The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Quinnipiac

Metro · 19–13

Power-1.6#194 of 365
Résumé-1.76#541 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winPittsburgh (83–75)
Worst lossNiagara (76–78)
Schedule faced-6.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at St. John's L 74–108 -27.8 -6.2
1 vs Central Connecticut W 71–49 +8.9 +13.1
2 vs Yale L 60–97 -9.1 -27.9
2 at Maine W 70–64 +8.2 -2.2
3 vs City College NY non-D1 W 112–52 +39.0 +21.0
3 at Pittsburgh W 83–75 -9.9 +17.9
4 at UCF L 91–102 -15.7 +4.7
4 vs Stonehill W 76–62 +14.4 -0.4
5 at Iona W 89–68 +0.5 +20.5
5 vs Rider W 72–58 +19.1 -5.1
6 vs UMass Lowell W 75–71 +9.1 -5.1
7 at Monmouth W 85–75 -2.3 +12.3
7 at Hofstra L 66–74 -10.8 +2.8
9 vs Marist W 64–58 +2.6 +3.4
9 at Manhattan L 79–80 +8.6 -9.6
9 vs Mount St. Mary's W 80–69 +8.5 +2.5
10 at Sacred Heart W 70–60 +3.9 +6.1
11 vs Saint Peter's L 70–74 +6.2 -10.2
11 at Merrimack L 71–83 -4.0 -8.0
12 vs Manhattan W 98–92 +14.0 -8.0
12 at Mount St. Mary's W 77–62 +3.1 +11.9
12 at Marist L 64–71 -2.9 -4.1
13 vs Sacred Heart L 91–98 +9.3 -16.3
13 at Fairfield W 72–65 +2.1 +4.9
14 vs Canisius W 75–60 +17.6 -2.6
14 vs Niagara W 56–55 +15.6 -14.6
15 at Siena W 74–62 -3.5 +15.5
15 vs Merrimack L 49–56 +1.5 -8.5
16 vs Fairfield L 79–85 +7.6 -13.6
17 at Niagara L 76–78 +10.1 -12.1
17 at Canisius W 67–63 +12.1 -8.1
18 N Marist L 75–77 -0.2 -1.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #79 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #293 of 326 (10-17)2005–06: #213 of 326 (12-16)2006–07: #218 of 326 (14-15)2007–08: #186 of 328 (15-15)2008–09: #196 of 330 (15-16)2009–10: #79 of 335 (23-10)2010–11: #84 of 346 (22-10)2011–12: #92 of 345 (18-13)2012–13: #131 of 347 (15-16)2013–14: #114 of 351 (20-12)2014–15: #121 of 351 (15-15)2015–16: #273 of 351 (9-21)2016–17: #296 of 351 (10-21)2017–18: #308 of 351 (12-21)2018–19: #186 of 353 (16-15)2019–20: #236 of 353 (15-15)2020–21: #290 of 347 (9-13)2021–22: #264 of 358 (14-17)2022–23: #198 of 363 (20-12)2023–24: #170 of 362 (24-10)2024–25: #197 of 364 (20-13)2025–26: #194 of 365 (19-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 194 of 365 19–13 -1.62 Power
2024–25 197 of 364 20–13 -1.87 Power
2023–24 170 of 362 24–10 -0.20 Power
2022–23 198 of 363 20–12 -1.56 Power
2021–22 264 of 358 14–17 -6.72 Power
2020–21 290 of 347 9–13 -8.51 Power
2019–20 236 of 353 15–15 3.36 MRI
2018–19 186 of 353 16–15 24.24 MRI
2017–18 308 of 351 12–21 -31.09 MRI
2016–17 296 of 351 10–21 -24.93 MRI
2015–16 273 of 351 9–21 -13.91 MRI
2014–15 121 of 351 15–15 56.66 MRI
2013–14 114 of 351 20–12 62.25 MRI
2012–13 131 of 347 15–16 46.45 MRI
2011–12 92 of 345 18–13 74.59 MRI
2010–11 84 of 346 22–10 78.72 MRI
2009–10 79 of 335 23–10 84.01 MRI
2008–09 196 of 330 15–16 22.48 MRI
2007–08 186 of 328 15–15 22.61 MRI
2006–07 218 of 326 14–15 8.00 MRI
2005–06 213 of 326 12–16 13.58 MRI
2004–05 293 of 326 10–17 -28.41 MRI