The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Chicago State

NEC · 7–25

Power-17.6#352 of 365
Résumé-12.76#715 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLoyola Chicago (84–75)
Worst lossSt. Francis (PA) (60–81)
Schedule faced-5.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at DePaul L 62–92 -23.9 -6.1
1 at Saint Louis L 86–108 -36.8 +14.8
2 at Butler L 66–98 -27.7 -4.3
2 vs UIC L 63–67 -18.8 +14.8
3 at Minnesota L 54–66 -27.4 +15.4
3 at Iowa L 54–93 -38.0 -1.0
4 at Purdue Fort Wayne L 77–90 -15.8 +2.8
4 at Youngstown State L 64–87 -18.7 -4.3
5 vs St. Xavier (IL) non-D1 W 85–62 +23.1 -0.1
5 at Illinois State L 53–95 -27.1 -14.9
6 at Loyola Chicago W 84–75 -12.6 +21.6
7 at Bowling Green L 55–76 -21.0 -0.0
7 at Indiana L 58–78 -34.5 +14.5
9 vs Wagner L 72–79 -4.1 -2.9
9 vs Long Island University L 55–74 -10.7 -8.3
10 at Fairleigh Dickinson L 63–70 -7.0 -0.0
10 at Stonehill L 82–85 -7.0 +4.0
11 vs Le Moyne L 57–72 -4.2 -10.8
12 vs New Haven L 56–62 -0.7 -5.3
12 at St. Francis (PA) L 60–81 -2.6 -18.4
12 at Mercyhurst L 59–61 -11.4 +9.4
13 vs Mercyhurst W 78–74 -6.0 +10.0
14 at Central Connecticut L 67–78 -12.5 +1.5
14 at New Haven W 63–57 -6.1 +12.1
15 vs St. Francis (PA) W 80–75 +2.9 +2.1
15 vs Stonehill W 68–55 -1.6 +14.6
15 at Le Moyne L 63–81 -9.6 -8.4
16 vs Fairleigh Dickinson L 59–60 -1.5 +0.5
16 vs Central Connecticut W 70–51 -7.0 +26.0
17 at Long Island University L 56–73 -16.2 -0.8
17 at Wagner L 61–80 -9.6 -9.4
18 at Long Island University L 75–79 -16.2 +12.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #159 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #272 of 326 (9-19)2005–06: #264 of 326 (11-19)2006–07: #278 of 326 (9-20)2007–08: #288 of 328 (11-17)2008–09: #159 of 330 (19-13)2009–10: #322 of 335 (9-23)2010–11: #345 of 346 (6-26)2011–12: #337 of 345 (4-26)2012–13: #285 of 347 (7-21)2013–14: #306 of 351 (13-19)2014–15: #335 of 351 (8-24)2015–16: #344 of 351 (4-28)2016–17: #344 of 351 (6-26)2017–18: #350 of 351 (3-29)2018–19: #353 of 353 (1-29)2019–20: #352 of 353 (1-25)2020–21: #346 of 347 (0-9)2021–22: #352 of 358 (7-25)2022–23: #303 of 363 (11-20)2023–24: #297 of 362 (13-19)2024–25: #361 of 364 (4-28)2025–26: #352 of 365 (7-25) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 352 of 365 7–25 -17.55 Power
2024–25 361 of 364 4–28 -18.71 Power
2023–24 297 of 362 13–19 -8.17 Power
2022–23 303 of 363 11–20 -9.07 Power
2021–22 352 of 358 7–25 -17.94 Power
2020–21 346 of 347 0–9 -26.34 Power
2019–20 352 of 353 1–25 -154.14 MRI
2018–19 353 of 353 1–29 -160.28 MRI
2017–18 350 of 351 3–29 -110.10 MRI
2016–17 344 of 351 6–26 -78.70 MRI
2015–16 344 of 351 4–28 -75.72 MRI
2014–15 335 of 351 8–24 -55.18 MRI
2013–14 306 of 351 13–19 -30.81 MRI
2012–13 285 of 347 7–21 -25.22 MRI
2011–12 337 of 345 4–26 -78.97 MRI
2010–11 345 of 346 6–26 -120.22 MRI
2009–10 322 of 335 9–23 -67.05 MRI
2008–09 159 of 330 19–13 37.72 MRI
2007–08 288 of 328 11–17 -25.62 MRI
2006–07 278 of 326 9–20 -22.29 MRI
2005–06 264 of 326 11–19 -11.44 MRI
2004–05 272 of 326 9–19 -14.22 MRI