The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Kansas State

Big 12 · 12–20

Power+4.9#106 of 365
Résumé+3.08#113 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBaylor (90–74)
Worst lossBowling Green (66–82)
Schedule faced+9.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UNC Greensboro W 93–64 +15.2 +13.8
1 vs Bellarmine W 98–71 +17.1 +9.9
2 vs California W 99–96 +0.6 +2.4
3 vs Tulsa W 84–83 -1.9 +2.9
3 N Mississippi State W 98–77 -1.2 +22.2
3 N Nebraska L 85–86 -16.0 +15.0
4 at Indiana L 69–86 -12.0 -5.0
5 vs Bowling Green L 66–82 +7.0 -23.0
5 vs Seton Hall L 67–78 -2.6 -8.4
6 vs Mississippi Valley State W 108–49 +37.5 +21.5
6 at Creighton W 83–76 -7.1 +14.1
7 vs South Dakota W 106–76 +15.9 +14.1
8 vs UL Monroe W 94–85 +26.5 -17.5
9 vs BYU L 73–83 -11.5 +1.5
10 at Arizona L 76–101 -29.2 +4.2
10 at Arizona State L 84–87 -6.1 +3.1
11 vs UCF L 73–82 -3.6 -5.4
11 at Oklahoma State L 83–84 -5.6 +4.6
12 vs Utah W 81–78 +4.8 -1.8
12 vs Kansas L 62–86 -12.6 -11.4
13 at West Virginia L 54–59 -9.6 +4.6
13 vs Iowa State L 61–95 -19.0 -15.0
14 at TCU L 82–84 -10.7 +8.7
15 vs Cincinnati L 62–91 -6.7 -22.3
15 at Houston L 64–78 -25.9 +11.9
16 vs Baylor W 90–74 -5.8 +21.8
16 at Texas Tech L 72–100 -19.3 -8.7
17 at Colorado L 70–79 -6.4 -2.6
17 vs TCU L 68–77 -5.3 -3.7
18 vs West Virginia W 65–63 -4.1 +6.1
18 at Kansas L 85–104 -18.1 -0.9
19 N BYU L 91–105 -14.3 +0.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #100 of 326 (16-12)2005–06: #82 of 326 (15-13)2006–07: #58 of 326 (23-12)2007–08: #20 of 328 (21-12)2008–09: #33 of 330 (22-12)2009–10: #5 of 335 (29-8)2010–11: #25 of 346 (23-11)2011–12: #37 of 345 (22-11)2012–13: #31 of 347 (26-7)2013–14: #70 of 351 (20-13)2014–15: #159 of 351 (15-17)2015–16: #82 of 351 (17-16)2016–17: #79 of 351 (20-14)2017–18: #79 of 351 (25-12)2018–19: #31 of 353 (25-9)2019–20: #162 of 353 (11-21)2020–21: #231 of 347 (9-20)2021–22: #97 of 358 (14-17)2022–23: #26 of 363 (26-10)2023–24: #62 of 362 (19-15)2024–25: #73 of 364 (16-17)2025–26: #106 of 365 (12-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 106 of 365 12–20 4.94 Power
2024–25 73 of 364 16–17 8.84 Power
2023–24 62 of 362 19–15 9.78 Power
2022–23 26 of 363 26–10 13.61 Power
2021–22 97 of 358 14–17 5.92 Power
2020–21 231 of 347 9–20 -4.60 Power
2019–20 162 of 353 11–21 37.18 MRI
2018–19 31 of 353 25–9 121.70 MRI
2017–18 79 of 351 25–12 85.85 MRI
2016–17 79 of 351 20–14 82.33 MRI
2015–16 82 of 351 17–16 81.60 MRI
2014–15 159 of 351 15–17 39.18 MRI
2013–14 70 of 351 20–13 86.12 MRI
2012–13 31 of 347 26–7 122.42 MRI
2011–12 37 of 345 22–11 113.20 MRI
2010–11 25 of 346 23–11 132.99 MRI
2009–10 5 of 335 29–8 185.74 MRI
2008–09 33 of 330 22–12 119.93 MRI
2007–08 20 of 328 21–12 140.79 MRI
2006–07 58 of 326 23–12 99.17 MRI
2005–06 82 of 326 15–13 77.79 MRI
2004–05 100 of 326 16–12 60.80 MRI