The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Northwestern State

Southland · 10–22

Power-10.6#304 of 365
Résumé-9.17#684 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUT Rio Grande Valley (64–63)
Worst lossNorth Alabama (83–87)
Schedule faced-4.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-12.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Texas A&M L 68–98 -28.9 -1.1
1 at North Texas L 53–80 -16.6 -10.4
2 at North Alabama L 83–87 -0.5 -3.5
2 vs Ecclesia non-D1 W 95–75 +30.0 -10.0
3 at San Francisco L 64–84 -17.4 -2.6
3 at Grand Canyon L 72–85 -23.8 +10.8
4 vs Southern L 73–75 -0.3 -1.7
5 at McNeese L 54–92 -23.2 -14.8
5 at SE Louisiana W 76–68 -3.7 +11.8
6 at California L 70–79 -20.4 +11.4
7 vs Southern-New Orleans non-D1 W 108–55 +30.0 +23.0
9 vs Lamar L 61–76 -2.6 -12.4
9 vs Stephen F. Austin L 64–74 -12.3 +2.3
9 vs New Orleans W 74–68 -1.1 +7.1
10 at Nicholls L 72–74 -6.6 +4.6
10 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 79–78 -6.0 +7.0
11 vs UT Rio Grande Valley W 64–63 -7.9 +8.9
11 at Incarnate Word L 74–76 -5.8 +3.8
12 at Houston Christian L 80–82 -1.0 -1.0
13 at Stephen F. Austin L 67–69 -17.8 +15.8
13 at New Orleans L 64–75 -6.6 -4.4
14 vs Nicholls L 58–61 -1.2 -1.8
14 vs East Texas A&M L 68–74 +4.7 -10.7
14 at East Texas A&M L 48–52 -0.8 -3.2
15 at Lamar W 70–68 -8.1 +10.1
15 vs SE Louisiana W 69–66 +1.7 +1.3
16 vs McNeese L 64–75 -17.8 +6.8
16 vs Houston Christian W 71–53 +4.4 +13.6
17 vs Incarnate Word W 54–49 -0.4 +5.3
17 at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 59–71 -11.4 -0.6
18 at UT Rio Grande Valley L 62–74 -13.4 +1.4
19 N Nicholls L 47–61 -3.9 -10.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 vs East Texas A&M +4.7 66%

Season by season

Best finish: #70 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #86 of 326 (20-12)2005–06: #70 of 326 (26-8)2006–07: #137 of 326 (17-15)2007–08: #263 of 328 (15-18)2008–09: #308 of 330 (11-20)2009–10: #296 of 335 (10-19)2010–11: #239 of 346 (18-14)2011–12: #212 of 345 (16-16)2012–13: #116 of 347 (19-8)2013–14: #150 of 351 (17-14)2014–15: #188 of 351 (19-13)2015–16: #325 of 351 (8-20)2016–17: #281 of 351 (13-16)2017–18: #342 of 351 (4-25)2018–19: #339 of 353 (8-20)2019–20: #265 of 353 (12-15)2020–21: #292 of 347 (11-18)2021–22: #324 of 358 (9-23)2022–23: #227 of 363 (22-11)2023–24: #325 of 362 (9-23)2024–25: #280 of 364 (16-16)2025–26: #304 of 365 (10-22) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 304 of 365 10–22 -10.58 Power
2024–25 280 of 364 16–16 -7.82 Power
2023–24 325 of 362 9–23 -11.40 Power
2022–23 227 of 363 22–11 -3.90 Power
2021–22 324 of 358 9–23 -11.58 Power
2020–21 292 of 347 11–18 -8.57 Power
2019–20 265 of 353 12–15 -7.61 MRI
2018–19 339 of 353 8–20 -76.18 MRI
2017–18 342 of 351 4–25 -72.97 MRI
2016–17 281 of 351 13–16 -12.32 MRI
2015–16 325 of 351 8–20 -46.01 MRI
2014–15 188 of 351 19–13 28.06 MRI
2013–14 150 of 351 17–14 44.94 MRI
2012–13 116 of 347 19–8 53.25 MRI
2011–12 212 of 345 16–16 16.45 MRI
2010–11 239 of 346 18–14 3.33 MRI
2009–10 296 of 335 10–19 -29.26 MRI
2008–09 308 of 330 11–20 -47.02 MRI
2007–08 263 of 328 15–18 -14.05 MRI
2006–07 137 of 326 17–15 44.62 MRI
2005–06 70 of 326 26–8 86.52 MRI
2004–05 86 of 326 20–12 70.58 MRI