The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Long Island University

NEC · 24–11

Power-4.1#221 of 365
Résumé-0.24#192 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winJames Madison (88–79)
Worst lossNew Haven (52–55)
Schedule faced-6.6 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-10.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Notre Dame L 67–89 -11.8 -10.2
1 at IU Indianapolis W 94–90 +5.8 -1.8
2 at Air Force W 76–72 +11.4 -7.4
2 vs James Madison W 88–79 +0.7 +8.3
3 at Fordham L 53–69 -5.2 -10.8
3 at Illinois L 58–98 -33.4 -6.6
4 at Missouri State W 75–61 -4.1 +18.1
5 vs Winthrop L 92–94 -4.3 +2.3
5 at Lehigh W 87–82 +2.6 +2.4
6 vs La Salle W 70–60 +4.6 +5.4
7 at Mississippi State L 83–87 -13.0 +9.0
7 at Florida International L 79–86 -4.1 -2.9
9 at Georgia L 74–89 -23.3 +8.3
9 vs Central Connecticut W 84–78 +6.4 -0.4
9 at Chicago State W 74–55 +10.7 +8.3
10 vs Mercyhurst W 60–58 +7.5 -5.5
10 vs St. Francis (PA) W 67–63 +16.3 -12.3
11 at Fairleigh Dickinson W 66–59 +6.5 +0.5
12 at Le Moyne L 77–83 +3.8 -9.8
12 at Stonehill W 66–63 +6.4 -3.4
13 vs Le Moyne W 83–61 +9.3 +12.7
13 at Central Connecticut W 80–59 +1.0 +20.0
14 vs New Haven W 60–55 +12.8 -7.8
14 vs Stonehill W 61–54 +11.9 -4.9
15 at Wagner W 67–57 +3.9 +6.1
15 at New Haven L 52–55 +7.3 -10.3
16 vs Wagner W 83–65 +9.3 +8.7
16 at St. Francis (PA) W 91–89 +10.8 -8.8
16 at Mercyhurst L 83–91 +2.0 -10.0
17 vs Chicago State W 73–56 +16.2 +0.8
17 vs Fairleigh Dickinson W 74–60 +11.9 +2.1
18 vs Chicago State W 79–75 +16.2 -12.2
18 vs Wagner W 64–56 +9.3 -1.3
19 vs Mercyhurst W 79–70 +7.5 +1.5
20 N Arizona L 58–92 -35.5 +1.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
13 vs Wagner +9.3 80%

Season by season

Best finish: #58 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #246 of 326 (14-14)2005–06: #275 of 326 (12-16)2006–07: #291 of 326 (10-19)2007–08: #150 of 328 (15-15)2008–09: #161 of 330 (16-14)2009–10: #246 of 335 (14-17)2010–11: #58 of 346 (27-6)2011–12: #119 of 345 (28-9)2012–13: #129 of 347 (20-13)2013–14: #327 of 351 (9-20)2014–15: #270 of 351 (12-18)2015–16: #218 of 351 (16-15)2016–17: #193 of 351 (20-12)2017–18: #233 of 351 (18-17)2018–19: #212 of 353 (15-16)2019–20: #277 of 353 (14-18)2020–21: #237 of 347 (9-9)2021–22: #229 of 358 (16-14)2022–23: #360 of 363 (3-26)2023–24: #356 of 362 (7-22)2024–25: #302 of 364 (17-16)2025–26: #221 of 365 (24-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 221 of 365 24–11 -4.10 Power
2024–25 302 of 364 17–16 -9.56 Power
2023–24 356 of 362 7–22 -18.16 Power
2022–23 360 of 363 3–26 -19.51 Power
2021–22 229 of 358 16–14 -3.76 Power
2020–21 237 of 347 9–9 -4.97 Power
2019–20 277 of 353 14–18 -13.97 MRI
2018–19 212 of 353 15–16 11.23 MRI
2017–18 233 of 351 18–17 10.97 MRI
2016–17 193 of 351 20–12 30.89 MRI
2015–16 218 of 351 16–15 11.79 MRI
2014–15 270 of 351 12–18 -6.40 MRI
2013–14 327 of 351 9–20 -48.92 MRI
2012–13 129 of 347 20–13 48.06 MRI
2011–12 119 of 345 28–9 60.98 MRI
2010–11 58 of 346 27–6 99.47 MRI
2009–10 246 of 335 14–17 1.62 MRI
2008–09 161 of 330 16–14 36.68 MRI
2007–08 150 of 328 15–15 41.10 MRI
2006–07 291 of 326 10–19 -31.87 MRI
2005–06 275 of 326 12–16 -15.06 MRI
2004–05 246 of 326 14–14 -2.39 MRI