The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Alabama A&M

SWAC · 18–15

Power-12.7#325 of 365
Résumé-6.93#641 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTennessee State (80–53)
Worst lossAlcorn State (62–64)
Schedule faced-11.4 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-11.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Blue Mountain non-D1 W 80–60 +27.9 -7.9
1 at Indiana L 51–98 -29.7 -17.3
2 vs Charleston Southern W 68–64 -4.1 +8.1
2 vs Lindenwood W 74–65 -3.7 +12.7
4 at Clemson L 56–92 -31.3 -4.7
4 at Coastal Carolina L 60–67 -9.1 +2.1
5 vs Tennessee State W 80–53 -8.9 +35.9
5 at Lipscomb L 58–92 -16.1 -17.9
6 vs Arkansas Baptist non-D1 W 67–59 +27.9 -19.9
7 vs North Alabama W 68–60 +2.8 +5.2
7 at Ole Miss L 66–80 -25.2 +11.2
7 vs Chattanooga L 66–73 -5.2 -1.8
9 vs Fisk non-D1 W 90–58 +27.9 +4.1
9 at Arkansas-Pine Bluff L 83–95 -0.3 -11.7
10 at Mississippi Valley State W 71–51 +14.4 +5.6
10 vs Alcorn State L 62–64 +7.9 -9.9
11 vs Jackson State W 100–91 +5.9 +3.1
12 N Alabama State W 73–69 -0.3 +4.3
12 at Texas Southern L 74–89 -3.7 -11.3
13 at Prairie View A&M W 80–60 -4.4 +24.4
13 vs Florida A&M W 72–65 +2.9 +4.1
14 vs Bethune-Cookman L 62–80 -3.3 -14.7
14 at Southern L 68–81 -7.9 -5.1
15 at Grambling W 66–58 -5.7 +13.7
15 vs Mississippi Valley State W 72–65 +19.9 -12.9
16 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 82–70 +5.1 +6.9
16 at Florida A&M W 63–61 -2.6 +4.6
16 at Bethune-Cookman L 76–85 -8.8 -0.2
17 vs Alabama State L 88–89 +2.4 -3.4
18 vs Grambling W 77–63 -0.3 +14.3
18 vs Southern L 85–88 -2.4 -0.6
19 N Texas Southern W 85–74 -1.0 +12.0
19 N Prairie View A&M L 55–74 -1.7 -17.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
13 at Prairie View A&M -4.4 34%

Season by season

Best finish: #193 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #193 of 326 (18-14)2005–06: #203 of 326 (13-13)2006–07: #319 of 326 (10-20)2007–08: #238 of 328 (14-15)2008–09: #296 of 330 (8-19)2009–10: #284 of 335 (11-16)2010–11: #257 of 346 (13-15)2011–12: #311 of 345 (7-21)2012–13: #323 of 347 (9-20)2013–14: #274 of 351 (14-16)2014–15: #325 of 351 (9-20)2015–16: #264 of 351 (11-18)2016–17: #351 of 351 (2-27)2017–18: #351 of 351 (3-28)2018–19: #346 of 353 (5-27)2019–20: #340 of 353 (8-22)2020–21: #330 of 347 (6-9)2021–22: #337 of 358 (12-18)2022–23: #327 of 363 (15-18)2023–24: #335 of 362 (12-23)2024–25: #357 of 364 (10-22)2025–26: #325 of 365 (18-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 325 of 365 18–15 -12.69 Power
2024–25 357 of 364 10–22 -17.54 Power
2023–24 335 of 362 12–23 -13.57 Power
2022–23 327 of 363 15–18 -11.31 Power
2021–22 337 of 358 12–18 -13.55 Power
2020–21 330 of 347 6–9 -14.54 Power
2019–20 340 of 353 8–22 -70.14 MRI
2018–19 346 of 353 5–27 -89.40 MRI
2017–18 351 of 351 3–28 -125.82 MRI
2016–17 351 of 351 2–27 -123.64 MRI
2015–16 264 of 351 11–18 -11.72 MRI
2014–15 325 of 351 9–20 -44.22 MRI
2013–14 274 of 351 14–16 -8.96 MRI
2012–13 323 of 347 9–20 -58.32 MRI
2011–12 311 of 345 7–21 -44.25 MRI
2010–11 257 of 346 13–15 -6.46 MRI
2009–10 284 of 335 11–16 -20.14 MRI
2008–09 296 of 330 8–19 -37.54 MRI
2007–08 238 of 328 14–15 -3.39 MRI
2006–07 319 of 326 10–20 -57.37 MRI
2005–06 203 of 326 13–13 19.43 MRI
2004–05 193 of 326 18–14 20.70 MRI