The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Kent State

MAC · 24–10

Power+2.2#139 of 365
Résumé+4.53#102 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUNC Wilmington (86–77)
Worst lossCentral Michigan (85–87)
Schedule faced-3.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Troy L 97–103 +1.3 -7.3
1 vs Cornell W 110–102 +1.9 +6.1
2 vs UNC Wilmington W 86–77 -0.1 +9.1
2 N Cleveland State W 102–95 +12.8 -5.8
2 N Wright State W 76–72 -0.1 +4.1
3 vs Eastern Kentucky W 93–78 +12.5 +2.5
3 vs Cleveland State W 91–71 +15.6 +4.4
4 vs Penn State-Shenango non-D1 W 123–59 +42.8 +21.2
5 vs Austin Peay W 96–84 +5.2 +6.8
5 vs Roberts Wesleyan non-D1 W 111–68 +42.8 +0.2
6 at Portland L 78–88 +5.6 -15.6
7 at Massachusetts W 69–59 +1.2 +8.8
9 at Purdue L 60–101 -26.1 -14.9
9 vs Northern Illinois W 77–73 +19.8 -15.8
10 vs Bowling Green W 96–93 +4.2 -1.2
10 at Central Michigan L 85–87 +6.7 -8.7
11 at Buffalo W 87–81 +4.3 +1.7
11 vs Toledo W 87–84 +2.6 +0.4
12 vs Miami (OH) L 101–107 -3.5 -2.5
12 at Eastern Michigan W 76–75 +5.8 -4.8
13 vs Ohio W 72–57 +8.7 +6.3
13 at Akron L 52–69 -12.4 -4.6
14 at Toledo W 75–72 -2.8 +5.8
14 at Southern Miss L 65–66 +3.5 -4.5
15 vs Eastern Michigan W 95–91 +11.3 -7.3
15 at Ball State W 75–68 +8.5 -1.5
16 at Bowling Green W 78–71 -1.3 +8.3
17 vs Central Michigan W 83–81 +12.2 -10.2
17 vs Akron L 70–92 -6.9 -15.1
18 at Northern Illinois W 102–76 +14.3 +11.7
18 vs Western Michigan W 86–78 +14.3 -6.3
19 N Ohio W 86–75 +6.0 +5.0
19 N Akron L 68–75 -9.7 +2.7
20 at Illinois State L 58–79 -7.3 -13.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #31 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #85 of 326 (20-13)2005–06: #31 of 326 (25-9)2006–07: #83 of 326 (21-11)2007–08: #38 of 328 (27-7)2008–09: #126 of 330 (19-15)2009–10: #67 of 335 (24-10)2010–11: #99 of 346 (25-12)2011–12: #109 of 345 (21-11)2012–13: #99 of 347 (19-13)2013–14: #189 of 351 (16-16)2014–15: #113 of 351 (23-12)2015–16: #147 of 351 (19-13)2016–17: #94 of 351 (22-14)2017–18: #198 of 351 (17-17)2018–19: #138 of 353 (20-11)2019–20: #104 of 353 (18-12)2020–21: #99 of 347 (15-8)2021–22: #115 of 358 (23-11)2022–23: #57 of 363 (28-7)2023–24: #144 of 362 (17-17)2024–25: #116 of 364 (24-12)2025–26: #139 of 365 (24-10) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 139 of 365 24–10 2.17 Power
2024–25 116 of 364 24–12 3.49 Power
2023–24 144 of 362 17–17 2.33 Power
2022–23 57 of 363 28–7 10.22 Power
2021–22 115 of 358 23–11 4.52 Power
2020–21 99 of 347 15–8 6.25 Power
2019–20 104 of 353 18–12 64.10 MRI
2018–19 138 of 353 20–11 46.38 MRI
2017–18 198 of 351 17–17 25.98 MRI
2016–17 94 of 351 22–14 70.91 MRI
2015–16 147 of 351 19–13 51.66 MRI
2014–15 113 of 351 23–12 62.43 MRI
2013–14 189 of 351 16–16 31.21 MRI
2012–13 99 of 347 19–13 60.03 MRI
2011–12 109 of 345 21–11 66.00 MRI
2010–11 99 of 346 25–12 69.60 MRI
2009–10 67 of 335 24–10 92.90 MRI
2008–09 126 of 330 19–15 53.28 MRI
2007–08 38 of 328 27–7 116.73 MRI
2006–07 83 of 326 21–11 79.59 MRI
2005–06 31 of 326 25–9 114.08 MRI
2004–05 85 of 326 20–13 71.84 MRI