Mississippi State

SEC · 13–19

Power+6.2#95 of 365

Résumé+4.66#98 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winAuburn (91–85)
Worst lossSan Francisco (62–65)
Schedule faced+10.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	North Alabama	W 86–62	+21.7	+2.3
2	N	Iowa State	L 80–96	-20.5	+4.5
2	vs	SE Louisiana	W 75–68	+18.4	-11.4
3	N	Kansas State	L 77–98	+1.2	-22.2
3	N	New Mexico	L 78–80	-8.9	+6.9
4	vs	New Orleans	W 81–78	+15.6	-12.6
4	vs	SMU	L 81–87	-5.1	-0.9
5	at	Georgia Tech	W 85–73	+4.6	+7.4
5	N	San Francisco	L 62–65	+2.1	-5.1
6	N	Utah	W 82–74	+3.2	+4.8
7	vs	Long Island University	W 87–83	+13.0	-9.0
7	vs	Memphis	W 71–66	+5.0	+0.0
9	vs	Alabama State	W 94–56	+21.2	+16.8
9	at	Texas	W 101–98	-12.3	+15.3
10	vs	Oklahoma	W 72–53	-5.0	+24.0
10	at	Kentucky	L 68–92	-14.7	-9.3
11	vs	Alabama	L 82–97	-15.6	+0.6
11	vs	Ole Miss	L 67–68	-0.9	-0.1
12	at	Texas A&M	L 68–88	-12.2	-7.8
12	vs	Vanderbilt	L 56–88	-12.7	-19.3
13	at	LSU	W 80–66	-6.1	+20.1
13	at	Missouri	L 79–84	-9.3	+4.3
14	vs	Arkansas	L 68–88	-12.1	-7.9
15	vs	Tennessee	L 64–73	-14.2	+5.2
15	at	Ole Miss	W 90–78	-6.3	+18.3
16	vs	Auburn	W 91–85	-9.6	+15.6
16	at	South Carolina	L 89–97	-2.0	-6.0
17	at	Alabama	L 75–100	-21.0	-4.0
17	vs	Missouri	L 64–88	-3.8	-20.2
18	at	Florida	L 74–108	-25.7	-8.3
18	vs	Georgia	L 96–102	-7.6	+1.6
19	N	Auburn	L 61–79	-12.4	-5.6

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #19 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	95 of 365	13–19	6.16	Power
2024–25	34 of 364	21–13	15.12	Power
2023–24	35 of 362	21–14	13.34	Power
2022–23	53 of 363	21–13	10.75	Power
2021–22	52 of 358	18–16	10.45	Power
2020–21	90 of 347	18–15	6.94	Power
2019–20	46 of 353	20–11	94.68	MRI
2018–19	26 of 353	23–11	126.32	MRI
2017–18	65 of 351	25–12	93.61	MRI
2016–17	145 of 351	16–16	47.06	MRI
2015–16	151 of 351	14–17	51.24	MRI
2014–15	223 of 351	13–19	15.14	MRI
2013–14	258 of 351	14–19	0.51	MRI
2012–13	292 of 347	10–22	-27.03	MRI
2011–12	89 of 345	21–12	75.83	MRI
2010–11	170 of 346	17–14	34.57	MRI
2009–10	60 of 335	24–12	101.43	MRI
2008–09	75 of 330	23–13	85.20	MRI
2007–08	42 of 328	23–11	110.69	MRI
2006–07	19 of 326	21–14	136.16	MRI
2005–06	117 of 326	15–15	54.98	MRI
2004–05	22 of 326	23–11	131.52	MRI