Pittsburgh

ACC · 13–20

Power+5.6#100 of 365

Résumé+2.96#116 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winOhio State (67–66)
Worst lossQuinnipiac (75–83)
Schedule faced+8.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Youngstown State	W 74–59	+9.9	+5.1
1	vs	Longwood	W 78–60	+12.9	+5.1
2	vs	Eastern Michigan	W 78–66	+14.7	-2.7
2	at	West Virginia	L 49–71	-9.0	-13.0
3	vs	Bucknell	W 84–50	+21.3	+12.7
3	N	UCF	L 67–77	-5.7	-4.3
3	vs	Quinnipiac	L 75–83	+9.9	-17.9
4	vs	Ohio State	W 67–66	-9.3	+10.3
5	vs	Texas A&M	L 73–81	-7.3	-0.7
5	vs	Hofstra	L 73–80	+1.9	-8.9
6	at	Villanova	L 61–79	-12.7	-5.3
7	vs	Binghamton	W 103–63	+26.2	+13.8
7	N	Penn State	W 80–46	+3.1	+30.9
9	at	Miami	L 69–76	-10.7	+3.7
9	vs	Clemson	L 68–73	-7.6	+2.6
10	vs	Syracuse	L 72–83	+2.3	-13.3
11	at	Georgia Tech	W 89–66	+4.1	+18.9
11	vs	Louisville	L 59–100	-11.6	-29.4
12	at	Boston College	L 62–65	+4.5	-7.5
12	vs	NC State	L 72–81	-5.5	-3.5
13	vs	Wake Forest	W 80–76	-0.5	+4.5
13	at	Clemson	L 52–63	-13.0	+2.0
14	at	Virginia	L 47–67	-15.4	-4.6
14	vs	SMU	L 67–86	-5.7	-13.3
15	vs	Duke	L 54–70	-23.5	+7.5
15	at	North Carolina	L 65–79	-14.8	+0.8
16	vs	Notre Dame	W 73–68	+3.3	+1.7
17	at	Stanford	L 67–75	-6.2	-1.8
17	at	California	W 72–56	-4.2	+20.2
18	vs	Florida State	L 74–75	-0.4	-0.6
18	at	Syracuse	W 71–69	-3.2	+5.2
19	N	Stanford	W 64–63	-3.5	+4.5
19	N	NC State	L 88–98	-8.2	-1.8

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	100 of 365	13–20	5.58	Power
2024–25	56 of 364	17–15	11.31	Power
2023–24	50 of 362	22–11	12.03	Power
2022–23	82 of 363	24–12	8.07	Power
2021–22	215 of 358	11–21	-2.99	Power
2020–21	135 of 347	10–12	2.22	Power
2019–20	155 of 353	16–17	40.37	MRI
2018–19	131 of 353	14–19	47.99	MRI
2017–18	317 of 351	8–23	-37.82	MRI
2016–17	143 of 351	16–17	47.84	MRI
2015–16	41 of 351	21–12	112.60	MRI
2014–15	103 of 351	19–15	68.65	MRI
2013–14	13 of 351	26–10	165.83	MRI
2012–13	7 of 347	24–8	168.40	MRI
2011–12	84 of 345	17–16	80.37	MRI
2010–11	8 of 346	28–6	177.40	MRI
2009–10	28 of 335	25–9	132.31	MRI
2008–09	3 of 330	31–5	211.12	MRI
2007–08	21 of 328	27–10	139.14	MRI
2006–07	10 of 326	29–8	168.40	MRI
2005–06	13 of 326	25–8	147.51	MRI
2004–05	26 of 326	20–9	118.27	MRI