Elon

CAA · 14–18

Power-4.7#230 of 365

Résumé-4.56#604 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winHofstra (89–85)
Worst lossNorth Carolina A&T (82–102)
Schedule faced-4.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Belmont Abbey non-D1	W 99–51	+35.9	+12.1
1	at	UNC Greensboro	W 92–90	+0.1	+1.9
2	at	Marshall	L 89–96	-6.3	-0.7
2	vs	Gardner-Webb	W 95–84	+19.1	-8.1
3	at	Miami	L 72–99	-21.0	-6.0
4	at	App State	W 88–53	-6.6	+41.6
4	vs	Mercer	L 84–91	-2.7	-4.3
5	vs	Furman	L 88–97	-3.6	-5.4
5	at	Wofford	W 73–52	-4.8	+25.8
6	vs	Northern Illinois	W 85–79	+12.9	-6.9
7	vs	Richmond	W 73–70	-2.1	+5.1
7	at	Virginia Tech	L 81–82	-16.4	+15.4
8	vs	Greensboro College non-D1	W 97–63	+35.9	-1.9
9	vs	Northeastern	W 103–91	+7.1	+4.9
9	vs	Charleston	L 81–85	-2.4	-1.6
10	at	North Carolina A&T	W 69–64	+3.5	+1.5
10	vs	Campbell	W 83–82	+0.6	+0.4
11	at	Northeastern	L 78–85	+1.7	-8.7
11	at	Hofstra	W 89–85	-13.8	+17.8
12	vs	Towson	L 59–72	-3.0	-10.0
12	at	Charleston	L 70–80	-7.8	-2.2
13	vs	William & Mary	W 79–76	-2.9	+5.9
13	vs	Stony Brook	L 68–72	+4.8	-8.8
14	at	Hampton	L 79–87	-0.2	-7.8
14	vs	Drexel	L 77–82	+1.5	-6.5
15	at	UNC Wilmington	L 54–65	-12.4	+1.4
15	at	William & Mary	W 81–78	-8.3	+11.3
16	vs	North Carolina A&T	L 82–102	+8.9	-28.9
17	at	Towson	L 56–58	-8.4	+6.4
17	at	Monmouth	L 57–73	-5.4	-10.6
18	vs	UNC Wilmington	L 57–76	-7.0	-12.0
18	N	William & Mary	L 62–72	-5.6	-4.4

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #146 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	230 of 365	14–18	-4.70	Power
2024–25	217 of 364	17–16	-3.48	Power
2023–24	321 of 362	13–19	-11.21	Power
2022–23	331 of 363	8–24	-11.70	Power
2021–22	255 of 358	10–22	-6.20	Power
2020–21	216 of 347	10–9	-2.97	Power
2019–20	294 of 353	10–21	-25.87	MRI
2018–19	317 of 353	9–21	-41.58	MRI
2017–18	263 of 351	14–18	-4.17	MRI
2016–17	146 of 351	18–14	46.69	MRI
2015–16	198 of 351	16–16	22.62	MRI
2014–15	257 of 351	15–18	0.97	MRI
2013–14	181 of 351	18–14	33.11	MRI
2012–13	163 of 347	19–11	34.83	MRI
2011–12	245 of 345	15–16	0.06	MRI
2010–11	247 of 346	14–17	-2.08	MRI
2009–10	299 of 335	9–23	-34.07	MRI
2008–09	291 of 330	11–20	-27.84	MRI
2007–08	230 of 328	14–19	1.60	MRI
2006–07	289 of 326	7–23	-30.38	MRI
2005–06	211 of 326	15–14	15.27	MRI
2004–05	294 of 326	8–22	-28.98	MRI