The MRI
2025–26 · Final

NC State

ACC · 20–14

Power+13.8#45 of 365
Résumé+10.69#44 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winNorth Carolina (82–58)
Worst lossGeorgia Tech (74–78)
Schedule faced+9.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs North Carolina Central W 114–66 +30.7 +17.3
1 vs UAB W 94–70 +12.2 +11.8
2 vs UNC Greensboro W 110–64 +24.0 +22.0
3 vs VCU W 85–79 +1.4 +4.6
4 N Seton Hall L 74–85 +3.5 -14.5
4 N Boise State W 81–70 +2.9 +8.1
4 N Texas L 97–102 -1.9 -3.1
5 at Auburn L 73–83 -7.5 -2.5
5 vs UNC Asheville W 75–63 +20.6 -8.6
6 vs Liberty W 85–45 +10.8 +29.2
6 vs Kansas L 76–77 -3.8 +2.8
7 vs Texas Southern W 108–72 +28.2 +7.8
7 N Ole Miss W 76–62 +4.0 +10.0
9 vs Wake Forest W 70–57 +7.7 +5.3
9 vs Virginia L 61–76 -1.8 -13.2
10 at Boston College W 79–71 +12.7 -4.7
10 at Florida State W 113–69 +2.3 +41.7
11 vs Georgia Tech L 74–78 +17.7 -21.7
12 at Clemson W 80–76 -4.8 +8.8
12 at Pittsburgh W 81–72 +5.5 +3.5
13 vs Syracuse W 88–68 +10.5 +9.5
13 at Wake Forest W 96–78 +2.2 +15.8
14 at SMU W 84–83 -2.9 +3.9
14 vs Virginia Tech W 82–73 +7.5 +1.5
15 at Louisville L 77–118 -8.9 -32.1
15 vs Miami L 76–77 +3.0 -4.0
16 vs North Carolina W 82–58 -1.2 +25.2
17 at Virginia L 61–90 -7.2 -21.8
17 at Notre Dame L 90–96 +6.0 -12.0
18 vs Duke L 64–93 -15.3 -13.7
18 vs Stanford L 84–85 +7.5 -8.5
19 N Pittsburgh W 98–88 +8.2 +1.8
19 N Virginia L 74–81 -4.5 -2.5
20 N Texas L 66–68 -1.9 -0.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #35 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #42 of 326 (21-14)2005–06: #48 of 326 (22-10)2006–07: #119 of 326 (20-16)2007–08: #202 of 328 (15-16)2008–09: #117 of 330 (16-14)2009–10: #109 of 335 (20-16)2010–11: #137 of 346 (15-16)2011–12: #45 of 345 (24-14)2012–13: #35 of 347 (24-10)2013–14: #86 of 351 (22-14)2014–15: #46 of 351 (22-14)2015–16: #112 of 351 (16-17)2016–17: #181 of 351 (15-17)2017–18: #63 of 351 (21-12)2018–19: #40 of 353 (24-12)2019–20: #59 of 353 (20-12)2020–21: #96 of 347 (14-11)2021–22: #153 of 358 (11-21)2022–23: #60 of 363 (23-11)2023–24: #54 of 362 (26-15)2024–25: #110 of 364 (12-19)2025–26: #45 of 365 (20-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 45 of 365 20–14 13.78 Power
2024–25 110 of 364 12–19 4.06 Power
2023–24 54 of 362 26–15 11.06 Power
2022–23 60 of 363 23–11 10.03 Power
2021–22 153 of 358 11–21 1.62 Power
2020–21 96 of 347 14–11 6.36 Power
2019–20 59 of 353 20–12 87.41 MRI
2018–19 40 of 353 24–12 103.78 MRI
2017–18 63 of 351 21–12 96.18 MRI
2016–17 181 of 351 15–17 35.47 MRI
2015–16 112 of 351 16–17 65.48 MRI
2014–15 46 of 351 22–14 103.88 MRI
2013–14 86 of 351 22–14 76.47 MRI
2012–13 35 of 347 24–10 118.02 MRI
2011–12 45 of 345 24–14 107.22 MRI
2010–11 137 of 346 15–16 50.23 MRI
2009–10 109 of 335 20–16 64.04 MRI
2008–09 117 of 330 16–14 57.42 MRI
2007–08 202 of 328 15–16 16.61 MRI
2006–07 119 of 326 20–16 54.14 MRI
2005–06 48 of 326 22–10 99.81 MRI
2004–05 42 of 326 21–14 102.54 MRI