The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Alabama State

SWAC · 10–22

Power-12.3#319 of 365
Résumé-11.29#704 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUAB (77–74)
Worst lossAir Force (64–66)
Schedule faced-8.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Florida State L 64–101 -23.8 -13.2
2 at UAB W 77–74 -19.4 +22.4
2 vs Virginia-Lynchburg non-D1 W 124–68 +28.3 +27.7
3 at Colorado L 66–94 -23.7 -4.3
3 at Air Force L 64–66 +3.2 -5.2
3 N IU Indianapolis W 101–80 +0.3 +20.7
3 N SIU Edwardsville L 68–83 -8.1 -6.9
4 at New Mexico L 87–93 -30.2 +24.2
5 at UT Martin L 64–74 -11.5 +1.5
6 at Missouri L 77–85 -27.8 +19.8
7 at Cincinnati L 51–88 -29.5 -7.5
8 at Memphis L 67–88 -19.0 -2.0
9 at Mississippi State L 56–94 -21.2 -16.8
9 at Mississippi Valley State W 89–69 +14.8 +5.2
10 at Arkansas-Pine Bluff L 79–90 +0.0 -11.0
10 vs Jackson State L 64–75 +6.2 -17.2
11 vs Alcorn State W 81–66 +8.2 +6.8
12 N Alabama A&M L 69–73 +0.3 -4.3
12 at Prairie View A&M W 95–80 -4.1 +19.1
13 at Texas Southern L 64–96 -3.4 -28.6
13 vs Bethune-Cookman L 54–69 -3.0 -12.0
14 vs Florida A&M W 79–66 +3.2 +9.8
14 at Grambling L 47–57 -5.4 -4.6
15 at Southern L 68–69 -7.5 +6.5
15 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 79–61 +5.5 +12.5
16 vs Mississippi Valley State W 92–55 +20.3 +16.7
16 at Bethune-Cookman L 71–82 -8.5 -2.5
16 at Florida A&M L 63–76 -2.2 -10.8
17 at Alabama A&M W 89–88 -2.4 +3.4
18 vs Southern L 64–71 -2.1 -4.9
18 vs Grambling L 63–65 +0.1 -2.1
19 N Alcorn State L 65–77 +5.5 -17.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #123 in 2007–08. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #240 of 326 (14-15)2005–06: #252 of 326 (12-18)2006–07: #276 of 326 (10-20)2007–08: #123 of 328 (20-11)2008–09: #147 of 330 (22-10)2009–10: #249 of 335 (16-15)2010–11: #261 of 346 (17-18)2011–12: #282 of 345 (11-19)2012–13: #314 of 347 (9-22)2013–14: #231 of 351 (19-13)2014–15: #150 of 351 (19-10)2015–16: #230 of 351 (14-17)2016–17: #332 of 351 (8-23)2017–18: #336 of 351 (8-23)2018–19: #300 of 353 (10-18)2019–20: #329 of 353 (8-24)2020–21: #341 of 347 (4-14)2021–22: #340 of 358 (9-21)2022–23: #352 of 363 (8-23)2023–24: #318 of 362 (13-19)2024–25: #283 of 364 (20-16)2025–26: #319 of 365 (10-22) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 319 of 365 10–22 -12.35 Power
2024–25 283 of 364 20–16 -7.98 Power
2023–24 318 of 362 13–19 -11.08 Power
2022–23 352 of 363 8–23 -15.93 Power
2021–22 340 of 358 9–21 -13.92 Power
2020–21 341 of 347 4–14 -18.37 Power
2019–20 329 of 353 8–24 -55.19 MRI
2018–19 300 of 353 10–18 -30.25 MRI
2017–18 336 of 351 8–23 -63.64 MRI
2016–17 332 of 351 8–23 -54.54 MRI
2015–16 230 of 351 14–17 7.60 MRI
2014–15 150 of 351 19–10 46.08 MRI
2013–14 231 of 351 19–13 12.31 MRI
2012–13 314 of 347 9–22 -47.58 MRI
2011–12 282 of 345 11–19 -17.06 MRI
2010–11 261 of 346 17–18 -7.17 MRI
2009–10 249 of 335 16–15 -0.10 MRI
2008–09 147 of 330 22–10 41.41 MRI
2007–08 123 of 328 20–11 56.61 MRI
2006–07 276 of 326 10–20 -20.40 MRI
2005–06 252 of 326 12–18 -6.31 MRI
2004–05 240 of 326 14–15 0.15 MRI