The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Murray State

MVC · 20–13

Power+3.5#124 of 365
Résumé+5.00#95 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winAkron (115–100)
Worst lossDrake (90–101)
Schedule faced+1.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Omaha W 85–77 +9.0 -1.0
1 vs Mississippi Valley State W 108–60 +36.1 +11.9
2 at SMU L 91–102 -13.2 +2.2
2 vs Nicholls W 99–79 +12.9 +7.1
3 vs Little Rock W 89–68 +15.7 +5.3
4 N Middle Tennessee L 87–90 +2.5 -5.5
4 N McNeese L 60–73 -6.4 -6.6
4 N George Washington W 96–95 -4.2 +5.2
5 vs Morehead State W 84–52 +14.7 +17.3
5 vs Bellarmine W 81–68 +15.6 -2.6
6 N Akron W 115–100 -8.3 +23.3
7 vs Drake W 81–72 +5.6 +3.4
7 at Valparaiso W 85–79 +1.4 +4.6
9 vs Southern Illinois W 84–81 +2.9 +0.1
9 at UIC W 81–77 -3.2 +7.2
9 vs Bradley W 86–66 +1.3 +18.7
10 at Evansville W 79–69 +11.0 -1.0
10 vs Valparaiso W 92–79 +6.8 +6.2
11 vs Indiana State W 85–81 +8.2 -4.2
12 at Drake L 90–101 +0.2 -11.2
12 at Northern Iowa L 76–81 -8.6 +3.6
13 vs Illinois State L 65–70 -0.5 -4.5
13 at Belmont L 86–103 -9.6 -7.4
14 vs UIC W 81–74 +2.2 +4.8
14 at Southern Illinois W 91–81 -2.5 +12.5
15 vs Northern Iowa L 60–89 -3.2 -25.8
15 at Indiana State W 74–72 +2.8 -0.8
15 vs Belmont L 70–87 -4.1 -12.9
16 at Illinois State L 61–78 -6.0 -11.0
16 vs Evansville W 88–75 +16.5 -3.5
17 at Bradley L 78–87 -4.2 -4.8
18 N UIC L 79–92 -0.5 -12.5
20 at Nevada L 75–89 -8.9 -5.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #15 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #80 of 326 (17-11)2005–06: #37 of 326 (24-7)2006–07: #188 of 326 (16-14)2007–08: #133 of 328 (18-13)2008–09: #100 of 330 (19-12)2009–10: #15 of 335 (31-5)2010–11: #79 of 346 (23-9)2011–12: #22 of 345 (31-2)2012–13: #96 of 347 (19-10)2013–14: #88 of 351 (23-11)2014–15: #31 of 351 (29-6)2015–16: #155 of 351 (17-14)2016–17: #188 of 351 (16-17)2017–18: #32 of 351 (26-6)2018–19: #25 of 353 (26-5)2019–20: #86 of 353 (21-9)2020–21: #121 of 347 (13-13)2021–22: #33 of 358 (31-3)2022–23: #163 of 363 (17-15)2023–24: #172 of 362 (12-20)2024–25: #138 of 364 (16-17)2025–26: #124 of 365 (20-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 124 of 365 20–13 3.49 Power
2024–25 138 of 364 16–17 2.02 Power
2023–24 172 of 362 12–20 -0.40 Power
2022–23 163 of 363 17–15 0.49 Power
2021–22 33 of 358 31–3 12.20 Power
2020–21 121 of 347 13–13 3.74 Power
2019–20 86 of 353 21–9 75.99 MRI
2018–19 25 of 353 26–5 127.80 MRI
2017–18 32 of 351 26–6 125.57 MRI
2016–17 188 of 351 16–17 33.37 MRI
2015–16 155 of 351 17–14 49.28 MRI
2014–15 31 of 351 29–6 127.04 MRI
2013–14 88 of 351 23–11 75.87 MRI
2012–13 96 of 347 19–10 61.11 MRI
2011–12 22 of 345 31–2 139.28 MRI
2010–11 79 of 346 23–9 79.64 MRI
2009–10 15 of 335 31–5 149.72 MRI
2008–09 100 of 330 19–12 66.52 MRI
2007–08 133 of 328 18–13 51.11 MRI
2006–07 188 of 326 16–14 22.09 MRI
2005–06 37 of 326 24–7 107.94 MRI
2004–05 80 of 326 17–11 73.92 MRI