The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Missouri State

CUSA · 16–18

Power-2.8#208 of 365
Résumé-3.11#582 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLiberty (77–69)
Worst lossDelaware (67–76)
Schedule faced-3.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Missouri Southern State non-D1 W 88–70 +37.8 -19.8
1 vs Northwestern Oklahoma State non-D1 W 106–57 +37.8 +11.2
2 vs Arkansas State L 85–86 -3.9 +2.9
2 at UT Arlington L 49–67 -4.9 -13.1
3 vs UT Rio Grande Valley W 74–67 -0.1 +7.1
4 vs Long Island University L 61–75 +4.1 -18.1
4 vs Northeastern State non-D1 W 92–71 +37.8 -16.8
5 at Tulsa L 74–98 -15.0 -9.0
6 at Xavier L 57–75 -12.3 -5.7
7 vs Oral Roberts W 63–62 +11.2 -10.2
8 vs Lindenwood W 70–65 +6.2 -1.2
9 at Delaware W 61–43 +3.6 +14.4
9 vs UTEP W 79–55 +6.2 +17.8
9 vs New Mexico State W 89–82 +0.3 +6.7
10 at Kennesaw State L 80–90 -8.0 -2.0
10 vs Florida International W 79–71 +2.6 +5.4
11 at Western Kentucky L 72–87 -6.5 -8.5
11 at Middle Tennessee L 87–90 -6.5 +3.5
12 at New Mexico State W 84–75 -5.1 +14.1
12 at UTEP W 62–57 +0.8 +4.2
13 vs Sam Houston L 71–80 -4.3 -4.7
13 vs Jacksonville State W 74–67 +0.8 +6.2
14 at Liberty L 76–79 -11.2 +8.2
15 vs Louisiana Tech L 78–79 +0.6 -1.6
15 vs Delaware L 67–76 +9.1 -18.1
16 vs Kennesaw State L 87–91 -2.5 -1.5
16 at Florida International L 67–70 -2.8 -0.2
17 at Louisiana Tech L 70–72 -4.8 +2.8
17 at Sam Houston L 81–86 -9.7 +4.7
18 vs Western Kentucky W 87–74 -1.0 +14.0
18 vs Middle Tennessee L 63–75 -1.1 -10.9
19 N Florida International W 75–72 -0.1 +3.1
19 N Liberty W 77–69 -8.5 +16.5
19 N Louisiana Tech L 66–69 -2.1 -0.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #23 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #46 of 326 (19-13)2005–06: #23 of 326 (22-9)2006–07: #41 of 326 (22-11)2007–08: #112 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #211 of 330 (11-20)2009–10: #55 of 335 (24-12)2010–11: #52 of 346 (26-9)2011–12: #106 of 345 (16-16)2012–13: #263 of 347 (9-22)2013–14: #154 of 351 (20-13)2014–15: #263 of 351 (11-20)2015–16: #253 of 351 (13-19)2016–17: #134 of 351 (17-16)2017–18: #98 of 351 (18-15)2018–19: #178 of 353 (15-16)2019–20: #94 of 353 (16-17)2020–21: #94 of 347 (17-7)2021–22: #63 of 358 (23-11)2022–23: #113 of 363 (17-15)2023–24: #153 of 362 (17-16)2024–25: #225 of 364 (9-23)2025–26: #208 of 365 (16-18) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 208 of 365 16–18 -2.77 Power
2024–25 225 of 364 9–23 -3.93 Power
2023–24 153 of 362 17–16 1.51 Power
2022–23 113 of 363 17–15 4.20 Power
2021–22 63 of 358 23–11 9.84 Power
2020–21 94 of 347 17–7 6.64 Power
2019–20 94 of 353 16–17 69.54 MRI
2018–19 178 of 353 15–16 27.29 MRI
2017–18 98 of 351 18–15 74.98 MRI
2016–17 134 of 351 17–16 53.01 MRI
2015–16 253 of 351 13–19 -5.94 MRI
2014–15 263 of 351 11–20 -1.80 MRI
2013–14 154 of 351 20–13 43.33 MRI
2012–13 263 of 347 9–22 -16.69 MRI
2011–12 106 of 345 16–16 66.80 MRI
2010–11 52 of 346 26–9 104.46 MRI
2009–10 55 of 335 24–12 107.43 MRI
2008–09 211 of 330 11–20 15.26 MRI
2007–08 112 of 328 17–16 61.34 MRI
2006–07 41 of 326 22–11 118.21 MRI
2005–06 23 of 326 22–9 119.11 MRI
2004–05 46 of 326 19–13 100.64 MRI