The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Fairleigh Dickinson

NEC · 11–21

Power-13.3#332 of 365
Résumé-12.05#708 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winCentral Connecticut (76–66)
Worst lossSt. Francis (PA) (82–85)
Schedule faced-10.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Iowa State L 50–88 -42.7 +4.7
1 at Saint Peter's L 83–93 -11.0 +1.0
2 at Texas L 58–93 -31.7 -3.3
2 at NJIT L 81–93 -2.5 -9.5
3 vs Saint Elizabeth non-D1 W 100–58 +27.3 +14.7
4 vs East Texas A&M L 65–70 +2.0 -7.0
4 vs Army L 73–81 +4.1 -12.1
5 at Providence L 64–94 -24.3 -5.7
5 vs Manor College non-D1 W 86–38 +27.3 +20.7
6 at Fordham L 54–75 -14.5 -6.5
7 vs Lehman College non-D1 W 76–42 +27.3 +6.7
8 at Boston College L 61–72 -14.4 +3.4
9 at Minnesota L 43–60 -23.1 +6.1
9 at Mercyhurst W 74–67 -7.2 +14.2
9 at St. Francis (PA) L 82–85 +1.6 -4.6
10 vs Chicago State W 70–63 +7.0 +0.0
10 at New Haven L 55–65 -1.9 -8.1
11 vs Long Island University L 59–66 -6.5 -0.5
12 vs Wagner W 68–61 +0.1 +6.9
12 at Central Connecticut W 76–66 -8.2 +18.2
13 vs Le Moyne L 74–87 +0.1 -13.1
13 at Stonehill L 57–58 -2.8 +1.8
13 at Wagner L 72–75 -5.4 +2.4
14 vs Stonehill W 74–58 +2.7 +13.3
14 vs Mercyhurst W 55–52 -1.7 +4.7
15 vs St. Francis (PA) W 66–59 +7.1 -0.1
15 vs Central Connecticut L 57–63 -2.8 -3.2
16 at Chicago State W 60–59 +1.5 -0.5
16 vs New Haven L 77–84 +3.6 -10.6
17 at Le Moyne L 59–76 -5.4 -11.6
17 at Long Island University L 60–74 -11.9 -2.1
18 at Mercyhurst L 61–70 -7.2 -1.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #122 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #122 of 326 (20-13)2005–06: #144 of 326 (20-12)2006–07: #231 of 326 (14-16)2007–08: #310 of 328 (8-20)2008–09: #326 of 330 (7-23)2009–10: #309 of 335 (11-21)2010–11: #320 of 346 (5-24)2011–12: #334 of 345 (3-26)2012–13: #340 of 347 (7-24)2013–14: #313 of 351 (10-21)2014–15: #326 of 351 (8-21)2015–16: #233 of 351 (18-15)2016–17: #270 of 351 (11-19)2017–18: #274 of 351 (13-18)2018–19: #170 of 353 (19-14)2019–20: #285 of 353 (10-19)2020–21: #293 of 347 (9-15)2021–22: #349 of 358 (4-22)2022–23: #276 of 363 (21-16)2023–24: #322 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #299 of 364 (13-20)2025–26: #332 of 365 (11-21) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 332 of 365 11–21 -13.31 Power
2024–25 299 of 364 13–20 -9.38 Power
2023–24 322 of 362 15–17 -11.29 Power
2022–23 276 of 363 21–16 -7.06 Power
2021–22 349 of 358 4–22 -16.26 Power
2020–21 293 of 347 9–15 -8.57 Power
2019–20 285 of 353 10–19 -19.06 MRI
2018–19 170 of 353 19–14 31.38 MRI
2017–18 274 of 351 13–18 -10.97 MRI
2016–17 270 of 351 11–19 -8.08 MRI
2015–16 233 of 351 18–15 5.88 MRI
2014–15 326 of 351 8–21 -44.36 MRI
2013–14 313 of 351 10–21 -35.99 MRI
2012–13 340 of 347 7–24 -93.06 MRI
2011–12 334 of 345 3–26 -75.52 MRI
2010–11 320 of 346 5–24 -53.60 MRI
2009–10 309 of 335 11–21 -46.27 MRI
2008–09 326 of 330 7–23 -86.57 MRI
2007–08 310 of 328 8–20 -50.41 MRI
2006–07 231 of 326 14–16 1.87 MRI
2005–06 144 of 326 20–12 40.10 MRI
2004–05 122 of 326 20–13 50.56 MRI