UC Irvine
Big West · 3–0
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +24.8 avg | × 27% | +6.8 |
| Opponents faced | -22.6 avg | × 27% | -6.2 |
| Preseason prior | +3.0 | × 73% | +2.2 |
| Power | +2.8 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | Chapman non-D1 | W 92–66 | +39.0 | -13.0 | +0.2 |
| 2 | vs | San José State | W 91–79 | +12.0 | +0.0 | +0.3 |
| 3 | vs | Lincoln University (CA) non-D1 | W 90–40 | +39.0 | +11.0 | +0.1 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | +2.2 | |||||
| Power | +2.8 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | at | Stanford | -12.1 | 14% |
| 4 | N | San Diego | +8.2 | 77% |
| 4 | N | Loyola Marymount | +5.4 | 69% |
| 5 | at | Seattle U | +1.3 | 55% |
Season by season
Best finish: #48 in 2018–19. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 23–12 | #108 of 365 · 4.16 | – |
| 2024–25 | 32–7 | #67 of 364 · 9.70 | – |
| 2023–24 | 24–10 | #72 of 362 · 8.53 | – |
| 2022–23 | 23–12 | #104 of 363 · 4.90 | – |
| 2021–22 | 15–10 | #126 of 358 · 3.47 | – |
| 2020–21 | 18–9 | #99 of 347 · 5.65 | – |
| 2019–20 | 19–11 | – | #79 of 353 · 78.87 |
| 2018–19 | 30–6 | – | #48 of 353 · 100.00 |
| 2017–18 | 18–17 | – | #151 of 351 · 47.48 |
| 2016–17 | 21–15 | – | #100 of 351 · 67.51 |
| 2015–16 | 28–10 | – | #73 of 351 · 91.20 |
| 2014–15 | 21–13 | – | #104 of 351 · 68.23 |
| 2013–14 | 23–12 | – | #89 of 351 · 75.81 |
| 2012–13 | 18–15 | – | #158 of 347 · 35.46 |
| 2011–12 | 12–21 | – | #270 of 345 · -11.24 |
| 2010–11 | 13–19 | – | #238 of 346 · 3.54 |
| 2009–10 | 14–18 | – | #247 of 335 · 0.93 |
| 2008–09 | 12–19 | – | #248 of 330 · -3.21 |
| 2007–08 | 18–15 | – | #143 of 328 · 45.35 |
| 2006–07 | 15–18 | – | #180 of 326 · 26.24 |
| 2005–06 | 16–13 | – | #143 of 326 · 40.56 |
| 2004–05 | 16–13 | – | #185 of 326 · 23.78 |