The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

Southland · 18–15

Power-1.9#197 of 365
Résumé-2.49#571 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUT Rio Grande Valley (63–59)
Worst lossNorthwestern State (78–79)
Schedule faced-6.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Trinity (TX) non-D1 W 83–56 +38.7 -11.7
1 at SMU L 58–69 -18.6 +7.6
1 at Tarleton State L 77–85 +0.4 -8.4
2 at Kansas L 46–77 -24.9 -6.1
2 at Oklahoma State L 69–85 -12.4 -3.6
3 vs Howard Payne non-D1 W 122–75 +38.7 +8.3
4 at Xavier L 67–88 -11.4 -9.6
5 at Lamar W 57–49 +0.6 +7.4
6 vs Dallas Christian non-D1 W 108–55 +38.7 +14.3
7 at Stephen F. Austin L 60–69 -9.1 +0.1
7 vs Southwestern Adventist non-D1 W 93–36 +38.7 +18.3
9 vs Nicholls L 71–76 +7.6 -12.6
9 vs New Orleans W 83–69 +7.6 +6.4
9 at UT Rio Grande Valley W 63–59 -4.7 +8.7
10 at Houston Christian W 81–65 +7.7 +8.3
10 at Northwestern State L 78–79 +6.0 -7.0
11 at East Texas A&M W 61–50 +7.9 +3.1
11 vs SE Louisiana W 68–56 +10.4 +1.6
12 vs McNeese L 53–69 -9.1 -6.9
12 at Incarnate Word W 79–71 +2.9 +5.1
13 vs UT Rio Grande Valley L 55–64 +0.8 -9.8
13 vs Houston Christian W 73–71 +13.1 -11.1
14 vs Incarnate Word L 69–71 +8.4 -10.4
14 at Nicholls W 83–76 +2.1 +4.9
15 at New Orleans L 78–84 +2.1 -8.1
15 vs Lamar W 76–63 +6.1 +6.9
16 vs Stephen F. Austin L 68–78 -3.6 -6.4
16 at McNeese L 54–70 -14.5 -1.5
17 at SE Louisiana W 73–68 +5.0 +0.0
17 vs Northwestern State W 71–59 +11.4 +0.6
18 vs East Texas A&M W 84–71 +13.4 -0.4
19 N New Orleans W 74–61 +4.9 +8.1
19 N Stephen F. Austin L 58–60 -6.3 +4.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #54 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #129 of 326 (20-8)2005–06: #91 of 326 (20-8)2006–07: #54 of 326 (26-7)2007–08: #259 of 328 (9-20)2008–09: #162 of 330 (18-15)2009–10: #149 of 335 (17-15)2010–11: #310 of 346 (10-21)2011–12: #319 of 345 (6-24)2012–13: #311 of 347 (5-23)2013–14: #174 of 351 (18-16)2014–15: #175 of 351 (20-14)2015–16: #106 of 351 (25-8)2016–17: #99 of 351 (24-12)2017–18: #267 of 351 (11-18)2018–19: #228 of 353 (10-18)2019–20: #295 of 353 (12-18)2020–21: #315 of 347 (5-19)2021–22: #225 of 358 (23-12)2022–23: #185 of 363 (24-11)2023–24: #177 of 362 (21-12)2024–25: #166 of 364 (20-14)2025–26: #197 of 365 (18-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 197 of 365 18–15 -1.87 Power
2024–25 166 of 364 20–14 -0.13 Power
2023–24 177 of 362 21–12 -0.79 Power
2022–23 185 of 363 24–11 -0.55 Power
2021–22 225 of 358 23–12 -3.63 Power
2020–21 315 of 347 5–19 -11.07 Power
2019–20 295 of 353 12–18 -25.98 MRI
2018–19 228 of 353 10–18 3.57 MRI
2017–18 267 of 351 11–18 -5.74 MRI
2016–17 99 of 351 24–12 67.59 MRI
2015–16 106 of 351 25–8 69.27 MRI
2014–15 175 of 351 20–14 33.89 MRI
2013–14 174 of 351 18–16 35.83 MRI
2012–13 311 of 347 5–23 -40.93 MRI
2011–12 319 of 345 6–24 -54.37 MRI
2010–11 310 of 346 10–21 -39.25 MRI
2009–10 149 of 335 17–15 46.78 MRI
2008–09 162 of 330 18–15 36.10 MRI
2007–08 259 of 328 9–20 -12.14 MRI
2006–07 54 of 326 26–7 101.79 MRI
2005–06 91 of 326 20–8 71.25 MRI
2004–05 129 of 326 20–8 47.91 MRI