Monmouth
CAA · 1–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -8.2 avg | × 27% | -2.2 |
| Opponents faced | +7.4 avg | × 27% | +2.0 |
| Preseason prior | -2.0 | × 73% | -1.5 |
| Power | -1.7 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | St. John's | L 63–78 | -27.7 | +12.7 | +0.9 |
| 2 | N | Rhode Island | L 66–84 | -5.8 | -12.2 | -2.0 |
| 3 | at | Quinnipiac | W 74–70 | +0.3 | +3.7 | +0.9 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | -1.5 | |||||
| Power | -1.7 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | at | Wake Forest | -14.0 | 10% |
| 4 | at | Princeton | -3.0 | 39% |
| 5 | at | North Carolina | -23.5 | 2% |
| 5 | vs | Saint Joseph's | -1.8 | 44% |
| 10 | at | Stony Brook | +0.5 | 52% |
| 11 | vs | Hampton | +9.9 | 82% |
| 11 | vs | Charleston | -3.0 | 39% |
| 12 | at | Towson | -4.4 | 34% |
Season by season
Best finish: #51 in 2016–17. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 19–15 | #185 of 365 · -1.68 | – |
| 2024–25 | 13–20 | #250 of 364 · -6.30 | – |
| 2023–24 | 18–15 | #221 of 362 · -4.01 | – |
| 2022–23 | 7–26 | #346 of 363 · -14.20 | – |
| 2021–22 | 21–13 | #174 of 358 · -0.02 | – |
| 2020–21 | 12–8 | #205 of 347 · -2.64 | – |
| 2019–20 | 18–13 | – | #169 of 353 · 35.48 |
| 2018–19 | 14–21 | – | #292 of 353 · -23.78 |
| 2017–18 | 11–20 | – | #208 of 351 · 22.38 |
| 2016–17 | 27–6 | – | #51 of 351 · 101.51 |
| 2015–16 | 28–8 | – | #59 of 351 · 100.97 |
| 2014–15 | 18–15 | – | #190 of 351 · 27.54 |
| 2013–14 | 11–21 | – | #275 of 351 · -10.09 |
| 2012–13 | 10–21 | – | #306 of 347 · -37.46 |
| 2011–12 | 12–20 | – | #307 of 345 · -36.90 |
| 2010–11 | 9–21 | – | #293 of 346 · -23.12 |
| 2009–10 | 12–19 | – | #273 of 335 · -13.99 |
| 2008–09 | 8–23 | – | #318 of 330 · -62.30 |
| 2007–08 | 7–24 | – | #312 of 328 · -53.84 |
| 2006–07 | 12–18 | – | #255 of 326 · -10.02 |
| 2005–06 | 19–15 | – | #173 of 326 · 29.54 |
| 2004–05 | 16–12 | – | #199 of 326 · 19.15 |