The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Campbell

CAA · 16–18

Power-2.6#205 of 365
Résumé-2.03#554 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUNC Wilmington (85–70)
Worst lossStony Brook (69–81)
Schedule faced-2.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Wisconsin L 64–96 -24.8 -7.2
1 at West Virginia L 65–73 -17.1 +9.1
1 vs Western Michigan W 91–82 +9.5 -0.5
2 vs Mid-Atlantic Christian non-D1 W 108–55 +38.0 +15.0
3 at Weber State L 85–91 -2.1 -3.9
3 at UT Arlington W 71–67 -4.7 +8.7
4 at Wake Forest L 51–99 -14.2 -33.8
5 at Penn State L 76–87 -7.8 -3.2
5 vs Virginia-Lynchburg non-D1 W 149–62 +38.0 +49.0
6 vs Ball State W 69–64 +9.2 -4.2
7 at Gonzaga L 70–98 -30.1 +2.1
7 at Minnesota L 50–78 -12.4 -15.6
8 vs Green Bay W 102–79 +5.4 +17.6
9 at Hofstra L 72–86 -11.7 -2.3
9 at Monmouth W 68–65 -3.3 +6.3
9 vs Northeastern W 97–82 +9.2 +5.8
10 vs Hampton W 86–72 +7.4 +6.6
10 at Elon L 82–83 -0.6 -0.4
11 at UNC Wilmington L 75–78 -10.3 +7.3
12 at Charleston L 83–87 -5.7 +1.7
12 vs Monmouth L 73–88 +2.2 -17.2
13 vs Stony Brook L 69–81 +6.9 -18.9
13 at William & Mary W 104–96 -6.2 +14.2
14 vs Drexel W 81–60 +3.6 +17.4
14 at North Carolina A&T W 79–71 +5.6 +2.4
15 vs Charleston L 57–62 -0.3 -4.7
16 vs William & Mary W 84–83 -0.8 +1.8
16 vs UNC Wilmington L 68–73 -4.9 -0.1
17 at Drexel L 60–65 -1.8 -3.2
17 at Towson L 67–71 -6.3 +2.3
18 vs North Carolina A&T W 90–72 +11.0 +7.0
18 N Stony Brook W 96–89 +4.1 +2.9
18 N UNC Wilmington W 85–70 -7.6 +22.6
19 N Monmouth L 64–74 -0.5 -9.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #112 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #314 of 326 (2-24)2005–06: #243 of 326 (10-18)2006–07: #233 of 326 (14-17)2007–08: #242 of 328 (10-20)2008–09: #209 of 330 (14-16)2009–10: #112 of 335 (19-11)2010–11: #229 of 346 (12-19)2011–12: #210 of 345 (17-15)2012–13: #289 of 347 (11-19)2013–14: #321 of 351 (12-20)2014–15: #282 of 351 (10-22)2015–16: #255 of 351 (12-18)2016–17: #222 of 351 (19-18)2017–18: #195 of 351 (18-16)2018–19: #181 of 353 (17-13)2019–20: #244 of 353 (13-16)2020–21: #188 of 347 (17-10)2021–22: #195 of 358 (16-13)2022–23: #209 of 363 (16-18)2023–24: #295 of 362 (14-18)2024–25: #224 of 364 (15-17)2025–26: #205 of 365 (16-18) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 205 of 365 16–18 -2.59 Power
2024–25 224 of 364 15–17 -3.90 Power
2023–24 295 of 362 14–18 -8.10 Power
2022–23 209 of 363 16–18 -2.49 Power
2021–22 195 of 358 16–13 -1.41 Power
2020–21 188 of 347 17–10 -1.44 Power
2019–20 244 of 353 13–16 0.52 MRI
2018–19 181 of 353 17–13 26.01 MRI
2017–18 195 of 351 18–16 26.55 MRI
2016–17 222 of 351 19–18 15.41 MRI
2015–16 255 of 351 12–18 -7.18 MRI
2014–15 282 of 351 10–22 -12.68 MRI
2013–14 321 of 351 12–20 -40.65 MRI
2012–13 289 of 347 11–19 -26.37 MRI
2011–12 210 of 345 17–15 17.45 MRI
2010–11 229 of 346 12–19 9.07 MRI
2009–10 112 of 335 19–11 63.61 MRI
2008–09 209 of 330 14–16 18.74 MRI
2007–08 242 of 328 10–20 -5.69 MRI
2006–07 233 of 326 14–17 1.35 MRI
2005–06 243 of 326 10–18 -0.83 MRI
2004–05 314 of 326 2–24 -62.10 MRI