The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UNC Wilmington

CAA · 27–7

Power+5.0#104 of 365
Résumé+5.62#89 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winYale (68–67)
Worst lossCampbell (70–85)
Schedule faced-5.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Mount Olive non-D1 W 106–77 +45.6 -16.6
2 at Kent State L 77–86 +0.1 -9.1
2 vs South Carolina Upstate W 73–60 +17.3 -4.3
3 vs East Carolina W 85–60 +15.2 +9.8
3 at Radford W 81–73 +6.5 +1.5
4 vs SE Louisiana W 70–57 +17.3 -4.3
4 vs Navy W 87–57 +7.3 +22.7
4 vs Gardner-Webb W 88–62 +28.8 -2.8
5 vs Marshall W 70–69 +8.8 -7.8
5 at Louisiana W 70–63 +14.3 -7.3
6 at Valparaiso W 73–70 +2.9 +0.1
7 vs Howard L 66–67 +9.6 -10.6
8 vs Columbia College (SC) non-D1 W 100–56 +45.6 -1.6
9 at North Carolina A&T W 87–78 +13.2 -4.2
9 vs Drexel W 65–53 +11.3 +0.7
9 vs Hampton W 49–45 +15.0 -11.0
10 at Northeastern W 87–78 +11.4 -2.4
10 at Stony Brook W 75–71 +9.0 -5.0
11 vs Campbell W 78–75 +10.3 -7.3
12 at William & Mary L 70–77 +1.4 -8.4
12 at Hampton W 75–67 +9.5 -1.5
13 at Towson W 82–73 +1.3 +7.7
14 vs William & Mary L 78–85 +6.8 -13.8
15 at Charleston W 76–64 +1.9 +10.1
15 vs Elon W 65–54 +12.4 -1.4
15 vs Hofstra W 70–66 +1.3 +2.7
16 vs Monmouth W 79–69 +9.8 +0.2
16 at Campbell W 73–68 +4.9 +0.1
17 vs North Carolina A&T W 88–65 +18.6 +4.4
18 vs Charleston L 76–79 +7.3 -10.3
18 at Elon W 76–57 +7.0 +12.0
18 N Campbell L 70–85 +7.6 -22.6
20 at Yale W 68–67 -8.0 +9.0
20 vs Dayton L 61–80 -2.1 -16.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #24 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #128 of 326 (18-10)2005–06: #24 of 326 (25-8)2006–07: #274 of 326 (7-22)2007–08: #147 of 328 (20-13)2008–09: #320 of 330 (7-25)2009–10: #280 of 335 (9-22)2010–11: #227 of 346 (13-18)2011–12: #274 of 345 (10-21)2012–13: #307 of 347 (9-20)2013–14: #297 of 351 (9-23)2014–15: #182 of 351 (18-14)2015–16: #66 of 351 (25-8)2016–17: #26 of 351 (29-6)2017–18: #238 of 351 (11-21)2018–19: #261 of 353 (9-23)2019–20: #318 of 353 (7-22)2020–21: #233 of 347 (7-10)2021–22: #172 of 358 (27-9)2022–23: #141 of 363 (24-10)2023–24: #112 of 362 (21-10)2024–25: #97 of 364 (27-8)2025–26: #104 of 365 (27-7) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 104 of 365 27–7 5.02 Power
2024–25 97 of 364 27–8 5.80 Power
2023–24 112 of 362 21–10 4.75 Power
2022–23 141 of 363 24–10 2.12 Power
2021–22 172 of 358 27–9 0.13 Power
2020–21 233 of 347 7–10 -4.71 Power
2019–20 318 of 353 7–22 -45.77 MRI
2018–19 261 of 353 9–23 -7.35 MRI
2017–18 238 of 351 11–21 7.43 MRI
2016–17 26 of 351 29–6 128.36 MRI
2015–16 66 of 351 25–8 96.98 MRI
2014–15 182 of 351 18–14 31.41 MRI
2013–14 297 of 351 9–23 -23.74 MRI
2012–13 307 of 347 9–20 -39.24 MRI
2011–12 274 of 345 10–21 -13.50 MRI
2010–11 227 of 346 13–18 10.05 MRI
2009–10 280 of 335 9–22 -17.99 MRI
2008–09 320 of 330 7–25 -67.27 MRI
2007–08 147 of 328 20–13 41.90 MRI
2006–07 274 of 326 7–22 -19.26 MRI
2005–06 24 of 326 25–8 118.18 MRI
2004–05 128 of 326 18–10 48.08 MRI