Long Island University
NEC · 0–4
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -9.5 avg | × 33% | -3.2 |
| Opponents faced | +1.7 avg | × 33% | +0.6 |
| Preseason prior | -8.4 | × 67% | -5.6 |
| Power | -8.2 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Florida Atlantic | L 60–74 | -12.4 | -1.6 | -0.9 |
| 2 | at | Seton Hall | L 60–67 | -21.7 | +14.7 | +0.7 |
| 2 | at | La Salle | L 80–88 | -6.7 | -1.3 | -0.7 |
| 3 | at | Towson | L 46–66 | -10.9 | -9.1 | -1.7 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | -5.6 | |||||
| Power | -8.2 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Fordham | -13.1 | 12% |
| 4 | vs | St. Thomas-Minnesota | -6.0 | 29% |
| 4 | vs | UNC Wilmington | -9.1 | 20% |
| 4 | vs | Fairfield | +2.8 | 60% |
| 10 | at | Florida | -40.0 | 0% |
Season by season
Best finish: #58 in 2010–11. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 24–11 | #211 of 365 · -3.78 | – |
| 2024–25 | 17–16 | #300 of 364 · -9.58 | – |
| 2023–24 | 7–22 | #355 of 362 · -18.11 | – |
| 2022–23 | 3–26 | #361 of 363 · -20.02 | – |
| 2021–22 | 16–14 | #222 of 358 · -3.27 | – |
| 2020–21 | 9–9 | #257 of 347 · -6.34 | – |
| 2019–20 | 14–18 | – | #277 of 353 · -13.97 |
| 2018–19 | 15–16 | – | #212 of 353 · 11.23 |
| 2017–18 | 18–17 | – | #233 of 351 · 10.97 |
| 2016–17 | 20–12 | – | #193 of 351 · 30.89 |
| 2015–16 | 16–15 | – | #218 of 351 · 11.79 |
| 2014–15 | 12–18 | – | #270 of 351 · -6.40 |
| 2013–14 | 9–20 | – | #327 of 351 · -48.92 |
| 2012–13 | 20–13 | – | #129 of 347 · 48.06 |
| 2011–12 | 28–9 | – | #119 of 345 · 60.98 |
| 2010–11 | 27–6 | – | #58 of 346 · 99.47 |
| 2009–10 | 14–17 | – | #246 of 335 · 1.62 |
| 2008–09 | 16–14 | – | #161 of 330 · 36.68 |
| 2007–08 | 15–15 | – | #150 of 328 · 41.10 |
| 2006–07 | 10–19 | – | #291 of 326 · -31.87 |
| 2005–06 | 12–16 | – | #275 of 326 · -15.06 |
| 2004–05 | 14–14 | – | #246 of 326 · -2.39 |