The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Oral Roberts

Summit · 10–23

Power-11.3#312 of 365
Résumé-8.88#681 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winKennesaw State (91–83)
Worst lossSouth Dakota (69–77)
Schedule faced-4.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Oklahoma State L 71–95 -21.8 -2.2
1 vs John Brown non-D1 W 84–50 +29.3 +4.7
2 vs Tulsa L 87–88 -18.1 +17.1
2 vs Belmont L 60–83 -18.9 -4.1
3 vs Haskell non-D1 W 84–64 +29.3 -9.3
3 at Oklahoma L 71–95 -27.9 +3.9
4 at Florida Gulf Coast L 88–93 -9.8 +4.8
4 N Kennesaw State W 91–83 -13.7 +21.7
4 N Rice L 62–81 -6.0 -13.0
5 at Weber State L 66–92 -10.8 -15.2
5 vs Montana State W 72–68 -10.2 +14.2
6 vs Ecclesia non-D1 W 97–52 +29.3 +15.7
7 at Missouri State L 62–63 -11.2 +10.2
7 at TCU L 53–72 -26.9 +7.9
8 vs UT Arlington L 57–69 -7.9 -4.1
9 at North Dakota L 61–72 -6.8 -4.2
9 at North Dakota State L 77–79 -19.2 +17.2
10 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota L 71–82 -14.4 +3.4
11 at Denver L 87–98 -8.5 -2.5
11 vs Omaha L 62–73 -3.1 -7.9
12 vs North Dakota L 62–79 -1.4 -15.6
12 vs North Dakota State L 58–86 -13.8 -14.2
13 at South Dakota L 69–77 -5.8 -2.2
13 at South Dakota State L 72–95 -12.9 -10.1
14 at St. Thomas-Minnesota L 75–92 -19.8 +2.8
15 vs Kansas City W 69–60 +10.4 -1.4
15 vs South Dakota State L 69–87 -7.4 -10.6
16 at Omaha L 71–80 -8.5 -0.5
16 vs South Dakota W 67–62 -0.3 +5.3
17 vs Denver W 102–80 -3.0 +25.0
17 at Kansas City W 94–70 +4.9 +19.1
18 N Kansas City W 84–62 +7.6 +14.4
18 N North Dakota State L 65–76 -16.5 +5.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #45 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #45 of 326 (25-8)2005–06: #80 of 326 (21-12)2006–07: #73 of 326 (23-11)2007–08: #60 of 328 (24-9)2008–09: #121 of 330 (16-15)2009–10: #110 of 335 (20-13)2010–11: #124 of 346 (19-16)2011–12: #51 of 345 (27-7)2012–13: #125 of 347 (17-14)2013–14: #140 of 351 (17-16)2014–15: #191 of 351 (19-15)2015–16: #210 of 351 (14-17)2016–17: #289 of 351 (8-22)2017–18: #260 of 351 (11-21)2018–19: #319 of 353 (9-21)2019–20: #134 of 353 (13-14)2020–21: #101 of 347 (18-11)2021–22: #111 of 358 (19-12)2022–23: #62 of 363 (30-5)2023–24: #216 of 362 (12-19)2024–25: #313 of 364 (7-23)2025–26: #312 of 365 (10-23) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 312 of 365 10–23 -11.27 Power
2024–25 313 of 364 7–23 -10.59 Power
2023–24 216 of 362 12–19 -3.65 Power
2022–23 62 of 363 30–5 9.97 Power
2021–22 111 of 358 19–12 4.64 Power
2020–21 101 of 347 18–11 6.21 Power
2019–20 134 of 353 13–14 46.67 MRI
2018–19 319 of 353 9–21 -43.88 MRI
2017–18 260 of 351 11–21 -2.77 MRI
2016–17 289 of 351 8–22 -19.37 MRI
2015–16 210 of 351 14–17 16.29 MRI
2014–15 191 of 351 19–15 27.30 MRI
2013–14 140 of 351 17–16 47.32 MRI
2012–13 125 of 347 17–14 50.21 MRI
2011–12 51 of 345 27–7 102.56 MRI
2010–11 124 of 346 19–16 56.83 MRI
2009–10 110 of 335 20–13 63.77 MRI
2008–09 121 of 330 16–15 56.96 MRI
2007–08 60 of 328 24–9 92.87 MRI
2006–07 73 of 326 23–11 86.78 MRI
2005–06 80 of 326 21–12 78.01 MRI
2004–05 45 of 326 25–8 100.76 MRI