The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Maine

Am. East · 8–24

Power-12.6#323 of 365
Résumé-13.80#718 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVermont (76–70)
Worst lossBinghamton (67–74)
Schedule faced-7.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at George Washington L 47–67 -23.1 +3.1
1 at Stony Brook L 60–71 -8.6 -2.4
2 at Rutgers L 60–72 -18.1 +6.1
2 vs Quinnipiac L 64–70 -8.2 +2.2
3 at Merrimack L 65–72 -14.9 +7.9
3 vs Brown L 53–58 -2.2 -2.8
4 at American University L 61–74 -10.3 -2.7
4 N Longwood L 61–65 -8.0 +4.0
4 N Siena L 60–64 -11.8 +7.8
5 at Ohio L 57–79 -11.5 -10.5
5 at Miami (OH) L 61–93 -23.7 -8.3
6 at Boston University W 69–59 -8.4 +18.4
6 vs Canisius L 43–70 +6.6 -33.6
7 at Drexel L 56–74 -11.8 -6.2
9 vs Maine-Fort Kent non-D1 W 104–66 +28.0 +10.0
9 vs Bryant L 51–56 +2.5 -7.5
10 at UMBC L 62–69 -14.3 +7.3
10 at NJIT W 74–70 -1.8 +5.8
11 at Vermont L 62–67 -12.9 +7.9
12 vs New Hampshire L 48–65 +4.7 -21.7
12 vs UAlbany W 52–49 -0.3 +3.3
12 vs Binghamton W 79–63 +8.0 +8.0
13 at UMass Lowell L 77–91 -7.3 -6.7
14 vs Vermont W 76–70 -7.4 +13.4
14 at Bryant L 67–73 -2.9 -3.1
15 vs UMBC L 62–78 -8.9 -7.1
15 vs NJIT L 58–67 +3.6 -12.6
16 at New Hampshire W 61–58 -0.7 +3.7
17 at UAlbany W 70–59 -5.8 +16.8
17 at Binghamton L 67–74 +2.5 -9.5
18 vs UMass Lowell L 56–67 -1.9 -9.1
18 at NJIT L 58–60 -1.8 -0.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #178 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #226 of 326 (13-15)2005–06: #299 of 326 (12-16)2006–07: #265 of 326 (12-18)2007–08: #319 of 328 (7-23)2008–09: #287 of 330 (9-21)2009–10: #178 of 335 (19-11)2010–11: #190 of 346 (15-15)2011–12: #254 of 345 (12-17)2012–13: #275 of 347 (10-19)2013–14: #348 of 351 (6-23)2014–15: #346 of 351 (3-27)2015–16: #332 of 351 (8-22)2016–17: #340 of 351 (7-25)2017–18: #341 of 351 (6-26)2018–19: #335 of 353 (4-27)2019–20: #311 of 353 (8-22)2020–21: #321 of 347 (2-7)2021–22: #347 of 358 (6-23)2022–23: #300 of 363 (13-17)2023–24: #244 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #179 of 364 (20-14)2025–26: #323 of 365 (8-24) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 323 of 365 8–24 -12.60 Power
2024–25 179 of 364 20–14 -1.12 Power
2023–24 244 of 362 15–17 -4.84 Power
2022–23 300 of 363 13–17 -8.72 Power
2021–22 347 of 358 6–23 -15.97 Power
2020–21 321 of 347 2–7 -12.23 Power
2019–20 311 of 353 8–22 -39.80 MRI
2018–19 335 of 353 4–27 -69.01 MRI
2017–18 341 of 351 6–26 -71.56 MRI
2016–17 340 of 351 7–25 -71.48 MRI
2015–16 332 of 351 8–22 -57.51 MRI
2014–15 346 of 351 3–27 -94.41 MRI
2013–14 348 of 351 6–23 -81.25 MRI
2012–13 275 of 347 10–19 -22.10 MRI
2011–12 254 of 345 12–17 -5.62 MRI
2010–11 190 of 346 15–15 27.98 MRI
2009–10 178 of 335 19–11 31.96 MRI
2008–09 287 of 330 9–21 -24.62 MRI
2007–08 319 of 328 7–23 -63.94 MRI
2006–07 265 of 326 12–18 -14.03 MRI
2005–06 299 of 326 12–16 -38.14 MRI
2004–05 226 of 326 13–15 9.42 MRI