The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Loyola Marymount

WCC · 15–17

Power-0.7#177 of 365
Résumé-1.71#537 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSan Francisco (84–82)
Worst lossPepperdine (89–90)
Schedule faced-0.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Lincoln University (CA) non-D1 W 137–54 +39.9 +43.1
1 vs Eastern Washington W 70–62 +5.4 +2.6
1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 94–72 +17.1 +4.9
2 at UTEP W 71–58 +2.8 +10.2
2 vs Troy W 74–63 -1.6 +12.6
3 at UC Santa Barbara W 78–74 -4.1 +8.1
4 N Florida Atlantic L 65–76 -4.9 -6.1
4 N Ohio W 70–58 +3.1 +8.9
4 N Stony Brook L 68–71 +6.0 -9.0
5 vs Saint Louis L 70–91 -14.5 -6.5
7 vs UC San Diego L 57–67 -2.7 -7.3
7 vs North Alabama W 91–57 +14.8 +19.2
8 vs Morgan State W 83–56 +18.0 +9.0
9 vs Saint Mary's L 73–78 -16.8 +11.8
9 vs Pacific W 80–71 +1.7 +7.3
9 at Washington State L 76–78 -4.6 +2.6
10 at Gonzaga L 47–82 -28.2 -6.8
10 vs San Francisco W 84–82 -2.1 +4.1
10 at Santa Clara L 72–103 -18.7 -12.3
11 at Oregon State L 70–76 -3.0 -3.0
11 vs Portland L 58–71 +8.2 -21.2
12 at Seattle U L 59–69 -7.5 -2.5
13 vs Oregon State L 69–72 +2.5 -5.5
13 vs Santa Clara L 73–104 -13.2 -17.8
14 at San Francisco W 84–75 -7.5 +16.5
14 vs San Diego W 83–63 +10.2 +9.8
15 at Pacific L 59–65 -3.8 -2.2
15 at Pepperdine L 89–90 +6.5 -7.5
16 at San Diego W 77–65 +4.8 +7.2
17 vs Washington State W 67–66 +0.8 +0.2
17 vs Seattle U L 66–71 -2.1 -2.9
18 N San Diego L 62–66 +7.5 -11.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #108 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #188 of 326 (11-17)2005–06: #162 of 326 (12-18)2006–07: #258 of 326 (13-18)2007–08: #328 of 328 (5-26)2008–09: #325 of 330 (3-28)2009–10: #174 of 335 (18-16)2010–11: #221 of 346 (11-21)2011–12: #137 of 345 (19-12)2012–13: #222 of 347 (10-22)2013–14: #234 of 351 (13-19)2014–15: #313 of 351 (8-23)2015–16: #229 of 351 (14-17)2016–17: #152 of 351 (15-15)2017–18: #239 of 351 (11-20)2018–19: #108 of 353 (20-12)2019–20: #232 of 353 (10-21)2020–21: #128 of 347 (13-9)2021–22: #202 of 358 (11-18)2022–23: #132 of 363 (19-12)2023–24: #174 of 362 (12-19)2024–25: #180 of 364 (17-15)2025–26: #177 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 177 of 365 15–17 -0.74 Power
2024–25 180 of 364 17–15 -1.14 Power
2023–24 174 of 362 12–19 -0.50 Power
2022–23 132 of 363 19–12 3.05 Power
2021–22 202 of 358 11–18 -1.97 Power
2020–21 128 of 347 13–9 2.64 Power
2019–20 232 of 353 10–21 4.91 MRI
2018–19 108 of 353 20–12 60.21 MRI
2017–18 239 of 351 11–20 7.42 MRI
2016–17 152 of 351 15–15 43.16 MRI
2015–16 229 of 351 14–17 8.19 MRI
2014–15 313 of 351 8–23 -29.25 MRI
2013–14 234 of 351 13–19 10.31 MRI
2012–13 222 of 347 10–22 7.25 MRI
2011–12 137 of 345 19–12 49.57 MRI
2010–11 221 of 346 11–21 13.56 MRI
2009–10 174 of 335 18–16 33.92 MRI
2008–09 325 of 330 3–28 -86.27 MRI
2007–08 328 of 328 5–26 -112.05 MRI
2006–07 258 of 326 13–18 -11.84 MRI
2005–06 162 of 326 12–18 34.36 MRI
2004–05 188 of 326 11–17 22.95 MRI