Missouri

SEC · 20–13

Power+12.7#50 of 365

Résumé+9.80#54 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winFlorida (76–74)
Worst lossNotre Dame (71–76)
Schedule faced+8.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	at	Howard	W 88–67	+11.9	+9.1
1	vs	Southeast Missouri State	W 89–84	+18.6	-13.6
1	vs	VMI	W 106–68	+33.4	+4.6
2	vs	Minnesota	W 83–60	+8.4	+14.6
3	vs	Prairie View A&M	W 91–73	+26.4	-8.4
3	vs	South Dakota	W 102–68	+23.7	+10.3
4	vs	South Carolina State	W 98–66	+32.5	-0.5
4	vs	Cleveland State	W 86–59	+26.1	+0.9
5	at	Notre Dame	L 71–76	+5.0	-10.0
5	N	Kansas	L 60–80	-7.6	-12.4
6	vs	Alabama State	W 85–77	+27.8	-19.8
6	vs	Bethune-Cookman	W 82–60	+22.1	-0.1
8	at	Illinois	L 48–91	-16.6	-26.4
9	vs	Florida	W 76–74	-13.6	+15.6
10	at	Kentucky	W 73–68	-8.2	+13.2
10	at	Ole Miss	L 69–76	+0.2	-7.2
11	vs	Auburn	W 84–74	-3.1	+13.1
11	at	LSU	L 70–78	+0.5	-8.5
12	vs	Georgia	L 72–74	-1.0	-1.0
12	vs	Oklahoma	W 88–87	+1.6	-0.6
13	at	Alabama	L 64–90	-14.5	-11.5
13	vs	Mississippi State	W 84–79	+9.3	-4.3
14	at	South Carolina	W 78–59	+4.5	+14.5
15	at	Texas A&M	W 86–85	-5.6	+6.6
15	vs	Texas	L 68–85	-0.2	-16.8
16	vs	Vanderbilt	W 81–80	-6.2	+7.2
16	at	Arkansas	L 86–94	-11.1	+3.1
17	vs	Tennessee	W 73–69	-7.7	+11.7
17	at	Mississippi State	W 88–64	+3.8	+20.2
18	at	Oklahoma	L 64–80	-3.9	-12.1
18	vs	Arkansas	L 84–88	-5.6	+1.6
19	N	Kentucky	L 72–78	-5.4	-0.6
20	N	Miami	L 66–80	-0.8	-13.2

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	50 of 365	20–13	12.71	Power
2024–25	38 of 364	22–12	14.17	Power
2023–24	158 of 362	8–24	1.29	Power
2022–23	77 of 363	25–10	8.77	Power
2021–22	154 of 358	12–21	1.61	Power
2020–21	71 of 347	16–10	7.81	Power
2019–20	128 of 353	15–16	50.86	MRI
2018–19	126 of 353	15–17	51.75	MRI
2017–18	81 of 351	20–13	85.07	MRI
2016–17	249 of 351	8–24	2.80	MRI
2015–16	243 of 351	10–21	-0.50	MRI
2014–15	274 of 351	9–23	-9.09	MRI
2013–14	72 of 351	23–12	85.37	MRI
2012–13	20 of 347	23–10	140.00	MRI
2011–12	11 of 345	29–5	157.42	MRI
2010–11	31 of 346	23–11	121.64	MRI
2009–10	26 of 335	23–11	136.83	MRI
2008–09	5 of 330	31–7	194.15	MRI
2007–08	78 of 328	16–16	79.14	MRI
2006–07	63 of 326	18–12	96.21	MRI
2005–06	220 of 326	12–16	11.71	MRI
2004–05	143 of 326	16–17	39.92	MRI