The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Baylor

Big 12 · 17–17

Power+13.5#48 of 365
Résumé+7.32#70 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSan Diego State (91–81)
Worst lossMemphis (71–78)
Schedule faced+9.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UT Rio Grande Valley W 96–81 +16.1 -1.1
2 vs Washington W 78–69 +5.4 +3.6
2 vs Tarleton State W 94–81 +21.2 -8.2
4 N Creighton W 81–74 +4.1 +2.9
4 N St. John's L 81–96 -10.0 -5.0
4 N San Diego State W 91–81 -0.3 +10.3
5 vs Sacramento State W 110–88 +26.5 -4.5
5 at Memphis L 71–78 +6.8 -13.8
6 vs Norfolk State W 97–67 +24.0 +6.0
7 vs Alcorn State W 113–56 +34.0 +23.0
7 vs Southern W 111–67 +23.7 +20.3
9 vs Arlington Baptist non-D1 W 124–61 +54.1 +8.9
9 at TCU L 63–69 -2.2 -3.8
10 vs Iowa State L 60–70 -10.5 +0.5
10 vs Houston L 55–77 -11.9 -10.1
11 at Oklahoma State W 94–79 +2.9 +12.1
11 at Kansas L 62–80 -9.5 -8.5
12 vs Texas Tech L 73–92 -5.3 -13.7
12 vs TCU L 90–97 +3.2 -10.2
13 at Cincinnati L 57–67 -3.7 -6.3
13 at West Virginia W 63–53 -1.1 +11.1
14 vs Colorado W 86–67 +7.6 +11.4
14 at Iowa State L 69–72 -15.9 +12.9
15 vs BYU L 94–99 -3.0 -2.0
15 N Louisville L 71–82 -6.4 -4.6
16 at Kansas State L 74–90 +5.8 -21.8
16 vs Arizona State W 73–68 +7.8 -2.8
17 vs Arizona L 80–87 -15.2 +8.2
17 at UCF W 87–86 -0.6 +1.6
18 at Houston L 64–77 -17.4 +4.4
18 vs Utah W 101–75 +13.3 +12.7
19 N Arizona State L 79–83 +5.1 -9.1
22 N Minnesota W 67–48 +6.4 +12.6
22 N Oklahoma L 69–82 -0.4 -12.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #287 of 326 (9-19)2005–06: #274 of 326 (4-13)2006–07: #126 of 326 (15-16)2007–08: #69 of 328 (21-11)2008–09: #54 of 330 (24-15)2009–10: #8 of 335 (28-8)2010–11: #80 of 346 (18-13)2011–12: #17 of 345 (30-8)2012–13: #45 of 347 (17-14)2013–14: #27 of 351 (26-12)2014–15: #12 of 351 (24-10)2015–16: #32 of 351 (22-12)2016–17: #22 of 351 (27-8)2017–18: #50 of 351 (18-15)2018–19: #43 of 353 (20-14)2019–20: #10 of 353 (26-4)2020–21: #2 of 347 (28-2)2021–22: #4 of 358 (27-7)2022–23: #11 of 363 (23-11)2023–24: #15 of 362 (24-11)2024–25: #24 of 364 (20-15)2025–26: #48 of 365 (17-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 48 of 365 17–17 13.46 Power
2024–25 24 of 364 20–15 17.17 Power
2023–24 15 of 362 24–11 17.85 Power
2022–23 11 of 363 23–11 17.09 Power
2021–22 4 of 358 27–7 22.17 Power
2020–21 2 of 347 28–2 24.45 Power
2019–20 10 of 353 26–4 140.57 MRI
2018–19 43 of 353 20–14 101.70 MRI
2017–18 50 of 351 18–15 106.55 MRI
2016–17 22 of 351 27–8 147.99 MRI
2015–16 32 of 351 22–12 126.23 MRI
2014–15 12 of 351 24–10 153.03 MRI
2013–14 27 of 351 26–12 135.94 MRI
2012–13 45 of 347 17–14 103.16 MRI
2011–12 17 of 345 30–8 149.77 MRI
2010–11 80 of 346 18–13 79.61 MRI
2009–10 8 of 335 28–8 163.89 MRI
2008–09 54 of 330 24–15 100.68 MRI
2007–08 69 of 328 21–11 88.18 MRI
2006–07 126 of 326 15–16 51.51 MRI
2005–06 274 of 326 4–13 -14.70 MRI
2004–05 287 of 326 9–19 -23.87 MRI