The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Iowa State

Big 12 · 29–8

Power+26.7#6 of 365
Résumé+18.13#15 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHouston (70–67)
Worst lossTCU (55–62)
Schedule faced+9.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Fairleigh Dickinson W 88–50 +42.7 -4.7
1 vs Grambling W 102–62 +39.1 +0.9
2 N Mississippi State W 96–80 +20.5 -4.5
3 vs Stonehill W 96–57 +42.7 -3.7
4 N St. John's W 83–82 +3.2 -2.2
4 N Creighton W 78–60 +17.3 +0.7
4 N Syracuse W 95–64 +20.6 +10.4
5 vs Alcorn State W 132–68 +47.2 +16.8
5 at Purdue W 81–58 -1.6 +24.6
6 vs Iowa W 66–62 +11.6 -7.6
6 vs Eastern Illinois W 78–53 +40.9 -15.9
7 vs Long Beach State W 91–60 +37.7 -6.7
9 vs Houston Christian W 89–61 +41.7 -13.7
9 vs West Virginia W 80–59 +17.6 +3.4
10 at Baylor W 70–60 +10.5 -0.5
10 vs Oklahoma State W 83–71 +21.6 -9.6
11 at Kansas L 63–84 +3.7 -24.7
11 at Cincinnati L 70–79 +9.5 -18.5
12 vs UCF W 87–57 +18.1 +11.9
12 at Oklahoma State W 84–71 +16.1 -3.1
13 vs Colorado W 97–67 +20.8 +9.2
13 at Kansas State W 95–61 +19.0 +15.0
14 vs Baylor W 72–69 +15.9 -12.9
15 at TCU L 55–62 +11.0 -18.0
15 vs Kansas W 74–56 +9.1 +8.9
16 vs Houston W 70–67 +1.2 +1.8
16 at BYU L 69–79 +4.7 -14.7
17 at Utah W 75–59 +21.0 -5.0
17 vs Texas Tech L 73–82 +7.9 -16.9
18 at Arizona L 57–73 -7.4 -8.6
18 vs Arizona State W 86–65 +21.0 -0.0
19 N Arizona State W 91–42 +18.3 +30.7
19 N Texas Tech W 75–53 +5.1 +16.9
19 N Arizona L 80–82 -4.7 +2.7
20 N Tennessee State W 108–74 +27.7 +6.3
20 N Kentucky W 82–63 +8.5 +10.5
21 N Tennessee L 62–76 +3.6 -17.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #63 of 326 (19-12)2005–06: #99 of 326 (16-14)2006–07: #162 of 326 (15-16)2007–08: #196 of 328 (14-18)2008–09: #172 of 330 (15-17)2009–10: #123 of 335 (15-17)2010–11: #121 of 346 (16-16)2011–12: #54 of 345 (21-11)2012–13: #37 of 347 (22-11)2013–14: #29 of 351 (28-8)2014–15: #30 of 351 (25-9)2015–16: #39 of 351 (23-12)2016–17: #42 of 351 (24-11)2017–18: #193 of 351 (12-18)2018–19: #24 of 353 (23-12)2019–20: #152 of 353 (12-20)2020–21: #236 of 347 (2-22)2021–22: #84 of 358 (22-13)2022–23: #38 of 363 (19-14)2023–24: #8 of 362 (29-8)2024–25: #8 of 364 (25-10)2025–26: #6 of 365 (29-8) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 6 of 365 29–8 26.66 Power
2024–25 8 of 364 25–10 22.41 Power
2023–24 8 of 362 29–8 20.27 Power
2022–23 38 of 363 19–14 12.54 Power
2021–22 84 of 358 22–13 7.57 Power
2020–21 236 of 347 2–22 -4.81 Power
2019–20 152 of 353 12–20 41.75 MRI
2018–19 24 of 353 23–12 131.24 MRI
2017–18 193 of 351 12–18 26.71 MRI
2016–17 42 of 351 24–11 112.37 MRI
2015–16 39 of 351 23–12 114.88 MRI
2014–15 30 of 351 25–9 127.62 MRI
2013–14 29 of 351 28–8 134.07 MRI
2012–13 37 of 347 22–11 117.65 MRI
2011–12 54 of 345 21–11 99.22 MRI
2010–11 121 of 346 16–16 59.11 MRI
2009–10 123 of 335 15–17 55.88 MRI
2008–09 172 of 330 15–17 31.62 MRI
2007–08 196 of 328 14–18 20.03 MRI
2006–07 162 of 326 15–16 32.67 MRI
2005–06 99 of 326 16–14 64.02 MRI
2004–05 63 of 326 19–12 85.21 MRI