Fairfield

Metro · 21–13

Power-6.5#259 of 365

Résumé-2.98#581 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winSiena (72–58)
Worst lossCanisius (81–85)
Schedule faced-8.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	at	Penn State	L 68–76	-11.7	+3.7
1	at	NJIT	W 74–53	+4.3	+16.7
2	at	Seton Hall	L 59–82	-19.5	-3.5
2	vs	Stonehill	W 73–71	+9.5	-7.5
2	vs	Loyola Maryland	W 85–82	+8.4	-5.4
3	at	Le Moyne	W 97–83	+1.5	+12.5
4	vs	Columbia	L 77–106	-2.5	-26.5
4	vs	New Hampshire	W 72–68	+10.9	-6.9
5	at	Manhattan	L 66–70	+3.7	-7.7
5	at	Merrimack	L 63–74	-8.8	-2.2
6	vs	Monmouth	W 73–65	-1.7	+9.7
7	at	Central Connecticut	W 84–70	-1.4	+15.4
8	vs	City College NY non-D1	W 121–58	+34.1	+28.9
9	vs	Saint Peter's	L 66–70	+1.4	-5.3
9	at	Canisius	L 81–85	+7.2	-11.2
9	at	Niagara	W 83–75	+5.3	+2.7
10	vs	Rider	W 68–62	+14.2	-8.2
11	vs	Manhattan	W 98–62	+9.2	+26.8
11	at	Marist	L 67–82	-7.7	-7.3
12	at	Siena	L 77–85	-8.3	+0.3
12	vs	Niagara	W 62–61	+10.7	-9.7
12	vs	Canisius	W 61–55	+12.7	-6.7
13	at	Iona	W 71–70	-4.4	+5.4
13	vs	Quinnipiac	L 65–72	-2.1	-4.9
14	at	Sacred Heart	W 92–87	-1.0	+6.0
14	vs	Marist	W 63–60	-2.3	+5.3
15	at	Saint Peter's	L 74–83	-4.1	-4.9
16	vs	Sacred Heart	W 78–68	+4.5	+5.5
16	at	Quinnipiac	W 85–79	-7.6	+13.6
17	vs	Siena	W 72–58	-2.9	+16.9
17	vs	Mount St. Mary's	L 47–69	+3.7	-25.7
18	N	Manhattan	W 71–60	+6.5	+4.5
18	N	Saint Peter's	W 74–55	-1.4	+20.4
19	N	Siena	L 61–76	-5.6	-9.4

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #66 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	259 of 365	21–13	-6.46	Power
2024–25	316 of 364	12–20	-11.04	Power
2023–24	178 of 362	24–13	-0.94	Power
2022–23	257 of 363	13–18	-5.65	Power
2021–22	241 of 358	15–18	-4.76	Power
2020–21	312 of 347	10–17	-10.82	Power
2019–20	278 of 353	12–20	-14.96	MRI
2018–19	274 of 353	9–22	-14.06	MRI
2017–18	210 of 351	17–16	22.00	MRI
2016–17	225 of 351	16–15	14.12	MRI
2015–16	209 of 351	19–14	17.23	MRI
2014–15	299 of 351	7–24	-25.45	MRI
2013–14	308 of 351	7–25	-32.11	MRI
2012–13	161 of 347	19–15	35.07	MRI
2011–12	123 of 345	17–14	59.52	MRI
2010–11	66 of 346	25–8	88.91	MRI
2009–10	107 of 335	23–11	64.88	MRI
2008–09	167 of 330	17–15	32.83	MRI
2007–08	233 of 328	14–16	-0.40	MRI
2006–07	198 of 326	13–19	18.02	MRI
2005–06	273 of 326	9–19	-14.45	MRI
2004–05	176 of 326	14–15	26.77	MRI