.8 -1.8
17 vs St. Francis (PA) W 69–64 +12.6 -7.6
18 vs Wagner L 60–70 +5.6 -15.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #104 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #186 of 326 (12-16)2005–06: #104 of 326 (18-11)2006–07: #118 of 326 (22-12)2007–08: #160 of 328 (14-16)2008–09: #251 of 330 (13-17)2009–10: #287 of 335 (12-18)2010–11: #111 of 346 (19-12)2011–12: #211 of 345 (13-17)2012–13: #248 of 347 (13-17)2013–14: #324 of 351 (11-19)2014–15: #344 of 351 (5-26)2015–16: #351 of 351 (4-25)2016–17: #341 of 351 (6-23)2017–18: #290 of 351 (14-18)2018–19: #303 of 353 (9-20)2019–20: #349 of 353 (3-27)2020–21: #338 of 347 (5-16)2021–22: #351 of 358 (8-24)2022–23: #342 of 363 (10-22)2023–24: #276 of 362 (20-11)2024–25: #177 of 364 (25-7)2025–26: #278 of 365 (18-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 278 of 365 18–12 -7.79 Power
2024–25 177 of 364 25–7 -0.78 Power
2023–24 276 of 362 20–11 -6.61 Power
2022–23 342 of 363 10–22 -13.55 Power
2021–22 351 of 358 8–24 -16.99 Power
2020–21 338 of 347 5–16 -16.48 Power
2019–20 349 of 353 3–27 -118.44 MRI
2018–19 303 of 353 9–20 -32.52 MRI
2017–18 290 of 351 14–18 -18.84 MRI
2016–17 341 of 351 6–23 -71.53 MRI
2015–16 351 of 351 4–25 -97.44 MRI
2014–15 344 of 351 5–26 -79.53 MRI
2013–14 324 of 351 11–19 -45.35 MRI
2012–13 248 of 347 13–17 -7.17 MRI
2011–12 211 of 345 13–17 16.57 MRI
2010–11 111 of 346 19–12 64.22 MRI
2009–10 287 of 335 12–18 -22.35 MRI
2008–09 251 of 330 13–17 -3.59 MRI
2007–08 160 of 328 14–16 36.03 MRI
2006–07 118 of 326 22–12 54.30 MRI
2005–06 104 of 326 18–11 60.17 MRI
2004–05 186 of 326 12–16 23.74 MRI