Maine
Am. East · 8–24
Power-12.6#323 of 365
Résumé-13.80#718 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVermont (76–70)
Worst lossBinghamton (67–74)
Schedule faced-7.8 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at | George Washington | L 47–67 | -23.1 | +3.1 |
| 1 | at | Stony Brook | L 60–71 | -8.6 | -2.4 |
| 2 | at | Rutgers | L 60–72 | -18.1 | +6.1 |
| 2 | vs | Quinnipiac | L 64–70 | -8.2 | +2.2 |
| 3 | at | Merrimack | L 65–72 | -14.9 | +7.9 |
| 3 | vs | Brown | L 53–58 | -2.2 | -2.8 |
| 4 | at | American University | L 61–74 | -10.3 | -2.7 |
| 4 | N | Longwood | L 61–65 | -8.0 | +4.0 |
| 4 | N | Siena | L 60–64 | -11.8 | +7.8 |
| 5 | at | Ohio | L 57–79 | -11.5 | -10.5 |
| 5 | at | Miami (OH) | L 61–93 | -23.7 | -8.3 |
| 6 | at | Boston University | W 69–59 | -8.4 | +18.4 |
| 6 | vs | Canisius | L 43–70 | +6.6 | -33.6 |
| 7 | at | Drexel | L 56–74 | -11.8 | -6.2 |
| 9 | vs | Maine-Fort Kent non-D1 | W 104–66 | +28.0 | +10.0 |
| 9 | vs | Bryant | L 51–56 | +2.5 | -7.5 |
| 10 | at | UMBC | L 62–69 | -14.3 | +7.3 |
| 10 | at | NJIT | W 74–70 | -1.8 | +5.8 |
| 11 | at | Vermont | L 62–67 | -12.9 | +7.9 |
| 12 | vs | New Hampshire | L 48–65 | +4.7 | -21.7 |
| 12 | vs | UAlbany | W 52–49 | -0.3 | +3.3 |
| 12 | vs | Binghamton | W 79–63 | +8.0 | +8.0 |
| 13 | at | UMass Lowell | L 77–91 | -7.3 | -6.7 |
| 14 | vs | Vermont | W 76–70 | -7.4 | +13.4 |
| 14 | at | Bryant | L 67–73 | -2.9 | -3.1 |
| 15 | vs | UMBC | L 62–78 | -8.9 | -7.1 |
| 15 | vs | NJIT | L 58–67 | +3.6 | -12.6 |
| 16 | at | New Hampshire | W 61–58 | -0.7 | +3.7 |
| 17 | at | UAlbany | W 70–59 | -5.8 | +16.8 |
| 17 | at | Binghamton | L 67–74 | +2.5 | -9.5 |
| 18 | vs | UMass Lowell | L 56–67 | -1.9 | -9.1 |
| 18 | at | NJIT | L 58–60 | -1.8 | -0.2 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #178 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 323 of 365 | 8–24 | -12.60 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 179 of 364 | 20–14 | -1.12 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 244 of 362 | 15–17 | -4.84 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 300 of 363 | 13–17 | -8.72 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 347 of 358 | 6–23 | -15.97 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 321 of 347 | 2–7 | -12.23 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 311 of 353 | 8–22 | -39.80 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 335 of 353 | 4–27 | -69.01 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 341 of 351 | 6–26 | -71.56 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 340 of 351 | 7–25 | -71.48 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 332 of 351 | 8–22 | -57.51 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 346 of 351 | 3–27 | -94.41 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 348 of 351 | 6–23 | -81.25 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 275 of 347 | 10–19 | -22.10 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 254 of 345 | 12–17 | -5.62 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 190 of 346 | 15–15 | 27.98 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 178 of 335 | 19–11 | 31.96 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 287 of 330 | 9–21 | -24.62 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 319 of 328 | 7–23 | -63.94 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 265 of 326 | 12–18 | -14.03 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 299 of 326 | 12–16 | -38.14 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 226 of 326 | 13–15 | 9.42 | MRI |