The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UT Arlington

UAC · 18–14

Power-0.6#173 of 365
Résumé+0.04#167 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winStephen F. Austin (66–61)
Worst lossSouthern Utah (73–78)
Schedule faced-3.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UNT Dallas non-D1 W 91–40 +40.0 +11.0
1 at New Mexico L 56–74 -18.4 +0.4
2 vs Arlington Baptist non-D1 W 117–61 +40.0 +16.0
2 vs Missouri State W 67–49 +4.9 +13.1
3 at Evansville W 84–76 +6.9 +1.1
3 vs Campbell L 67–71 +4.7 -8.7
3 at Weber State W 74–73 -0.1 +1.1
4 vs Stephen F. Austin W 66–61 -2.3 +7.3
5 at Arkansas State L 63–83 -7.2 -12.8
6 at UT Rio Grande Valley W 58–50 -3.4 +11.4
7 at Stanford L 60–76 -12.4 -3.6
8 at Oral Roberts W 69–57 +7.9 +4.1
9 vs Tarleton State L 63–69 +7.1 -13.1
9 vs California Baptist W 63–51 -1.6 +13.6
9 at Southern Utah W 86–77 +5.1 +3.9
10 vs Abilene Christian W 82–72 +8.5 +1.5
11 at Utah Tech W 56–52 +0.8 +3.2
11 at Utah Valley L 74–86 -10.7 -1.3
12 vs Tarleton State W 71–64 +7.1 -0.1
13 vs Southern Utah W 80–61 +10.5 +8.5
13 vs California Baptist L 77–87 -1.6 -8.4
14 at Utah Tech L 84–87 +0.8 -3.8
14 at Utah Valley L 60–81 -10.7 -10.3
15 at Abilene Christian L 63–67 +3.0 -7.0
15 vs Southern Utah L 73–78 +10.5 -15.5
16 vs Utah Tech W 63–50 +6.2 +6.8
16 vs Utah Valley L 54–66 -5.2 -6.8
17 at California Baptist L 56–68 -7.1 -4.9
18 at Tarleton State W 65–60 +1.7 +3.3
18 at Abilene Christian W 64–57 +3.0 +4.0
19 N Southern Utah W 69–63 +7.8 -1.8
19 N Utah Valley L 65–67 -7.9 +5.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #35 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #252 of 326 (12-15)2005–06: #180 of 326 (14-16)2006–07: #242 of 326 (13-17)2007–08: #125 of 328 (21-12)2008–09: #132 of 330 (16-14)2009–10: #194 of 335 (16-14)2010–11: #230 of 346 (13-16)2011–12: #52 of 345 (24-9)2012–13: #109 of 347 (19-13)2013–14: #245 of 351 (15-17)2014–15: #174 of 351 (16-15)2015–16: #43 of 351 (24-11)2016–17: #35 of 351 (27-9)2017–18: #103 of 351 (21-13)2018–19: #175 of 353 (16-16)2019–20: #173 of 353 (12-18)2020–21: #177 of 347 (13-13)2021–22: #197 of 358 (11-18)2022–23: #229 of 363 (11-21)2023–24: #125 of 362 (20-14)2024–25: #205 of 364 (13-18)2025–26: #173 of 365 (18-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 173 of 365 18–14 -0.60 Power
2024–25 205 of 364 13–18 -2.45 Power
2023–24 125 of 362 20–14 3.61 Power
2022–23 229 of 363 11–21 -3.93 Power
2021–22 197 of 358 11–18 -1.68 Power
2020–21 177 of 347 13–13 -0.78 Power
2019–20 173 of 353 12–18 34.01 MRI
2018–19 175 of 353 16–16 29.23 MRI
2017–18 103 of 351 21–13 70.88 MRI
2016–17 35 of 351 27–9 118.04 MRI
2015–16 43 of 351 24–11 111.44 MRI
2014–15 174 of 351 16–15 34.23 MRI
2013–14 245 of 351 15–17 7.90 MRI
2012–13 109 of 347 19–13 55.50 MRI
2011–12 52 of 345 24–9 101.74 MRI
2010–11 230 of 346 13–16 8.96 MRI
2009–10 194 of 335 16–14 21.08 MRI
2008–09 132 of 330 16–14 49.32 MRI
2007–08 125 of 328 21–12 55.89 MRI
2006–07 242 of 326 13–17 -4.34 MRI
2005–06 180 of 326 14–16 28.96 MRI
2004–05 252 of 326 12–15 -6.34 MRI