The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Gardner-Webb

Big South · 4–29

Power-21.1#362 of 365
Résumé-14.27#722 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSouth Carolina Upstate (67–65)
Worst lossNorth Greenville (81–92)
Schedule faced-3.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Minnesota L 60–87 -30.9 +3.9
1 at Clemson L 59–97 -39.7 +1.7
2 vs North Greenville non-D1 L 81–92 +19.5 -30.5
2 at Elon L 84–95 -19.1 +8.1
3 at DePaul L 62–93 -27.4 -3.6
3 at Richmond L 67–102 -23.9 -11.1
4 N Navy L 51–84 -21.5 -11.5
4 N SE Louisiana L 68–76 -11.5 +3.5
4 at UNC Wilmington L 62–88 -28.8 +2.8
5 at Queens University L 74–107 -21.9 -11.1
5 vs Georgia Southern L 84–88 -13.2 +9.2
6 vs Brevard non-D1 W 77–63 +19.5 -5.5
7 vs Wofford L 57–83 -15.8 -10.2
7 vs Toccoa Falls non-D1 W 105–65 +19.5 +20.5
7 at Tennessee L 52–94 -46.9 +4.9
9 vs Charleston Southern L 79–89 -12.5 +2.5
9 at Winthrop L 77–88 -26.8 +15.8
10 at High Point L 49–104 -34.6 -20.4
11 vs Radford L 80–89 -14.1 +5.1
11 vs Presbyterian L 55–92 -12.1 -24.9
12 at Longwood L 56–91 -19.2 -15.8
12 vs South Carolina Upstate W 67–65 -8.8 +10.8
13 at UNC Asheville L 50–69 -19.8 +0.8
14 vs Longwood L 66–86 -13.7 -6.3
14 at Presbyterian L 62–68 -17.6 +11.6
15 vs Winthrop L 85–103 -21.3 +3.3
15 vs High Point L 87–112 -29.2 +4.2
16 at Charleston Southern L 66–75 -17.9 +8.9
16 at Radford L 70–82 -19.5 +7.5
17 vs UNC Asheville L 71–77 -14.3 +8.3
17 at South Carolina Upstate L 61–71 -14.3 +4.3
18 N South Carolina Upstate W 65–64 -11.6 +12.6
18 N High Point L 59–81 -31.9 +9.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #119 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #119 of 326 (18-12)2005–06: #241 of 326 (17-12)2006–07: #299 of 326 (9-21)2007–08: #192 of 328 (16-16)2008–09: #197 of 330 (13-17)2009–10: #313 of 335 (8-21)2010–11: #276 of 346 (11-21)2011–12: #239 of 345 (12-20)2012–13: #133 of 347 (18-12)2013–14: #186 of 351 (18-15)2014–15: #206 of 351 (20-15)2015–16: #196 of 351 (17-16)2016–17: #130 of 351 (19-14)2017–18: #254 of 351 (14-18)2018–19: #167 of 353 (20-12)2019–20: #216 of 353 (14-16)2020–21: #169 of 347 (11-15)2021–22: #165 of 358 (18-13)2022–23: #167 of 363 (15-16)2023–24: #190 of 362 (17-16)2024–25: #251 of 364 (11-20)2025–26: #362 of 365 (4-29) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 362 of 365 4–29 -21.07 Power
2024–25 251 of 364 11–20 -6.03 Power
2023–24 190 of 362 17–16 -1.87 Power
2022–23 167 of 363 15–16 0.24 Power
2021–22 165 of 358 18–13 0.64 Power
2020–21 169 of 347 11–15 -0.12 Power
2019–20 216 of 353 14–16 11.48 MRI
2018–19 167 of 353 20–12 31.92 MRI
2017–18 254 of 351 14–18 0.54 MRI
2016–17 130 of 351 19–14 55.72 MRI
2015–16 196 of 351 17–16 23.78 MRI
2014–15 206 of 351 20–15 21.90 MRI
2013–14 186 of 351 18–15 31.91 MRI
2012–13 133 of 347 18–12 45.75 MRI
2011–12 239 of 345 12–20 3.78 MRI
2010–11 276 of 346 11–21 -13.62 MRI
2009–10 313 of 335 8–21 -49.65 MRI
2008–09 197 of 330 13–17 22.44 MRI
2007–08 192 of 328 16–16 20.77 MRI
2006–07 299 of 326 9–21 -36.09 MRI
2005–06 241 of 326 17–12 -0.81 MRI
2004–05 119 of 326 18–12 52.07 MRI