William & Mary

CAA · 20–12

Power+0.9#150 of 365

Résumé+1.22#141 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winHofstra (89–82)
Worst lossHampton (74–77)
Schedule faced-4.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Georgian Court non-D1	W 110–63	+41.5	+5.5
1	at	Norfolk State	W 81–78	+6.0	-3.0
2	at	Richmond	L 86–90	-1.9	-2.1
2	at	St. John's	L 60–93	-25.3	-7.7
3	at	Bowling Green	W 82–74	-2.5	+10.5
3	vs	Regent non-D1	W 104–57	+41.5	+5.5
4	N	UTEP	W 74–63	+7.2	+3.8
4	N	Abilene Christian	W 92–58	+7.2	+26.8
4	vs	Old Dominion	W 88–75	+10.2	+2.8
5	at	Duquesne	W 83–79	-3.8	+7.8
5	at	George Washington	L 86–99	-9.6	-3.4
7	vs	Radford	W 96–83	+7.9	+5.1
9	vs	Towson	W 84–70	+2.6	+11.3
9	vs	Stony Brook	W 76–57	+10.4	+8.6
10	at	Charleston	L 79–88	-2.2	-6.8
10	at	Monmouth	L 70–81	+0.2	-11.2
10	at	Drexel	L 58–64	+1.7	-7.7
11	vs	North Carolina A&T	W 97–89	+14.5	-6.5
12	vs	UNC Wilmington	W 77–70	-1.4	+8.4
12	vs	Hofstra	W 89–82	-2.8	+9.8
13	at	Elon	L 76–79	+2.9	-5.9
13	vs	Campbell	L 96–104	+6.2	-14.2
14	at	UNC Wilmington	W 85–78	-6.8	+13.8
14	at	Hampton	L 74–77	+5.4	-8.4
15	at	Northeastern	W 94–67	+7.3	+19.7
15	vs	Elon	L 78–81	+8.3	-11.3
16	at	Campbell	L 83–84	+0.8	-1.8
17	vs	Northeastern	W 84–77	+12.7	-5.7
17	at	North Carolina A&T	W 91–88	+9.1	-6.1
18	vs	Hampton	W 94–85	+10.9	-1.9
18	N	Elon	W 72–62	+5.6	+4.4
19	N	Hofstra	L 61–92	-5.5	-25.5

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #84 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	150 of 365	20–12	0.91	Power
2024–25	238 of 364	17–15	-4.94	Power
2023–24	319 of 362	10–23	-11.10	Power
2022–23	322 of 363	13–20	-10.73	Power
2021–22	341 of 358	5–27	-14.34	Power
2020–21	266 of 347	7–10	-6.83	Power
2019–20	170 of 353	20–11	34.49	MRI
2018–19	209 of 353	13–17	12.85	MRI
2017–18	167 of 351	19–12	40.45	MRI
2016–17	149 of 351	17–14	45.36	MRI
2015–16	84 of 351	20–11	80.99	MRI
2014–15	120 of 351	20–13	57.07	MRI
2013–14	179 of 351	20–12	33.64	MRI
2012–13	234 of 347	12–17	0.38	MRI
2011–12	322 of 345	6–25	-55.74	MRI
2010–11	271 of 346	10–22	-12.36	MRI
2009–10	139 of 335	22–11	49.87	MRI
2008–09	230 of 330	10–20	3.53	MRI
2007–08	212 of 328	17–16	12.54	MRI
2006–07	201 of 326	15–15	16.72	MRI
2005–06	249 of 326	8–20	-4.91	MRI
2004–05	298 of 326	8–21	-35.83	MRI