The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Incarnate Word

Southland · 0–4

Power-14.8#344 of 365
Résumé-2.21#522 · wins above average
Movement-21down from #323 last week
Worst lossChicago State (54–66)
Schedule faced-3.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+1.5 avg opponent
Returning production1% of last season's win shares · #331 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production3.3 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-21.0 avg× 33%-7.0
Opponents faced-3.0 avg× 33%-1.0
Preseason prior-10.2× 67%-6.8
Power-14.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Oklahoma State L 60–91 -34.1 +3.1 -1.1
2 vs Chicago State L 54–66 +2.7 -14.8 -3.4
3 at UTEP L 60–79 -10.5 -8.5 -2.1
3 at UC Davis L 69–81 -11.2 -0.8 -1.4
Preseason prior (67% of the rating)-6.8
Power-14.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 at Texas State -20.1 3%
4 vs Central Baptist College non-D1 +21.3 97%
5 at Hawai'i -15.6 8%
6 at Grand Canyon -33.2 0%
10 at Arizona -42.7 0%

Season by season

Best finish: #128 in 2013–14. 13 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2013–14 (MRI Classic): #128 of 351 (21-6)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #165 of 351 (18-11)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #195 of 351 (17-12)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #305 of 351 (12-17)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #331 of 351 (7-21)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #341 of 353 (2-25)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #343 of 353 (6-22)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #322 of 347 (8-14)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #349 of 358 (7-25)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #345 of 363 (12-19)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #348 of 362 (8-23)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #247 of 364 (19-17)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #257 of 365 (12-19) MRI 2.0Classic 2013–14 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 12–19 #257 of 365 · -6.78 –
2024–25 19–17 #247 of 364 · -5.96 –
2023–24 8–23 #348 of 362 · -16.22 –
2022–23 12–19 #345 of 363 · -14.13 –
2021–22 7–25 #349 of 358 · -16.16 –
2020–21 8–14 #322 of 347 · -12.53 –
2019–20 6–22 – #343 of 353 · -80.46
2018–19 2–25 – #341 of 353 · -81.64
2017–18 7–21 – #331 of 351 · -55.29
2016–17 12–17 – #305 of 351 · -27.31
2015–16 17–12 – #195 of 351 · 23.95
2014–15 18–11 – #165 of 351 · 37.14
2013–14 21–6 – #128 of 351 · 53.81