The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Oklahoma

SEC · 21–16

Power+13.9#44 of 365
Résumé+10.58#46 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVanderbilt (92–91)
Worst lossSouth Carolina (76–85)
Schedule faced+8.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs St. Francis (PA) W 102–66 +34.3 +1.7
1 at Gonzaga L 68–83 -13.6 -1.4
2 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 95–69 +31.7 -5.7
2 N Nebraska L 99–105 -7.1 +1.1
3 vs Oral Roberts W 95–71 +27.9 -3.9
3 vs Alcorn State W 72–53 +34.4 -15.4
4 N Marquette W 75–74 +5.1 -4.1
5 at Wake Forest W 86–68 +2.3 +15.7
5 N Arizona State L 70–86 +5.5 -21.5
6 N Oklahoma State W 85–76 +6.1 +2.9
7 vs Kansas City W 89–67 +35.5 -13.5
8 vs Stetson W 107–54 +29.2 +23.8
9 vs Mississippi Valley State W 93–69 +46.5 -22.5
9 vs Ole Miss W 86–70 +6.9 +9.1
10 at Mississippi State L 53–72 +5.0 -24.0
10 at Texas A&M L 76–83 -4.4 -2.6
11 vs Florida L 79–96 -12.5 -4.5
11 vs Alabama L 81–83 -7.8 +5.8
12 at South Carolina L 76–85 +5.7 -14.7
12 at Missouri L 87–88 -1.6 +0.6
13 vs Arkansas L 79–83 -4.4 +0.4
13 vs Texas L 69–79 +0.9 -10.9
14 at Kentucky L 78–94 -7.0 -9.0
14 at Vanderbilt W 92–91 -10.4 +11.4
15 vs Georgia W 94–78 +0.1 +15.9
16 at Tennessee L 66–89 -11.9 -11.1
16 vs Texas A&M L 71–75 +1.0 -5.0
17 vs Auburn W 91–79 -1.9 +13.9
17 at LSU W 83–67 +1.6 +14.4
18 vs Missouri W 80–64 +3.9 +12.1
18 at Texas W 88–85 -4.5 +7.5
19 N South Carolina W 86–74 +8.4 +3.6
19 N Texas A&M W 83–63 -1.7 +21.7
19 N Arkansas L 79–82 -7.1 +4.1
22 N Colorado W 90–86 +5.3 -1.3
22 N Baylor W 82–69 +0.4 +12.6
22 N West Virginia L 82–89 +2.1 -9.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #12 of 326 (25-8)2005–06: #35 of 326 (20-9)2006–07: #60 of 326 (16-15)2007–08: #46 of 328 (23-12)2008–09: #11 of 330 (30-6)2009–10: #167 of 335 (13-18)2010–11: #191 of 346 (14-18)2011–12: #114 of 345 (16-16)2012–13: #63 of 347 (20-11)2013–14: #46 of 351 (23-10)2014–15: #19 of 351 (24-11)2015–16: #18 of 351 (29-8)2016–17: #166 of 351 (11-20)2017–18: #100 of 351 (18-14)2018–19: #57 of 353 (20-14)2019–20: #95 of 353 (19-12)2020–21: #41 of 347 (16-11)2021–22: #35 of 358 (19-16)2022–23: #63 of 363 (15-17)2023–24: #42 of 362 (20-12)2024–25: #50 of 364 (20-14)2025–26: #44 of 365 (21-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 44 of 365 21–16 13.89 Power
2024–25 50 of 364 20–14 12.25 Power
2023–24 42 of 362 20–12 12.50 Power
2022–23 63 of 363 15–17 9.93 Power
2021–22 35 of 358 19–16 12.09 Power
2020–21 41 of 347 16–11 10.67 Power
2019–20 95 of 353 19–12 69.13 MRI
2018–19 57 of 353 20–14 92.19 MRI
2017–18 100 of 351 18–14 73.02 MRI
2016–17 166 of 351 11–20 39.91 MRI
2015–16 18 of 351 29–8 150.56 MRI
2014–15 19 of 351 24–11 142.21 MRI
2013–14 46 of 351 23–10 110.90 MRI
2012–13 63 of 347 20–11 91.66 MRI
2011–12 114 of 345 16–16 64.27 MRI
2010–11 191 of 346 14–18 27.49 MRI
2009–10 167 of 335 13–18 36.42 MRI
2008–09 11 of 330 30–6 171.66 MRI
2007–08 46 of 328 23–12 108.19 MRI
2006–07 60 of 326 16–15 97.20 MRI
2005–06 35 of 326 20–9 111.87 MRI
2004–05 12 of 326 25–8 157.59 MRI