MRI Champion · 2 basketball titles 2005–06, 2007–08

Memphis

American · 13–19

Power+3.9#119 of 365

Résumé+0.57#154 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winBaylor (78–71)
Worst lossEast Carolina (68–84)
Schedule faced+4.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	San Francisco	W 76–70	+2.6	+3.4
2	at	Ole Miss	L 77–83	-8.5	+2.5
2	vs	UNLV	L 78–92	+2.1	-16.1
3	N	Purdue	L 71–80	-21.6	+12.6
3	N	Wake Forest	L 68–69	-4.9	+3.9
4	vs	Southern Illinois	W 74–58	+3.4	+12.6
5	vs	New Orleans	W 86–70	+13.4	+2.6
5	vs	Baylor	W 78–71	-6.8	+13.8
6	at	Louisville	L 73–99	-18.7	-7.3
7	vs	Vanderbilt	L 70–77	-14.9	+7.9
7	at	Mississippi State	L 66–71	-5.0	-0.0
8	vs	Alabama State	W 88–67	+19.0	+2.0
9	vs	North Texas	W 57–48	+3.4	+5.6
9	at	Rice	W 76–70	+6.4	-0.4
10	at	Florida Atlantic	L 78–89	-3.0	-8.1
11	vs	Temple	W 55–53	+6.6	-4.6
11	vs	UTSA	W 95–69	+21.4	+4.6
12	at	Tulsa	L 66–83	-8.3	-8.7
12	at	Wichita State	L 59–74	-7.4	-7.6
13	vs	Florida Atlantic	W 92–65	+2.5	+24.5
13	vs	Tulane	L 76–78	+10.4	-12.4
14	at	UAB	W 90–80	-3.1	+13.1
14	vs	Charlotte	W 77–54	+9.6	+13.4
15	at	North Texas	L 69–76	-2.0	-5.0
15	at	Utah State	L 75–99	-16.8	-7.2
16	at	South Florida	L 66–87	-11.3	-9.7
16	vs	UAB	L 67–78	+2.3	-13.3
17	vs	Wichita State	L 82–88	-1.9	-4.1
17	at	East Carolina	L 68–84	+8.6	-24.6
18	vs	South Florida	L 89–96	-5.9	-1.1
18	at	Tulane	W 96–95	+4.9	-3.9
19	N	Tulane	L 69–81	+7.7	-19.6

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #1 in 2007–08. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	119 of 365	13–19	3.94	Power
2024–25	42 of 364	29–6	13.43	Power
2023–24	59 of 362	22–10	10.37	Power
2022–23	18 of 363	26–9	15.21	Power
2021–22	24 of 358	22–11	14.30	Power
2020–21	24 of 347	20–8	13.20	Power
2019–20	60 of 353	21–10	86.18	MRI
2018–19	52 of 353	22–14	95.59	MRI
2017–18	169 of 351	21–13	40.38	MRI
2016–17	96 of 351	19–13	69.54	MRI
2015–16	71 of 351	19–15	92.21	MRI
2014–15	66 of 351	18–14	87.13	MRI
2013–14	44 of 351	24–10	111.38	MRI
2012–13	13 of 347	30–4	155.10	MRI
2011–12	7 of 345	26–9	171.97	MRI
2010–11	92 of 346	25–10	74.30	MRI
2009–10	37 of 335	24–10	126.97	MRI
2008–09	2 of 330	33–4	230.59	MRI
2007–08	1 of 328	38–2	280.65	MRI
2006–07	3 of 326	33–4	225.58	MRI
2005–06	1 of 326	33–4	219.16	MRI
2004–05	47 of 326	22–16	100.60	MRI