Cleveland State
Horizon · 1–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -10.9 avg | × 27% | -3.0 |
| Opponents faced | -2.7 avg | × 27% | -0.7 |
| Preseason prior | -13.8 | × 73% | -10.0 |
| Power | -13.7 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Missouri | L 50–111 | -35.8 | -25.2 | -2.0 |
| 2 | vs | Michigan-Dearborn non-D1 | W 103–79 | +22.5 | +1.5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | at | Bowling Green | L 79–95 | -15.1 | -0.9 | -1.5 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | -10.0 | |||||
| Power | -13.7 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | N | West Florida | +1.7 | 56% |
| 3 | at | Alabama A&M | -3.8 | 36% |
| 4 | at | Xavier | -32.9 | 0% |
| 4 | vs | Kent State | -9.7 | 19% |
| 5 | vs | Case Western Reserve non-D1 | +22.5 | 98% |
| 9 | at | Pittsburgh | -26.4 | 1% |
Season by season
Best finish: #53 in 2010–11. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 11–22 | #315 of 365 · -11.98 | – |
| 2024–25 | 23–13 | #161 of 364 · -0.11 | – |
| 2023–24 | 21–15 | #188 of 362 · -2.23 | – |
| 2022–23 | 21–14 | #194 of 363 · -1.47 | – |
| 2021–22 | 20–11 | #160 of 358 · 0.72 | – |
| 2020–21 | 19–8 | #189 of 347 · -1.72 | – |
| 2019–20 | 10–21 | – | #308 of 353 · -35.51 |
| 2018–19 | 8–21 | – | #315 of 353 · -40.52 |
| 2017–18 | 12–23 | – | #319 of 351 · -39.17 |
| 2016–17 | 9–22 | – | #254 of 351 · 0.03 |
| 2015–16 | 9–23 | – | #307 of 351 · -31.98 |
| 2014–15 | 19–15 | – | #89 of 351 · 76.17 |
| 2013–14 | 21–12 | – | #80 of 351 · 80.40 |
| 2012–13 | 11–18 | – | #290 of 347 · -26.72 |
| 2011–12 | 22–11 | – | #77 of 345 · 85.03 |
| 2010–11 | 27–9 | – | #53 of 346 · 103.31 |
| 2009–10 | 16–17 | – | #176 of 335 · 32.69 |
| 2008–09 | 26–11 | – | #68 of 330 · 89.30 |
| 2007–08 | 21–13 | – | #103 of 328 · 69.16 |
| 2006–07 | 10–21 | – | #268 of 326 · -15.98 |
| 2005–06 | 10–18 | – | #256 of 326 · -8.27 |
| 2004–05 | 9–17 | – | #245 of 326 · -2.13 |