The MRI
2025–26 · Final

VMI

SoCon · 6–26

Power-18.0#356 of 365
Résumé-14.08#721 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winChattanooga (79–71)
Worst lossThe Citadel (68–82)
Schedule faced-6.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Johnson & Wales (NC) non-D1 W 122–58 +22.6 +41.4
1 at Southern Indiana W 78–74 -5.5 +9.5
1 at Missouri L 68–106 -33.4 -4.6
2 vs Virginia-Lynchburg non-D1 W 106–54 +22.6 +29.4
2 vs Jacksonville L 67–69 -6.6 +4.6
3 at Richmond L 54–87 -20.8 -12.2
3 at Stetson L 80–99 -8.1 -10.9
4 at Buffalo L 70–78 -15.8 +7.8
4 vs Bowling Green L 48–81 -15.9 -17.1
4 at UCF L 57–82 -32.0 +7.0
5 vs Christendom non-D1 W 89–36 +22.6 +30.4
6 vs Loyola Maryland W 86–70 -3.1 +19.1
7 at Radford L 90–97 -16.4 +9.4
9 vs Samford L 58–78 -16.0 -4.0
9 vs Chattanooga W 79–71 -10.5 +18.5
10 at East Tennessee State L 67–81 -24.1 +10.1
10 at Furman L 48–69 -22.3 +1.3
11 vs Mercer L 67–77 -15.9 +5.9
11 vs The Citadel L 68–82 +0.5 -14.5
12 vs UNC Greensboro L 78–85 -7.8 +0.8
12 at Western Carolina L 58–88 -15.7 -14.3
13 at The Citadel L 56–80 -4.9 -19.1
13 at Mercer L 81–95 -21.4 +7.4
14 vs Wofford L 67–81 -12.6 -1.4
14 vs East Tennessee State L 70–87 -18.6 +1.6
15 at UNC Greensboro L 71–92 -13.2 -7.8
15 vs Furman L 72–90 -16.8 -1.2
16 at Wofford L 76–82 -18.1 +12.1
16 vs Western Carolina L 62–81 -10.3 -8.7
17 at Samford L 61–80 -21.5 +2.5
17 at Chattanooga L 79–86 -15.9 +8.9
18 N UNC Greensboro L 70–84 -10.5 -3.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #122 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #299 of 326 (9-18)2005–06: #294 of 326 (7-20)2006–07: #206 of 326 (14-19)2007–08: #198 of 328 (14-15)2008–09: #122 of 330 (24-8)2009–10: #315 of 335 (10-19)2010–11: #183 of 346 (18-13)2011–12: #266 of 345 (16-16)2012–13: #300 of 347 (11-17)2013–14: #162 of 351 (22-13)2014–15: #291 of 351 (11-19)2015–16: #321 of 351 (9-21)2016–17: #330 of 351 (6-24)2017–18: #325 of 351 (9-21)2018–19: #328 of 353 (8-21)2019–20: #282 of 353 (6-24)2020–21: #133 of 347 (13-12)2021–22: #145 of 358 (16-16)2022–23: #324 of 363 (7-25)2023–24: #357 of 362 (4-28)2024–25: #306 of 364 (15-19)2025–26: #356 of 365 (6-26) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 356 of 365 6–26 -17.96 Power
2024–25 306 of 364 15–19 -9.78 Power
2023–24 357 of 362 4–28 -18.23 Power
2022–23 324 of 363 7–25 -10.90 Power
2021–22 145 of 358 16–16 2.03 Power
2020–21 133 of 347 13–12 2.35 Power
2019–20 282 of 353 6–24 -17.14 MRI
2018–19 328 of 353 8–21 -52.78 MRI
2017–18 325 of 351 9–21 -45.17 MRI
2016–17 330 of 351 6–24 -52.01 MRI
2015–16 321 of 351 9–21 -39.39 MRI
2014–15 291 of 351 11–19 -19.18 MRI
2013–14 162 of 351 22–13 40.56 MRI
2012–13 300 of 347 11–17 -32.54 MRI
2011–12 266 of 345 16–16 -10.01 MRI
2010–11 183 of 346 18–13 31.98 MRI
2009–10 315 of 335 10–19 -54.20 MRI
2008–09 122 of 330 24–8 55.92 MRI
2007–08 198 of 328 14–15 18.59 MRI
2006–07 206 of 326 14–19 13.89 MRI
2005–06 294 of 326 7–20 -32.13 MRI
2004–05 299 of 326 9–18 -36.76 MRI