Quinnipiac
Metro · 2–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -7.1 avg | × 33% | -2.4 |
| Opponents faced | +2.4 avg | × 33% | +0.8 |
| Preseason prior | -5.1 | × 67% | -3.4 |
| Power | -5.0 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Michigan State | L 59–96 | -35.9 | -1.1 | -0.5 |
| 2 | vs | Bryant | W 66–56 | +12.0 | -2.0 | -0.6 |
| 2 | at | Vermont | W 79–76 | -5.0 | +8.0 | +0.8 |
| 3 | vs | Monmouth | L 70–74 | -0.3 | -3.7 | -1.3 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | -3.4 | |||||
| Power | -5.0 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Central Connecticut | +0.8 | 53% |
| 4 | vs | Maine | +11.1 | 84% |
| 5 | vs | Emerson non-D1 | +31.2 | 100% |
| 5 | at | Yale | -11.2 | 15% |
Season by season
Best finish: #79 in 2009–10. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 19–13 | #189 of 365 · -1.86 | – |
| 2024–25 | 20–13 | #198 of 364 · -2.22 | – |
| 2023–24 | 24–10 | #176 of 362 · -0.73 | – |
| 2022–23 | 20–12 | #191 of 363 · -1.29 | – |
| 2021–22 | 14–17 | #259 of 358 · -6.16 | – |
| 2020–21 | 9–13 | #296 of 347 · -9.03 | – |
| 2019–20 | 15–15 | – | #236 of 353 · 3.36 |
| 2018–19 | 16–15 | – | #186 of 353 · 24.24 |
| 2017–18 | 12–21 | – | #308 of 351 · -31.09 |
| 2016–17 | 10–21 | – | #296 of 351 · -24.93 |
| 2015–16 | 9–21 | – | #273 of 351 · -13.91 |
| 2014–15 | 15–15 | – | #121 of 351 · 56.66 |
| 2013–14 | 20–12 | – | #114 of 351 · 62.25 |
| 2012–13 | 15–16 | – | #131 of 347 · 46.45 |
| 2011–12 | 18–13 | – | #92 of 345 · 74.59 |
| 2010–11 | 22–10 | – | #84 of 346 · 78.72 |
| 2009–10 | 23–10 | – | #79 of 335 · 84.01 |
| 2008–09 | 15–16 | – | #196 of 330 · 22.48 |
| 2007–08 | 15–15 | – | #186 of 328 · 22.61 |
| 2006–07 | 14–15 | – | #218 of 326 · 8.00 |
| 2005–06 | 12–16 | – | #213 of 326 · 13.58 |
| 2004–05 | 10–17 | – | #293 of 326 · -28.41 |