The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Wichita State

American · 24–12

Power+8.6#79 of 365
Résumé+7.41#69 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSouth Florida (86–85)
Worst lossRice (64–66)
Schedule faced+1.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UNC Asheville W 75–58 +15.4 +1.6
1 vs Prairie View A&M W 105–62 +22.3 +20.7
2 vs Loyola Chicago W 95–74 +19.0 +2.0
3 at Boise State L 59–62 -5.1 +2.1
3 vs Milwaukee W 75–58 +16.8 +0.2
4 N Saint Mary's L 65–70 -10.2 +5.2
4 N Colorado State L 70–76 -0.1 -5.9
4 N Western Kentucky L 70–75 +7.6 -12.6
5 vs Mount Marty College non-D1 W 95–69 +49.2 -23.2
5 at Northern Iowa W 74–69 -3.6 +8.6
6 vs DePaul L 58–61 +7.7 -10.7
7 vs Wofford W 84–73 +13.9 -2.9
7 vs Eastern Kentucky W 88–57 +18.9 +12.1
9 at UAB W 75–70 +1.5 +3.5
9 at Charlotte L 100–104 +8.7 -12.7
10 vs Rice L 64–66 +16.5 -18.5
10 vs North Texas W 78–67 +8.1 +2.9
11 at Florida Atlantic L 67–85 +1.7 -19.7
11 at South Florida W 86–85 -6.7 +7.7
12 vs East Carolina W 77–60 +18.7 -1.7
12 vs Memphis W 74–59 +7.4 +7.6
13 at Tulsa L 83–93 -3.7 -6.3
14 vs Charlotte W 74–64 +14.2 -4.2
14 at Tulane W 75–61 +9.6 +4.4
15 vs South Florida L 58–66 -1.3 -6.8
15 vs Tulsa W 81–77 +1.8 +2.2
16 at East Carolina W 92–89 +13.3 -10.3
16 vs Temple W 69–57 +11.2 +0.8
17 at Memphis W 88–82 +1.9 +4.1
18 at UTSA W 84–67 +20.5 -3.5
18 vs Florida Atlantic W 88–70 +7.1 +10.9
19 N Tulsa W 81–68 -1.0 +14.0
19 N South Florida L 55–70 -4.0 -11.0
20 vs Wyoming W 74–70 +6.8 -2.8
21 at Oklahoma State W 96–70 -2.0 +28.0
21 at Tulsa L 79–83 -3.7 -0.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #49 of 326 (22-10)2005–06: #26 of 326 (26-9)2006–07: #96 of 326 (17-14)2007–08: #165 of 328 (11-20)2008–09: #124 of 330 (17-17)2009–10: #51 of 335 (25-10)2010–11: #11 of 346 (29-8)2011–12: #10 of 345 (27-6)2012–13: #21 of 347 (26-8)2013–14: #3 of 351 (35-1)2014–15: #9 of 351 (30-5)2015–16: #8 of 351 (26-9)2016–17: #3 of 351 (31-5)2017–18: #19 of 351 (23-8)2018–19: #79 of 353 (22-15)2019–20: #16 of 353 (23-8)2020–21: #77 of 347 (16-6)2021–22: #91 of 358 (15-13)2022–23: #106 of 363 (17-15)2023–24: #149 of 362 (15-19)2024–25: #143 of 364 (19-15)2025–26: #79 of 365 (24-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 79 of 365 24–12 8.57 Power
2024–25 143 of 364 19–15 1.57 Power
2023–24 149 of 362 15–19 1.61 Power
2022–23 106 of 363 17–15 4.94 Power
2021–22 91 of 358 15–13 6.24 Power
2020–21 77 of 347 16–6 7.52 Power
2019–20 16 of 353 23–8 124.58 MRI
2018–19 79 of 353 22–15 72.56 MRI
2017–18 19 of 351 23–8 147.92 MRI
2016–17 3 of 351 31–5 219.46 MRI
2015–16 8 of 351 26–9 181.25 MRI
2014–15 9 of 351 30–5 172.99 MRI
2013–14 3 of 351 35–1 221.40 MRI
2012–13 21 of 347 26–8 137.62 MRI
2011–12 10 of 345 27–6 162.74 MRI
2010–11 11 of 346 29–8 164.62 MRI
2009–10 51 of 335 25–10 109.28 MRI
2008–09 124 of 330 17–17 54.63 MRI
2007–08 165 of 328 11–20 34.37 MRI
2006–07 96 of 326 17–14 69.94 MRI
2005–06 26 of 326 26–9 117.94 MRI
2004–05 49 of 326 22–10 98.35 MRI